15th March 2013
|
#1 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 224
Thread Starter | What analog synths DON'T have a thick/growly sound?
I know a lot of synths out there can do great variations on a deep 24/db filter sound. Moog really created a 'standard' in sound. But what I'm looking for is a synth that has a 60s sci fi feel to the sound - thin, blippy and bubbly.
The best example of what I mean obviously is the EMS Synthi/VCS3. But since that is only becoming rarer/pricier I doubt I'll ever own one unless a stronger company starts making them again.
The early ARP synths are another example. The mk1 Odyssey and early 2600s have that metallic zap I like.
Early Korgs (700/770/MaxiKorg) also do this well, but have no performance controls or patch-ability.
The Minibrute can do this if the filter isn't pushed in the mixer.
So...apart from modulars (which can clearly do this with the right parts) and VA synths (I don't knock them entirely, but I haven't heard one ever nail the sound I'm thinking of) what other synths can do this sort of sound???
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#2 | | Gear addict
Joined: Jan 2013 Location: Armenia
Posts: 324
|
The Doepfer Dark Energy II, maybe??? Dark Energy II
________________________
Bad: If it measures better it must sound better.
Equally bad: Coitus science I have my ears.
__________________
Bad: If it measures better it must sound better.
Equally bad: Coitus science I have my ears.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2010 Location: USA
Posts: 2,647
|
Interesting question. Depends on what you mean by thick growly sound or sounds. That could mean anything in the world of synth.
But I know with all my analogs these can be done. If the oscillators aren't the thickest, use a sub like on my Alpha Juno. Put on some delay and verb and your there.
__________________ Synths:
DSI MEK, DSI Prophet '08, Yamaha DX-7, Roland Gaia, Roland Alpha Juno 1, Arturia MiniBrute, Korg Monotribe, Yamaha AN1x, Korg X-50 Guitars:
Ibanez Artcore A85 JazzBox, Ibanez SZR720BB, 1989 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 1981 Gibson ES-335, 1986 Fender JapStrat. Effects:
Roland RE-201 Space Echo, MXR Carbon Copy Delay, MXR Analog Stereo Chorus, Digitech RP-1000 MFX Amps: Fender HR Deluxe 112, Peavey KB100 Recording:
Zoom HD16 Hardware Recorder, Cubase 5, Yamaha HS50m Monitors
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,243
|
Op check out the Yamaha CS5 CS10 CS15, maybe what you're after
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#5 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 224
Thread Starter |
To be more clear I guess I mean the 'anti Moog' sound - 12/db filter with a thin osc is a rough estimation. I guess the Yamaha CS synths fit in there as well.
This thread is a roundabout way of me considering getting rid of a SH-2 and find what I should replace it with. I love the SH2, but it rarely gels with what I'm looking for and it doesn't make sense to hold onto what doesn't work... Which is funny because I GASed over it (and still do). I bought the SH2 thinking I'd do heavy dance tracks but I quickly realized I want to make songs with a 60s sci fi feel and the Roland keeps cutting too deep.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#6 | | Moderator
Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alphaville
Posts: 5,521
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu To be more clear I guess I mean the 'anti Moog' sound - 12/db filter with a thin osc is a rough estimation. I guess the Yamaha CS synths fit in there as well. | Some synths that come to mind: - Korg MonoPoly. Thin on low end, though thick in the low mids. Has a strong analogue character.
- Korg MS-20 with applied HPF.
- And if you're looking for complex sounds, CS-30. Simply best bang for the buck and stellar possibilities! You got HPF to thin out the sounds a bit. Though i should mention, CS-30 can get thick sounds as well, not in the Moog class, but thicker than MonoPoly, somewhere in the MS-20 range.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#7 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 224
Thread Starter |
The Church of Yamaha beckons, it seems ...
Do the CS filters oscillate at all?
