SH-101 Low Pass filter thoughts - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production


SH-101 Low Pass filter thoughts

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th February 2012   #31
Lives for gear
 
acreil's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 723

Quote:
Originally Posted by seancostello View Post
It would be interesting to compare the IR3109 filter w/diode clipping to a filter based around 4 13600 OTAS (+ external buffers) that used similar diode clipping, and see what kind of sonic differences result.
I think the 80017A clones use the 13600 or 13700 with op amp buffers. They're supposed to sound identical, at least according to the people who sell them. Of course there are no diodes in those.

I find the Korg NJM2069 also distorts a lot. In the Poly 800 and DW-8000 the power supply is only +/- 5V, so there's not a lot of headroom.
__________________
New 53-EDO algorithmic composition
Wanted: Kurzweil K250 power pod, Motorola MC68B09E, Korg Polysix keys. youtube, soundcloud(1), soundcloud(2), bandcamp, last.fm
acreil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2012   #32
Gear Head
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 63

Quote:
=seancostello;7545774]It would make for an interesting mod. For that matter, any cascaded OTA filter would probably take on an SH101 flavor with back-to-back diodes going to ground in the feedback loop.
Quote:
Mind you, not all OTAs are made equal. I am not a big fan of the CEM3320, as it sounds kinda brittle to me. The LM13600/13700, and their equivalents, apparently use something similar to the CA3080, which has a nice tanh() overdrive response. It would be interesting to compare the IR3109 filter w/diode clipping to a filter based around 4 13600 OTAS (+ external buffers) that used similar diode clipping, and see what kind of sonic differences result.
It also depends on the type of buffer stages used.
Quote:
Of course, everyone has different tastes. Some people love the precise filters in the Micromoog and Multimoog, while I prefer the coarser, more distorted Rogue filters. The Monotron has one of my favorite filters EVER,
and I suspect that the noise from the low voltage power supply adds to
the sound for me. Generally speaking, I'd rather have a thuggish
overdriven VCF than a filter with sharp resonance.
Hard driven S/K filters do NOT sound nice!............never!
zxcvbnm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2012   #33
Lives for gear
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 6,738

Quote:
Originally Posted by seancostello View Post
The more feedback needed for a given Q factor, the higher the internal signal levels, and the more possibilities for tasty distortion. Not saying that this was the goal, but it seems like this was the result.

The SH101 uses the same IR3109 chip as the Juno-60, but has back-to-back diodes going to ground in the feedback loop, which will limit the self oscillation volume, and produces a raunchy sound as the resonance is turned up. The Juno-60 filters always sounded tame to me, in comparison to the SH101.

So if one was inclined to un-tame a Juno 6 or 60, one could go in armed with a handful of diodes and nothing else....? If so, that's interesting...or is there more. Stands to reason there might be. But if a bunch of diodes to ground in a feedback loop would render a Juno a gurning beast like a 101 I would take that as a challenge to pop one open......
__________________
what is a small difference? genetically there's only a small difference between a human and a banana. - golden beers
Karloff70 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2012   #34
Lives for gear
 
acreil's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 723

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karloff70 View Post
So if one was inclined to un-tame a Juno 6 or 60, one could go in armed with a handful of diodes and nothing else....? If so, that's interesting...or is there more. Stands to reason there might be. But if a bunch of diodes to ground in a feedback loop would render a Juno a gurning beast like a 101 I would take that as a challenge to pop one open......
It might be a better idea to try on a modular type thing first. If someone were to make a cascaded OTA VCF with maybe a tiny breadboard section where you could insert components, you could try swapping diodes like people sometimes do with distortion circuits: silicon, germanium, LEDs, two in series, various asymmetric configurations...

You could conceivably make a little auxiliary board that permits things to be switched between several variations. And in principle it would be more or less the same for any synth. But the effect might be overwhelming in a polysynth.
acreil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2012   #35
Lives for gear
 
audioconsult's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,474

Quote:
Originally Posted by acreil View Post
I think the 80017A clones use the 13600 or 13700 with op amp buffers. They're supposed to sound identical, at least according to the people who sell them. Of course there are no diodes in those.

I find the Korg NJM2069 also distorts a lot. In the Poly 800 and DW-8000 the power supply is only +/- 5V, so there's not a lot of headroom.
maybee the diodes are outside the chip?

i just did 2 junos each with 2 broken voices with theese chips.. they had 13700 for filter and vca.. and i was highly sceptical.. but even for my ablton sound not as good as other daw´s ear they was just fine.. propper replacements
audioconsult is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low ceiling / Acoustic Question dreamaudio Studio building / acoustics 96 11th September 2011 05:41 PM
Daking filter question andychamp So much gear, so little time! 3 21st November 2007 11:00 PM
About the low end of corner bass traps Ydope Low End Theory 34 9th March 2007 10:22 PM
best headphones for low end monitoring cebolao So much gear, so little time! 5 5th March 2007 09:25 AM
EQ with Selectable High Pass? Lunatic Low End Theory 9 21st February 2007 06:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.