![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 614
Thread Starter | General Questions on Drum Machines
I've acquired some synths in the past year and now I'm waning to get a drum machine next. Then a sequencer and a sampler... Before I go out and spend more money I want to make sure I know enough to make a good decision. And that's where your opinions come in. I have a few questions. 1.) Does the same level of the analog vs. digital argument over synths also apply to analog drum machines vs drum programs? 2.) I'm considering the Dave Smith Tempest. And let's assume it sounds great. Lets say it sounds just as good if not better than the Roland 808(just for the sake of my question). For that price tag is it worth it in a way that it will get me better quality sounds than any software or is it more of a luxury? I will be using this for studio recording only. 3.) What drum programs get the most praise? I have BFD and I thought it sucked big time. I also have EZ-Drummer and it's much better than BFD but still not great. BTW I use Logic if that makes any difference. And I don't just want rock drum sounds. I like some of the drum sounds of bands like BOC and Daft Punk. Thanks in advance for any opinions you might share. :-) And if anyone has any sound samples of a good analog machine and software feel more than free to share them. I'd love to hear 'em. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2010 Location: Deep OuterBass
Posts: 1,462
|
Hi Gringo, There is a drum machine built into logic, I have forgotten the name at the moment. It's in the AU/plug section. Alternately you could use the ESX24 as a drum sampler. 1) I guess that argument rages on. Its not a concern for as I use a 909. 2) Better quality is a subjective thing really. 3) Konrakt and that d16 seem to get a lot of love round here. Sorry I can't provide a more detailed answer as I am at work now. I check back later and see what if any other questions you have that I may be able to answer. D |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 160
| The answer to each of your questions is highly dependent on what you're interested in achieving with percussion in your music. What genres of music will you be working on? What sort of rhythms are you interested in utilizing? What sort of sound do you want to achieve with your percussion? Will you be performing live, in the studio, or both? Is there a chance you’ll be collaborating with others, who may use your gear? In what way do you need percussion to synchronize to the other instruments in your music? Do you need the ability to tune each percussion element to virtually any note? Until you’ve got a better idea of what you want from the percussion in your music, I don’t think it’s possible to accurately answer the questions you’re asking. For what it's worth, I've got a TR-909, TR-808, TR-727, CR-78, R8 MKII, Stretch DX, TOM, and use a variety of software from trackers to BFD, and in my opinion there are advantages and disadvantages to each. You've mentioned the Dave Smith Tempest, which although I have not used strikes me as a drum machine with a lot of potential, that in the right setup could easily work well as the sole percussion machine.
__________________ For Sale: 32 Channel Soundcraft 200B Mixer : For pick-up in Surrey, BC |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Joined: Aug 2011 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6
|
i'm a big fan of NI Maschine for the hardware/software route/integration. been using that setup w/logic pretty seemlessly. Maschine comes with a nice variety of soundsets, and it's easy to work in different plug-ins, if that's you're thing.... for natural drums I like addictive drums and bfd, otherwise i use the soundsets from maschine, or load up some random samples i've collected... if you're looking for hardware take a look at the akai mpc series, or maybe the elektron octotrak. these specific hardware drum machines doesn't have any inherent sounds, it's more based on the samples you load in. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 560
|
Yeah, I was going to suggest an MPC1000 or 2500... Can be used as a drum machine, sampler and sequencer all in one...
|
| | |
| | #6 | |||
| happy cycling | Quote:
There are several iconic drum machines. There are several iconic synthesizers. There are a lot of forgettable ones. An 808 and a LinnDrum are respected, even though the latter is not analog. Few people care about a Boss DR660. Both the JP8 and the JD800 are respected, even though the latter is not analog. Few people care about a Roland D10. Quote:
It still has to prove its worth. It still has to prove that it sounds good. It still has to prove that the sequencer is awesome in various ways, and you'll always have the cantankerous octogenarians complaining that it isn't as good as the old stuff. Quote:
Why not just use EXS to build your custom drumkits? As long as each sample spans a single key, you'll essentially have something similar - perhaps not with the nifty pre-programmed rolls or rudiments, but if you're looking for DP or BOC drums that's not going to be any concern anyway.