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#8 | | 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 89
|
i never thought the alpha juno was very rough, or the andromeda
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#9 | | Moderator
Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alphaville
Posts: 5,521
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu Do the CS filters oscillate at all? | Self-osc not that much, though CS-30 comes with a sine wave VCO, if you need them bubbles. One of the distinguishing features of the Yamaha CS-series is the filters. The CS filters are not spectaular sounding 4-pole ones with self-oscillating resonance, like the Prophets, Moogs and Oberheims of this world. They are 12 db/oct, non-self-oscillating, and their strengs lie in their delicacy. Given a harmonically complex signal, the CS filters are able to play the harmonics of the original signal. It is hard to explain in plain words, but it sounds great!
Read more, plus audios: http://212.242.106.33/~etcetera/publ...0/cs30page.htm |
| |
15th March 2013
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2012 Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,406
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Solaris Some synths that come to mind: - Korg MonoPoly. Thin on low end, though thick in the low mids. Has a strong analogue character.
- Korg MS-20 with applied HPF.
- And if you're looking for complex sounds, CS-30. Simply best bang for the buck and stellar possibilities! You got HPF to thin out the sounds a bit. Though i should mention, CS-30 can get thick sounds as well, not in the Moog class, but thicker than MonoPoly, somewhere in the MS-20 range.
| Though you can beef the Mono/Poly up with careful waveform selection and oscillator mixing  it's 4 weedy oscs will then be able to compete with a standard 2 osc roland or moog monosynth. m/p bass sits nice in a mix.
But yeah, it does thin and blippy well.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#11 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 224
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Solaris Self-osc not that much, though CS-30 comes with a sine wave VCO, if you need them bubbles. One of the distinguishing features of the Yamaha CS-series is the filters. The CS filters are not spectaular sounding 4-pole ones with self-oscillating resonance, like the Prophets, Moogs and Oberheims of this world. They are 12 db/oct, non-self-oscillating, and their strengs lie in their delicacy. Given a harmonically complex signal, the CS filters are able to play the harmonics of the original signal. It is hard to explain in plain words, but it sounds great!
Read more, plus audios: YAMAHA CS-30 SYNTHESIZER | One thing that I need from whatever replaces my SH2 is to do a sound with negative filter env and a oscillating filter to create a slow bloop sound. Apparently the cs-15 can have the filter oscillate with an ext. in feedback loop.
CS-15 it is. Bye bye Roland, I hardly knew ye.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#12 | | Gear addict
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 313
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu I know a lot of synths out there can do great variations on a deep 24/db filter sound. Moog really created a 'standard' in sound. But what I'm looking for is a synth that has a 60s sci fi feel to the sound - thin, blippy and bubbly.
The best example of what I mean obviously is the EMS Synthi/VCS3. But since that is only becoming rarer/pricier I doubt I'll ever own one unless a stronger company starts making them again.
The early ARP synths are another example. The mk1 Odyssey and early 2600s have that metallic zap I like.
Early Korgs (700/770/MaxiKorg) also do this well, but have no performance controls or patch-ability.
The Minibrute can do this if the filter isn't pushed in the mixer
So...apart from modulars (which can clearly do this with the right parts) and VA synths (I don't knock them entirely, but I haven't heard one ever nail the sound I'm thinking of) what other synths can do this sort of sound??? |
these VA/Hybrid i think do this well
Akai AX80
Korg MS2000
Waldorf Q
Yamaha DX7
The P12 which is hybrid sounds like it will handle this very well.
In the Analog Realm i would say
Anything in the Yamaha CS range with ring modulation
Schmidt Synth (if it comes out) has special oscillators for metallic sounds
to be honest anything analog that has ring modulators and FM and a nice resonant filter is likely to give you pleasing results.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#13 | | Moderator
Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alphaville
Posts: 5,521
| Quote:
Originally Posted by xanderbeanz Though you can beef the Mono/Poly up with careful waveform selection and oscillator mixing  it's 4 weedy oscs will then be able to compete with a standard 2 osc roland or moog monosynth. m/p bass sits nice in a mix. | One thing i've noticed about MonoPoly (at least after being recapped) is that it is totally noiseless. Saw and square can therefore be played as low as 20% while triangle is set to 100% to somehow fill in the sound and compensate for weak lows. (Still miles away from SH-2s low end.  ) Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu CS-15 it is. Bye bye Roland, I hardly knew ye. | No!
Go with CS-30. Look the features it gives you then try to purchase that anywhere else - at that price!
