12th June 2012
|
#1 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,269
Thread Starter | Moog modular software?
I am looking to get a moog modular emulator to decide later on if I can implement the ideas I have to ldecide later on if I want to get a modular, and which modules to get. I looked at the Moog Modular V by arturia, but their modules are fixed, meaning there are only 9 oscillators one FFB, etc. Anyone know of a better solution with user-chosen module layout? Not necessarily Moog emulator, but something with modules that correspond to real modules.
|
| |
12th June 2012
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Sasquatch, OR
Posts: 4,646
|
you could get a nord modular G1 or G2 used. or if you use reaktor go to the user library and get the RUHR ensemble.
there's also VAZ modular
|
| |
12th June 2012
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2007 Location: London
Posts: 2,144
| |
| |
12th June 2012
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,269
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by Beermaster | guess you didn't read my post
|
| |
13th June 2012
|
#5 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Emeryville CA
Posts: 1,973
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ignatius you could get a nord modular G1 or G2 used. or if you use reaktor go to the user library and get the RUHR ensemble.
there's also VAZ modular | I recommend VAZ Modular. It's still one of the best sounding soft-synths IMO. Some people don't like the lack of "wires" but I find it pretty straight forward to work with. Look at Karma modular as well, pretty good and easy to use. Zebra also sounds great but is a bit harder to wrap your head around at first.
|
| |
13th June 2012
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2012 Location: North Portland
Posts: 967
|
If you just want something that gives you the basic ideas of cable patching and modules, try this freeware Sonigen
It's a full fledged modular system that let's you drag and drop modules, wires included  ! However, the oscillator selection is fairly limited, but it'll give you a rough idea of patching and what not.
As far as sound quality goes, meh, there is better.
__________________ |
| |
13th June 2012
|
#7 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2010 Location: USA
Posts: 2,649
|
A friend of mine has the Arturia Moog software and loves it. It sounds great to me, but I haven't been in the same room with the real thing so nothing to compare it to.
It seems very simple to use, which is key as modulars can be complicated to those not familiar.
__________________ Synths:
DSI MEK, DSI Prophet '08, Yamaha DX-7, Roland Gaia, Roland Alpha Juno 1, Arturia MiniBrute, Korg Monotribe, Yamaha AN1x, Korg X-50 Guitars:
Ibanez Artcore A85 JazzBox, Ibanez SZR720BB, 1989 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 1981 Gibson ES-335, 1986 Fender JapStrat. Effects:
Roland RE-201 Space Echo, MXR Carbon Copy Delay, MXR Analog Stereo Chorus, Digitech RP-1000 MFX Amps: Fender HR Deluxe 112, Peavey KB100 Recording:
Zoom HD16 Hardware Recorder, Cubase 5, Yamaha HS50m Monitors
|
| |
15th June 2012
|
#8 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Oct 2009 Location: Tarzana, CA
Posts: 261
|
I have a real Moog IIP and the Arturia software version. The Arturia MMV is great for certain things, but I can assure you that while its "close" its not the same thing. If you are looking for something beyond the Arturia MMV, at least as far as being able to add and remove modules, then I recommend Reaktor which is unbelievably deep.
__________________
Moog IIP, Dot.Com 66, Cubase 6.5, i7920/EX58UD5/9Gigs Dominator1600, 2xMR816, MidiExpress128, Novation SL61MKII, HR824s, NS10Ms, Komplete 7, Omnisphere, RMX, Trilian, MMV, Z3ta, Slate VCC, Axon AX50, Variax700, Alembic Rogue 5, LP Giovannis...
|
| |
15th June 2012
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2007 Location: S.California
Posts: 1,062
|
I'd like to do this with my life and with people in general.I would like to try things as a robot with robots first to see if things turn out ok,If they do,I'll get human's to substitute and duplicate the process.
__________________ |
| |
15th June 2012
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2008 Location: Location Location
Posts: 902
| Quote:
Originally Posted by carlheinz I'd like to do this with my life and with people in general.I would like to try things as a robot with robots first to see if things turn out ok,If they do,I'll get human's to substitute and duplicate the process. | So so true.
|
| |
15th June 2012
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,708
| Quote:
Originally Posted by XXXEsq ... If you are looking for something beyond the Arturia MMV, at least as far as being able to add and remove modules, then I recommend Reaktor which is unbelievably deep. | yeah, probably too deep for what he's looking for. it's not like Reaktor in general works anything like a real modular. well, sort of, but it's not quite plug and play.
however, the Reaktor User Library does feature Chet Singer's fantastic 'Ampere' modules which pretty much do work like this. they end up on a fixed panel, but the behind-the-scenes wiring is very simple (based on the Nord G2 software). nobody ever talks about them though, everyone just seems to mention Herw's creations which (while fantastic) are of fixed configuration similar to the Moog Modular V.
one option that might be worth checking out is the *free* Nord Modular G2 Demo software. that might be great for your needs, and it's probably the easiest to use modular software that exists.
some other options (some previously mentioned):
- KarmaFX Modular: i like this quite a bit. pretty easy to use, with a great degree of flexibility. has some downsides, but overall i think it's one of the best choices for this sort of thing.
- Sonigen Modular: modeled after the Nord software editor. not impressed with the sound or function overall. i really wanted to like it, but was pretty disappointed.
- Vaz Modular: not a fan myself. the interface is clunky and it's ugly as hell. every once in a while i'll fire up the demo to see if my view on it has changed, but just end up pissed off.
- AAS Tassman: do not like. at all.
__________________ your gear list does not impress me. |
| |
15th June 2012
|
#12 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Sep 2009 Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 159
|
I so wanted to get into Tassman. I think it sounds good, but they really need a better way to wire those modules together. I figured it would be in the next version, and you know how that goes... Quote:
Originally Posted by jbuonacc - AAS Tassman: do not like. at all. | |
| |
15th June 2012
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,708
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawling Wind I so wanted to get into Tassman. I think it sounds good, but they really need a better way to wire those modules together. | not only that, but wtf is with making it look like lab equipment? those big meters and all that wasted space? f'ing horrible...
same with Vaz Modular, too much wasted space (amongst other crimes).
oh, i forgot about the SonicCore Modular IV. seems f'ing great, but requires their hardware and is damn expensive.
|
| |
15th June 2012
|
#14 | | Gear Head
Joined: Apr 2010 Location: New York City
Posts: 67
|
These days the cool kids are into Roland modular emulators...
|
| | | |