__________________ For all the intelligence and knowledge that technology empowers us with, the lazy and stupid is amplified along with it (Staticstarter) Threads to check out: Chord Generators & Tips | Pop Sound Sources | |||
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2011 Location: Montréal
Posts: 1,576
|
I really liked the BFD 8-Bit Kit Have you ever tried out a machinedrum? Thats prolly what im going to get for a drum machine |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,266
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jun 2011 Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 70
|
Unless you're really fanatical about the original sounds, I'd use samples (and the debates are def out of control in both directions on this one). On the other hand, the drum machine mistique is also partly about the feel of the programming. I'm not talking swing settings, etc. It's kind of a ghost in the machine kind of thing. For example, I have an Akai MPC2000 and beats programmed on it feel different than the same exact pattern (and same exact samples...) in my Beatscape program.
__________________ ------------------------------- http://www.eutoxita.com http://www.cdbaby.com/Artist/EUTOXITA http://www.floodwatchnh.com/ |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,266
| Quote:
The typical in the box beat starts..and goes on and on and on and on and on... the typical drum machine beat does this and that ..and a break here and there.. its most definitely the user interface that leads to the results here..and that another person can join in on a session ..a drum machine is a workstation in itself..that can be more fun than watching the monitor together... | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2011 Location: New York
Posts: 91
| Quote:
Since you've already got it - should at least try it out before dropping $600 on Maschine or a Tempest. At least. | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2010 Location: LA
Posts: 488
|
Ultrabeat isn't bad at all. Just buy a nice pack if samples and load em up. If you're not into ultrabeat, check out numerology. The sound issue is all subjective. Samples do the job just fine. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 531
|
Just get battery 3 with an mpd. I have an mpd but it just gets in the way of my workflow. I just trigger everything with a midi keyboard. Some people SWEAR by the drum machine and thats cool since i seen many cats ONLY use a drum Machine making dope shit lol. Just know what you want and your workflow
__________________ And when you get to talking bout the greatest I just really hope that You think of me Cause Im doing my thang Cause I'm tryna be Unforgettable... |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2011 Location: Detroit, MI, USA
Posts: 341
|
Ultrabeat is good, but not great. I'd say its one of the weak points on Logic tool set. Now, if you truly care enough about drum synthesis....make your own. I did it in Logics ES2...a drum, a tom tom, a snare, and a hi-hat. Not really advanced or special kind of sounds, but they work well, can be tweaked a bunch, and are good starting points for my future productions. Another thing to look into for drum synthesis is Rob Papens Punch. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 857
|
Here are some capacities that I'd be wanting, ideally, in any drum machine * independent outputs (snare, bass, hh etc, all on their own channel) * the ability to change the nature of a sound at any stage in the mix. If you want to increase the "snap" of a kick drum (ie the hi freq transient at the beginning of its strike), you should be able to adjust this even at the end of the mixing process. This is an advantage of a drum synth (like a machinedrum) over something which only does samples (like an electribe, for example). * something which is capable of producing really low bass sounds (even though you'll use them judiciously or sometimes not at all). Kick synths and samples vary greatly in this regard. The rest is all personal taste with regard to sounds, workflow, etc. But in my opinion: if you are after ultra-realistic drum sounds, remember you won't ever quite get it right unless you record an actual drummer playing a real kit. If not that, then sample libraries - not a drum machine - are the best bet. But that's ok because drum machines are usually valued for their own unique, artificial sound. This is entirely true even of those which make use of samples. Or even consider getting two items which complement each other - it's not too expensive to pick up a new analogue machine - say an MFB, or even a monotribe - and an old digital machine like a Yamaha RX5 (which I really want to get my hands on actually). |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,211
|
Buy the drum, sample it to death, and sell it. Drum machines are nearly obsolete. Software samplers is where it's at.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 857
| Quote:
The key advantage of a drum synth is that you can fundamentally alter the sound, in its generative phase, as little or as much as you want. Once you sample it it is concrete. Of course you can change it with signal processing at this point, but a drum synth offers purpose-built sound design at the initial phase, which can be altered at any stage of the mix with ease. The example I offered before was to tweak the snap of a kickdrum. This is tremendously easy and second nature to do on a machine drum, with nearly limitless options. Once you sample it you lose that facility; you can still alter the sound but not at that level, with such ease. | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,398
|
