Login / Register
 
Duran Duran Save a prayer arpeggio
New Reply
Subscribe
rafkey
Thread Starter
#1
27th December 2013
Old 27th December 2013
  #1
Gear addict
 
rafkey's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Belgium

Thread Starter
rafkey is offline
Duran Duran Save a prayer arpeggio

How to achieve this sound ?
I don't need exactly the same sound, but the same mood & groove

What synths ?
except the JP8 ( the one used )

What effects ?
sure a chorus & a delay, but this delay seems hard to recreate

The sequence :

Quote:
Maybe it's just a coincidence (or a common motif between the two songs), but I think you're remembering the beginning keyboard part to "Save a Prayer", except that you transposed it up a major fifth (it's actually D, E, F, A, C, A, C, [A] IIRC).
Thanks for posting your sounds
#2
27th December 2013
Old 27th December 2013
  #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,477

Arcadia is online now
This was done with an SH-2. Any 2-osc synth can do it, though to get the real tone you need 2 osc and sub or 3 osc. It's a combination of square and pulse waves set octaves apart run thru chorus and delay (in this case the RE-501 Chorus Echo) and at the end he adds some portamento to make it all bendy. Most soft synths can do this sound as well.
__________________
Instruments:

Korg EX-8000 | Moog Minitaur | Native Instruments Maschine MK2 | Peavey Liberator J-84 | Roland MKS-50 | Roland Juno-6 | Roland SH-2 | Roland TR-8 | Sequential Circuits Pro-One | Waldorf Blofeld Shadow Edition

FX:

BOSS DS-1 | BOSS RE-20 | Electro-Harmonix Small Clone | Moog MF-103 | Moog MF-104M | Moog MF-108M | MXR Phase 90 '74 Vintage | Roland SBF-325 | Roland SPH-323
#3
27th December 2013
Old 27th December 2013
  #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 30

dp_6026 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcadia View Post
Most soft synths can do this sound as well.
Yeah it comes with OP-X Pro II in the famous presets bank.

Quote
1
#4
27th December 2013
Old 27th December 2013
  #4
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Location: London.
Posts: 166

the synthman is offline
#5
27th December 2013
Old 27th December 2013
  #5
Gear interested
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 25

Stephencl is offline
its actually not an arpeggio, its a sequence. It just uses delay, its pretty easy to re-create with any digital delay effect. I agree with the Synthman above....check out the you tube video its pretty cool.

Stephen
#6
27th December 2013
Old 27th December 2013
  #6
Lives for gear
 
bil_g's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 731

bil_g is offline
I used to a have a patch on the K1 I liked for this.
#7
27th December 2013
Old 27th December 2013
  #7
Gear addict
 
CatManDeux's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 387

CatManDeux is offline
A bunch of years ago I programmed a similar patch on a CZ-101 using the 8 step envelopes to create the delay.
#8
27th December 2013
Old 27th December 2013
  #8
Lives for gear
 
bil_g's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 731

bil_g is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatManDeux View Post
A bunch of years ago I programmed a similar patch on a CZ-101 using the 8 step envelopes to create the delay.
Nice! Ah, the 101. My first synth back in 86(I think). One of the first sounds I tried to recreate with it was the lead from "Blade Runner Blues". Seems funny when I think about that now.
#9
28th December 2013
Old 28th December 2013
  #9
Lives for gear
 
R3Member's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Location: PDX
Posts: 919

R3Member is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by the synthman View Post
Watch "Novation Supernova saves a prayer" on YouTube -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP1a...e_gdata_player
While the guy's patches sounded almost spot on, that was a really horrible tutorial. He doesn't mention how the initial patches were built up. It was pretty much just "you take this sound, add this effect, and there you have it."
#10
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #10
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2010

slowmotion is offline
Quote
1
#11
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #11
Gear addict
 
charles chocula's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 409

charles chocula is offline
#12
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #12
Lives for gear
 
Dirty Halo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 8,826

Dirty Halo is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcadia View Post
This was done with an SH-2. Any 2-osc synth can do it, though to get the real tone you need 2 osc and sub or 3 osc. It's a combination of square and pulse waves set octaves apart run thru chorus and delay (in this case the RE-501 Chorus Echo) and at the end he adds some portamento to make it all bendy. Most soft synths can do this sound as well.

Was it the RE-501? I always thought it was the 201... but you very well may be right, I can't remember where I got my initial info.

-a
#13
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,477

Arcadia is online now
On tour in '84 and in the My Own Way video you can see he had the SRE-555 racked up with the SBF-325s and SPH-323. In the studio he has even to this day an RE-501.
#14
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #14
Gear interested
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 25

Stephencl is offline
Two different sounds

I think the base sequence is JP8, the lead solo is the SH?
#15
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 664

mikael488 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephencl View Post
I think the base sequence is JP8, the lead solo is the SH?
Nick Rhodes has confirmed in interviews that the sequenced part was done with the CSQ-100/SH-2 combo and that the Jup-8 does the lead line. The
high strings are from the Crumar performer.

Here's a live performance from '82:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6zF4vTwh3Y
Quote
2
#16
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #16
Lives for gear
 
Dirty Halo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 8,826

Dirty Halo is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcadia View Post
On tour in '84 and in the My Own Way video you can see he had the SRE-555 racked up with the SBF-325s and SPH-323. In the studio he has even to this day an RE-501.

Gotchya, thanks What's the differences between the RE-501 and 201 delay-wise (assuming that's what he was using it for, and not the reverb or chorus).

-a
#17
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,477

Arcadia is online now
Delay is the same, but SRE-555 and RE-501 offered improved S/N ratio and noise reduction so they are more "clean" sounding than the 201. For those that want that dirty dubby sound the 201 is the one to get. But part of the joy of the 555/501 is the chorus - it's a really nice analog chorus similar to the SBF-325 chorus.
#18
8th January 2014
Old 8th January 2014
  #18
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 318

intuitionnyc is online now
Quote:
Originally Posted by R3Member View Post
While the guy's patches sounded almost spot on, that was a really horrible tutorial. He doesn't mention how the initial patches were built up. It was pretty much just "you take this sound, add this effect, and there you have it."
I think the OB plug-in sounded more spot on than the Supernova. IMO that is.
#19
9th January 2014
Old 9th January 2014
  #19
Lives for gear
 
Dirty Halo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 8,826

Dirty Halo is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcadia View Post
Delay is the same, but SRE-555 and RE-501 offered improved S/N ratio and noise reduction so they are more "clean" sounding than the 201. For those that want that dirty dubby sound the 201 is the one to get. But part of the joy of the 555/501 is the chorus - it's a really nice analog chorus similar to the SBF-325 chorus.
Thanks

-a
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Topic:
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.