CS-15 is a musician / player's synth. CS-30 is mad scientist's synth for crazy SciFi sounds!
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#14 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 224
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Solaris One thing i've noticed about MonoPoly (at least after being recapped) is that it is totally noiseless. Saw and square can therefore be played as low as 20% while triangle is set to 100% to somehow fill in the sound and compensate for weak lows. (Still miles away from SH-2s low end.  )
No!!!!!!!
Go with CS-30. Look the features it gives you then try to purchase that anywhere else - at that price!!! | The 30 looks like a killer, but I'm wanting something somewhat decent in portability. That's what drew me to the sh2, and what's drawing me to the 15. If I were going to commit to a mono of that size, I'd save for a SH-5 and have the king
Plus the few hundred I save from the SH2 sale will go towards my string synth purchase. I'm on a budget, this is a win win for me.
The 30 is tempting though...
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#15 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2012 Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,406
|
Yeah i'm aware my setup needs a low end king, the plugiator minimoog emulation is sufficing at the moment, one day i hope to own a Moog Source
Is the JP4's low end any good? I know it's related to the SH series and is next on my GAS list.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#16 | | Moderator
Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alphaville
Posts: 5,521
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu The 30 looks like a killer, but I'm wanting something somewhat decent in portability. That's what drew me to the sh2, and what's drawing me to the 15. | Ok in that case don't forget the CS-15 mods: Yamaha CS-15 modifications |
| |
15th March 2013
|
#17 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 224
Thread Starter |
One step ahead of you, already got the parts for them in my cart on Mouser
I originally got an SH-2 based on your review of it in a bass synth thread; you never gave the disclaimer it could be TOO much bass  . The 15 seems to be where my head is right now... All gear is temporary, though. Right???
I plan on rolling a jazz cigarette and giving the SH2 a proper send off by endlessly playing Roy G Biv until I find a buyer |
| |
15th March 2013
|
#18 | | Moderator
Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alphaville
Posts: 5,521
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu One step ahead of you, already got the parts for them in my cart on Mouser | Almost!
There are two more mods which weren't mentioned...
But will be. Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu I originally got an SH-2 based on your review of it in a bass synth thread; you never gave the disclaimer it could be TOO much bass |  Yes. Definitely too much in the bass area.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#19 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,319
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu I know a lot of synths out there can do great variations on a deep 24/db filter sound. Moog really created a 'standard' in sound. But what I'm looking for is a synth that has a 60s sci fi feel to the sound - thin, blippy and bubbly.
The best example of what I mean obviously is the EMS Synthi/VCS3. But since that is only becoming rarer/pricier I doubt I'll ever own one unless a stronger company starts making them again.
The early ARP synths are another example. The mk1 Odyssey and early 2600s have that metallic zap I like.
Early Korgs (700/770/MaxiKorg) also do this well, but have no performance controls or patch-ability.
The Minibrute can do this if the filter isn't pushed in the mixer. | well you named a few quite different sonic groups here.
for the EMS thing, which is bubbly and organic and scifi, but not at all thin- System100 Model101 is the best. it has a similar diode ladder filter to EMS, and excells at fx/bubbliness/sweeps, but its also incredibly fizzy and organic. like all late60s and early 70s stuff. very different sound to SH2, tho it can also do fantastic sequence and bass lines, in its own character. it has some growl too. that its semi modular doesnt hurt either. even better, but costly is to combine it with a model102 expander. http://www.babic.com/SYN/100/System100-diode-ladder.rar http://www.babic.com/SYN/100/System100-filter-fm.rar
for the Korg thing, obviously Korg MS20 - it fits your description of thin oscillators, but interesting edgy filters , and quite flexible semi modular setup, way more than system100. has ring modulator which is instrumental in old scifi. however, its basic osc and filter character does not sound as 60s/70s as system100 can. its somehow more postapocalyptic, even technoid at times  i know, i know..hard to put these things in words..
if you need more flexibility and capacity for complex and/or leftfield stuff. another option is to make a small euro system , get a few filters,, a EMS type filter among other things.. a few triangle core vcos , ring mod etc.. a lot can be done even in a single 3U system. you can go as anti-moog as you want. even tho it wont replace any peitcualr vintage piece, you can go slightly towards vintage saturated sound with some discrete VCAs etc,, or go as pure as you wish.
all together for the kind of thing you described, i would (and am) go model101, and expand it with a small 3U euro... add another vco of different character (like bubblesound triangle core for example), some cv and audio mixers, a "vintage" ringmod by Oakley , and some crazy cv mod like Wogglebug. best of both worlds - a vintage for core sound i.e. vco/vcf/vca, and modern stuff do mangling.