imo the thing you should be thinking about most in a drum machine (other than sound) is the interface and sequencer.. usability.. is it a fun piece of gear? the thing with drum machines is the hands on aspect of them. that can be really fun and inspiring and lead to new places. having separate outs.. like 6-8 is helpful... but if you don't like the interface and actually using the thing then it doesn't matter how many features and outputs etc it has because you won't want to use it. i use drum machines from time to time.. and use software etc.. different tools can lead to different methods/different sounds/patterns etc.. so, i think it's good to mix it up once in a while. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2010 Location: Deep OuterBass
Posts: 1,462
|
I completely agree with people are saying about user interface. For Me it's a high priority. It's part of why I love the 909 and one of the main reasons I bought my Cirklon. Without the Novation Remote I would like sell my Microwave in favor of something with knobs. Really, at the end of the day you should be enjoying what you are doing otherwise you may as well just go to the beach! |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
It also has a sine algorithm that can substract only the sinewave so you can get a clean round kick drum from some dirty samples. But yes a dedicated machine is recommended. I would love a Tempest with hands on control but especially for creating new sounds! | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Emeryville CA
Posts: 1,385
|
I've had a love/hate relationship with drum machines or "grooveboxes" or even "workstation" instruments over the years. While they have some "hands on" interface advantages, they ultimately fail when they go up against anything that has a 19" LCD monitor. So, Maschine and Spark offer a work-around to that by giving you the interface of a hardware drum machine coupled with the editing features of a DAW. I own Maschine and demoed Spark as a plug in. Maschine won for sound hands down for me, though it's anemic "song mode" is kind of unforgivable considering it's price and the fact that it's not tethered to being hardware only. Both of the above use samples, though Spark also has a synth engine that I found unimpressive. The point is that if an analog machine can make a sound, both of those solutions can make it as well, via a sample. However, this will "break" when trying to do interesting things like modulating aspects of the sounds in real time. Nothing reacts to that like a real analog filter or effects section. Having said that, there are a lot of software drum machines that I think do kick ass jobs. The very cheap Waldorf Attack is excellent, as is mDrummer (Samples and synth) Drumaxx, Ironhead, Axon, Microtonic and Extreme Drumsynth are all ones I own that I think are great. I think the D16 ones are good too, but frankly I try to avoid those "classic" drum machine sounds as they're too overused IMO. So... do I want a Tempest or other all analog drum synth? You bet I do. However, I cancelled my Tempest preorder and ended up getting a NS/Stick (string instrument) instead. I realized that with my other DSI synths I can get at least part of the way there and I've already had great results making drum sounds on my MoPho and sampling them in Maschine. It's good enough for me. Anyway, things like Korg electribes... I guess cool if you need something with decent sound to use live sans-computer, but like all VA I feel it's been equaled in software in terms of sound and dedicated hardware/software systems like Maschine and Spark make more sense. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 314
|
Get an 808
|
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 195
| Quote:
I also have a real 808. However, what I want to accomplish with the Mopho is to be able to recreate the 808's bassdrum and be able to play it chromatically accross the keyboard as well as be able to tweak various other paramters. Basically, I'm talking about a more flexible 808 bassdrum. Is the Mopho capable of this? If so, the Mopho together with the TR808 would be a very dangerous combination for subs!!!!! | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear addict |
The Tempest sequencer looks to be very fun and productive to program. From the videos out there, it looks to have both the benefits of a TR-style step sequencer plus the nice MPC drum pads. The two ribbon controllers also seem to be able to do some interesting stuff. With that, you also get DSI analog synthesis, with both digital and analog oscillators, builtin distortion and compression. It will be a nice bonus if they add the ability to load custom samples, but that isn't a deal breaker for me. I pre-ordered a Tempest and am pretty excited get one in my hands.
|
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear |
Tempest looks like it could be the one to go for, looks very promising. Avoid stuff like Maschine and Spark, they are just controllers for software, not actual drum machines. |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,266
| Quote:
In the 30 years samplers are on the market they havent made drummachines obsolete... What makes you think that this will happen now ? A drum machine is what separates a man from a boy | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 343
| |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 195
| |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
That X-Y pad on the Spark is hot man, its like having a Kaoss Pad built into your drum machine... but things that are software you do have to be wary with, because if Arturia goes under or decides to make Spark 2 or NI makes Machine 2, forget using your Spark or Machine on Windows 8! Which means, it will become essentially a paperweight, unless you keep a dedicated Win7 machine to run it! Dont think these manufacturers are oblivious to this... If you buy a real 808, it will probably keep pace with inflation. Try doing that with Spark! | |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2010 Location: LA
Posts: 488
| |
| | |