mastering.. two examples, same song - Page 2

3phase · 10th August 2011

that dont sounds like a remaster ..rather like a new multitrack mixdown... where this multitrack was probably just an 8 track..

in the so called remaster the relationbetwenen the instruments is scrambeld.. the voice sit somwher in the back with an aditional reverb on the reverb inside the vocal stem..sounds rtaher sick in relation to the original version wher the instruments and the voice form a union somehow that is happening on one stage... also the stereo of the space synth is more in a natural range than the total wide version in the new mix.

3phase · 10th August 2011

but interesting thread regarding how to value audio quality polls and discussions on this forum.

the tomato on the ears fraction seems to be just around 50-60% ..what is pretty good for the internet.

View Poll Results: which version sounds "better" to you?
original version 1978	9	32.14%
remastered version 2001	10	35.71%
no difference	0	0%
I like cookies	9	32.14%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

10th August 2011	#31
3phase Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,266	that dont sounds like a remaster ..rather like a new multitrack mixdown... where this multitrack was probably just an 8 track.. in the so called remaster the relationbetwenen the instruments is scrambeld.. the voice sit somwher in the back with an aditional reverb on the reverb inside the vocal stem..sounds rtaher sick in relation to the original version wher the instruments and the voice form a union somehow that is happening on one stage... also the stereo of the space synth is more in a natural range than the total wide version in the new mix.