![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter | How can I emulate human league vocal?
Ok, I have a challenge for you guys. YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. How can I reproduce this singer's performance? Forget about the actual timbe of the guy's voice. I just want to capture the essence of performance. How do you think I could record a voice in a similar way? I'm trying to figure out what's going on. It sounds sorta like he is singing two feet away from the mike and singing in a barn or something. What kind of reverb and effects do you think is going on? I want to use outboard only. I have: Mackie VZ mixer Sm7b Comp54 compressor Line 6 m13 Tc electronics effects rack Can I create a performance roughly similar with this equipment? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Synthesist Joined: Nov 2008 Location: omaha
Posts: 96
|
This is probably how it went down on the actual recording. "I’d get him to do three takes, comp them and it always worked. A Neumann U77 was the mic that I used, and occasionally we’d record him in the toilet" "Toilets tend to be quite live because of the tiles and the mirrors and the porcelain, and they’re also normally quite small. So you get a sort of live, boxy resonance which, on hand claps and occasionally on vocals, can sound really good" From this fantastic article. Human League Dont You Want Me | Classic Tracks |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter |
Holy crap. Thank you so much for that article! What an eye-opener. I actually have an all-tile bathroom that I think would be perfect for that. I see he used a MCI console, which is sorta like a Mackie, which I have. What kind of preamp do you think he would use on a U77 back in that day? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2011 Location: in the north of Germany
Posts: 18
|
Argh! My bathroom is to big to reproduce the singer's performance. Now i'm searching for a new flat. ![]() Maybe some reverb could improve the performance. Give the Behringer V-Verb a try (if you find a working one). But remember the bathroom ist the starting point! |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear |
sure if take out the 'ake' it might do ![]() . |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear | ![]() alexP |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,710
|
dude. we understand. but an MCI console is nothing, i mean NOTHING like a mackie. the only thing that could be said of them being the same is they are audio boards. that being said, mackie isn't awful. you'll do fine, just comparing it to a big name, big dollar analog console is quite humorous.
__________________ Solo:http://randomlyassoertedangels.bandcamp.com/ Group:www.myspace.com/theygrowontrees Studio:http://www.myspace.com/populistrecording Label:??? i love you! soundcraft parts: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/gears...ml#post7125016 |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote from article: "This was in addition to a 32-channel MCI console that Rushent describes as “the greatest console I’ve ever had. I rue the day I got rid of it. Because of its rudimentary computer mixing, I had VCA faders and mutes, the two things I could program, which used to lift 90 percent of the load off me once I’d done a mix and could then get on with working the effects. However, what I really loved about that desk was the EQ. The closest thing to it now is the Mackie, which in essence is a modern, reverse-engineered MCI — that’s why I’ve got a Mackie in my current studio. I can always grab that EQ if I need it. However, I’d love to have the MCI back." | |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,710
| Quote:
I'd love to see a shoot out honestly. i get this feeling he wouldn't be saying that. AND WHAT MACKIE!!!!!????? | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear Head Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 30
| |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 441
|
Well now he won't need that MCI back |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter |
Well, I did my first little experiment. Went down and got a 100ft mike at GC (using that 10% coupon of course) so I could actually record from my bathroom. Set up the mic stand in the toilet. Well, not actually in the toilet. Didn't know whether to place it in the tile shower or outside of it. Or whether I should face the tile walls or not when singing. I ended up putting the mic in the tile shower and singing directly toward all the tiles. Luckily I didn't electrocute myself in the process. I did just three takes of course in memory of martin ![]() The signal chain I used: sm7b Mackie 1202-vlz (of course I used as much of that "magical dust" mackie eq that I could, e)Comp54 compressor (modded) as insert TC Electronic Impact Twin (recorded at 44.1 and 24bit) Dumped into Cubase 6 and merged with original song (no processing at all in DAW other than faders). Exported as 44.1 and 16bit wav file. I'm not a singer of course. I just wanted to see how it would come out. Here is a short sample of me singing over Phil: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5866491/seconds%20SAMPLE.wav This was a lot of fun! |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 7,623
| Quote:
MCI and Soundcraft consoles at the time were the budget boards (compared to most other boards of that era, which were Neve, API, SSL, etc.) Remeber, the "pro-sumer" concept of recording gear and home studios wasn't close to what it is today. So, simple misunderstanding, I believe. Hope that helps to clarify. -andrews | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter | Quote:
I don't know. He is about as clear as you can get: "...the Mackie, which is in essence a modern, reverse-engineered MCI..." I don't think that leaves much room for dispute on what he was thinking. We'll never know for sure now though. | |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 7,623
| Quote:
)
| |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,710
| that's what i was saying. that mci is alot more board then that mackie. but he doesn't state what mackie really. not that i think it makes a difference. i don't know if mackie has anything that could stand up to an mci, but i have been proven wrong before, and sometimes things like that happen. it's not totally out of the question, but highly unlikely. highly.
|
| | |
| | #22 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,005
| Quote:
Yes, music is supposed to be fun! So, seems you are on the right track! steelyfan
__________________ Oh no, I like both kinds of music.......Country and Western. Music I'm working on here: http://www.myspace.com/eucalyptuspond Paintings: http://shannonjsimmons.wordpress.com/ | ||
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Thread Starter | Quote:
Wow, thx man. I'm trying to write my own song and see if I can kinda capture the same vibe. Lyrics are hard though. I can write all day long, but lyrics are so hard. | |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,005
| Quote: ![]() cheers steelyfan | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,710
|
i find i write my best material during the most stressful and depressing parts of my life. carry a little tape recorder or a handheld digital recorder and just start singing into it. before you know it, you'll be writing your best material. it takes time like anything else does. |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 35
| Quote:
Rushent:So he's only talking about the EQ, not the whole desk. | |
| | |