__________________ music for film, tvseries & theatre live psyhedelic ambient |
| |
15th March 2013
|
#20 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,131
|
on a bit cheaper end, SH-101 has that nasal mono roland tone, the random LFO can make some pretty sci-fi sounds, pair it with a space echo for instant dr.who vibes |
| |
15th March 2013
|
#21 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Home Enthusiasm
Posts: 4,480
|
bass station
106 chips
monotron!
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#22 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 712
|
Doepfer Dark Energy II.
If I remember correctly it has the A-121 Multimode VCF, which is 12dB/8ve.
Cheap, MIDI implemented and semi modular. It sounds great as well.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#23 | | Gear addict
Joined: Dec 2010 Location: Detroit
Posts: 341
|
Like a few others I'd say:
CS-5 (simple, cheap, sounds good)
CS-15 (step up from the 5, getting pricey)
MS-20 (it's current, no real worry of age and repair)
Monopoly (a little thin, but the FX section can get pretty weird)
I have a lot of vintage synths, and compared to my entire Roland X0X line, those listed eat a lot less room in the mix.
This may sound weird, but Roland's remind me of an elastic band for some reason... I don't know why but the filters remind me of them... Strange
__________________
Gear: A bunch of analog gear, some digital gear, a bunch of cords...
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#24 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2012 Location: Norway
Posts: 532
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Solaris | Might want to change where you share it, they want you to sign up and install a suspicious program (the pdf download is an .exe)?
Edit: No problem finding it elsewhere.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#25 | | Gear nut
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 140
|
sci 6 trak sounds nothing like a moog!
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#26 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 589
|
My MKS 70 wasn't particularly fat or growly.. so that range of synths (MKS70, JX8/10) might be what you're looking for. The mks was very expressive though, having velocity sensitivity and aftertouch. Sometimes it kindof felt like a poor man's CS80.
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#27 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 2,118
|
Prophet 08
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#28 | | Gear Head
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 65
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallu I know a lot of synths out there can do great variations on a deep 24/db filter sound. Moog really created a 'standard' in sound. But what I'm looking for is a synth that has a 60s sci fi feel to the sound - thin, blippy and bubbly. |
Yamaha An1x, Polivoks
|
| |
15th March 2013
|
#29 | | Gear addict
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 462
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Solaris CS-15 is a musician / player's synth. CS-30 is mad scientist's synth for crazy SciFi sounds! | Definitely! I have both and I couldn't agree more.
CS monos are clearly not thick, growly Moog sounding. But the OP was also looking to do 60s sci-fi sounds, and I don't think the CS-15 will deliver. The Odyssey is much, much better at that.
__________________ Prophet 08 / Odyssey / Juno-60 / CS-30 / Korg 01W / FS1R / TR-606 / RY30 / Ensoniq DP4+ /// Sonar |
| |
15th March 2013
|
#30 | | Gear nut
Joined: Jul 2009 Location: Near Toronto
Posts: 138
|
No mention of the Roland SH5? This thing has one of the best sci-fi sounds that you describe you are looking for.
__________________
• J P 8 • J P 6 • J P 4 • J P 8 K • S H 5 • S H 1 0 1 • P R O P H E T 1 0 • O B 8 •
• M E M O R Y M O O G • M I N I M O O G • M U L T I M O O G • A R P O D Y S S E Y 2 • K O R G 7 7 0 • O C T A V E C A T • E M L S Y N K E Y •
• C H R O M A P O L A R I S • Y A M A H A C S 1 5 • C S 4 0 • C S 5 0 • M I N I B R U T E • O C T A T R A C K • R E 5 0 1 • R E 2 0 1 •
• E T C • |
| | | |