![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | Top Headphones for mixing 100% perfect.
Top Headphones for mixing 100% perfect. What should i buy ? Help from mixing engineer please |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 224
|
No headphones will get you as close as a good pair of reference monitors. There isnt enough bass representation, and your stereo image will not be accurate. If you need a good pair tho I would recommend the AT50's.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | Ok Thanks i have monitors but i like to listen to headphones to more is better hope you listen to your mix not only in monitors.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Finland
Posts: 64
| Headphones | HeadRoom Audio If you can't buy monitors headphone.com is pretty good site for trying to find the most suitable cans for you. I ended up buying AKG K 240 MK II with the help of the site but you might need something more bass heavy. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | Ok Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Finland
Posts: 64
|
Dunno your budget but I really liked Beyerdynamic DT990 when I tried 'em and they are quite bassy. Also the already mentioned AT50's are nice with electronic stuff.
Last edited by Toseben; 18th July 2011 at 12:48 PM.. Reason: Mixed DT990 up with DT770. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear for Lives. Joined: Jan 2011 Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,808
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear Head Joined: Oct 2010 Location: Magog, Quebec
Posts: 34
|
Seinheiser HD600 (open back is better if you must mix with headphones....more bass). If money is no object get a good D/A converter. I got the benchmark DAC-1 USB which is a great match for the Seinheisers. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear |
Grace Designs headphone amp & Sennheiser HD series. Get what you like. Sony has some, Beyer Dynamic and AKG too. All very good choices. You tell us what you like best.
__________________ I use BAGEND SPEAKERS. you should hear em too. http://www.myspace.com/a-muze#!/556701704 |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2010 Location: Stockholm Sweden
Posts: 87
|
Beyerdynamic T1, T70 or DT 990 Edition ![]() |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 224
|
Not sure the price of the others I know the at50's will only run you around $100. I wouldnt invest much more then that on phones.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2004 Location: Pacific N.W.
Posts: 446
|
+1 on the Beyerdynamic DT990 phones. I think they're great. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,274
|
Yeah... I mix down on headphones and monitors back and forth. If I do most of the mixing on headphones, then play it pack through monitors, I notice my kicks and bass lines are MUCH too louder than everything else...but at the same time, headphones I can hear much more transient, background and hidden noises (like slight faint delays that fade out) in the mid to upper registers that I have a hard time hearing through monitors.
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 308
|
I have the DT 770 Beyer's which good - my only complaint is that after about an hour or so they give me a headache as they are quite tight on the head
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2006 Location: lake district
Posts: 334
|
man, there's a thread on the same page about the same thing. ever heard of search?
|
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2010 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 213
|
DO NOT mix in the cans. Save up for monitors. tutttutttutt Peace. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2010
Posts: 243
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,938
| Denon AH-D7000. The bass representation is as good as it gets, and everything else as well. The detail level is extremely high. There are no better dynamic headphones as far as I'm concerned (and that includes HD 800).
|
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 187
|
I've got Denon AHD2000's, the 7000's little brother, and they are incredible. Agreed about Denon's |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Manic Modulator Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 197
|
I highly recommend the Sennheiser HD650s . . . they're really open and the bass is huuuuge :] You can easily hear sub-bass on these things!
|
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2010
Posts: 243
| Quote:
No,no,no.....The 650's are way to hyped in the low end, they sound muffled. The worst thing about them is that they have no detail in the high end. They are very veiled imo. I had them for 6 months and had to sell them. I figured i'd try the 600's, thinking they'd be the same, but not at all. Amazing headphones. Great smooth highs and clean( a little shy however) bass. | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 311
|
For dance music with heavy bass i still like my classic HD25-1 phones even more than my HD650 but you need to know them quite well they have kind of DJ sound but after 6 year with them my mixes translate pretty well even on my few pairs of speakers after some random night mix session. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,983
|
People tell you not to mix in cans because they're a very inaccurate source. Why: Entire separation of L+R No natural room reflections So... Your reverbs will sound bigger than they are. Your bass won't cancel if it's out of phase Your transients won't sound right. Your sound design will be wrong. So yeah you can do it, but you have to know the headphones really well, and compare it to a decent monitor mix. It's not an easy way to learn.
__________________ http://soundcloud.com/zakwhiteley |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Between the Notes, Iowa
Posts: 2,036
|
A lot o generalizations here... Often, open backed is better, but not always. The Denons have some of the best deepest cleanest bass out there, and they are closed backed. They go much deeper and cleaner than most monitors. They are unusual though. Although accurate neutrality is also rare in cans, it is certainly no rarer than in monitors in real world rooms. In fact, it is much easier and cheaper to get reference quality sound from top quality cans than with monitors, although monitors will always offer a different and critical perspective. Given that much of the current consumer listening is done on ear buds, one wonders what the most appropriate way to monitor is anymore... Any monitors or cans will need to learned... In any case, the OP said he has monitors... Agreed that the Sennheisers are overly warm and fuzzy; sweet though... and although the 650s are an improvement over the 600s in some ways, many feel the 600s have a better overall balance. Agreed that the Denons are great. They are a bit hyped in the low bass and highs, although the low bass is clean and very helpful in sussing out bottom end issues that would not show up in almost any other cans and not many monitors without a subwoofer. I find all the Beyers bright. Although a bit low bass shy, the 880s are much flatter in the lower end than the 770 or 990, both of which are seriously hyped in the bass. The M50s are good for the money but not the end o the line. Not spend more than a $100 on cans? Why not? They're good but I like the Denon AH-D2000 much better for as little as $200 street, and there are much better still... I haven't heard them yet, but the Audeze LCD-2 are supposed to be the sh*t if you can afford them; not to mention the Stax if you really wanna pull out the stops, along with the check book... Still no mention from the OP about budget... And agreed that there are dozens of identical threads... SEARCH!
__________________ Tim Britton producer, engineer, musician, audio sales http://www.piedpiperprod.com http://uilleanpipes.com row, row, row your boat... |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2010 Location: Peterborough - England
Posts: 610
|
I'm picking up a pair of KRK KNS 8400. Initially they'll be for the artist but I figure I might use a pair to check mixes...
|
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
| I got these. I like them much better my senn hd595. Sounds cleaner, less muffled. Just for those late nights when I want to do a bit of mixing.
|
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Between the Notes, Iowa
Posts: 2,036
|
They look like good bang for the buck... Let us know how you like em... and what you're comparing them to...
|
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,812
|
the AT50s will definitely give you the bass you need. Too much bass, imo. It makes your mix seem more bass-heavy than it really is. so, you need to keep that in mind if you buy them.
|
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Between the Notes, Iowa
Posts: 2,036
|
agreed about the M50s. I just looked up the frequency response of the KRK. The highs are unusually un-hyped, but they look to be a bit hot around 2-4kHz and they have a MAJOR boost around 100-300 along with a big boost in the very low bass, so not very accurate but sweet, and affordable. "Looks" like the M50s would be more accurate for the same money. Still rather pay twice that for the Denon AH-D2000. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2011 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,921
|
If you mix with cans, you need to crossover each channel, or use the VRM function in the Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 DSP, which adds a bit of room and speaker modelling to that. Which is why I have one |
| | |