![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 190
Thread Starter | Groovy or expressive programming in Trackers
Hello, I'm a (fairly) happy Renoise user of a couple of months now and am enjoying it as a means of getting track ideas down pretty quickly and, by some strange virtue of the GUI, making better arrangements. The one thing I really struggle with presently is the "mechanical" nature of tracking sequencers. I can apply groove to drum parts and the note on/note off approach works well with fast parts (16th note basslines etc). I understand there are hexadecimal key commands that affect delays between and during note on/note off info, I just really struggle to wrap my head around how to recreate, say, playing a couple of quarter notes with sixteenth note length breaks between them, then holding the notes for eights etc... I have had a look at the Renoise fora and tutorials online and I am struggling to understand what commands or equivalent values would have that same effect. For percussive parts, I've note used anything so handy in a long time, but for melodies and pads etc, I'd love to be able to affect note lengths and the breaks between notes more easily. Thanks for any help or suggestions you can make... |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 6
|
I've got the same problem. I really struggle to get my tunes "groovy". The shuffle funct in Renoise isnt really any useful. But they are talking about this track delay function, you'll fint it on the first page on the renoise tips/trix forum on renoise.com. Check it out. Note on/off is useful. If its the percs u could use an external sequenser, like for example Geist or Nerve and use the internal shuffle there. Or put a small amount of silence in the beginning of the perc samples, will get the same result as track delay, if i've understood it correctly.... Anyway. I guess its got a bit to do with the fact that you have 100% control of the sequensing in Renoise. I love it, but when it comes to "feeling"/"human"/"shuffle" i think we have a bit of a problem. If anyone know anything more than me, i'll be glad to hear about it! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 41
|
No Renoise users here. Renoise forums. Sent from my ADR6300 using Gearslutz.com |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 190
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: France
Posts: 308
|
If i want someting more natural i just play it live on a midi keyboard. your playing is recorded and translated in delays/velocity commands etc...
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Logic Express vs Sountrack Pro? (midi?, virtual plugs?) | OSX86 | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 1st April 2012 11:52 PM |
| MOTU MIDI EXPRESS XT CONNECTION | pschmailinglist | Music computers | 3 | 9th November 2008 05:50 AM |
| Studio or Interface Upgrade? | CShorte | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 25th April 2007 12:33 AM |
| MOTU MIDI EXPRESS XT & SONAR 1 IN WINDOWS XP | pschmailinglist | Music computers | 0 | 19th April 2007 12:41 AM |
| Step programming in a DAW | elsaddiq | Music computers | 1 | 11th February 2007 02:46 AM |
| |