![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston
Posts: 1,180
Thread Starter | 5 SH-2's on Ebay right now
But wouldn't you say they are all overpriced? Shipping is 150. ******************.com/?_from=R40&_trk...All-Categories Dont even get me started on the Moog Source thats been sitting forever at 2,500 bucks. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2009 Location: French quarter of Canada
Posts: 1,620
|
All from Japan = over priced. So what if they're in great/amazing condition, plus you have the costly postage. 7-800 max.
__________________ See my new new gear set up: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/6909198-post3523.htmll |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
|
yeah i dunno the going rate is like 700-900 these days soo take shipping in to mind and stay within that and you'll be fine...that one for 799 seems like a decent deal im tempted to sell mine honestly and my moog prodigy and try to score a minimoog model d....it really doesn't sound that much better/worse than my sh101....although i guess the extra OSC is kinda nice... |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Between Harmony & Irregularity
Posts: 2,178
|
There was a SH2 with the mod for Osc sync and a LFO mod for $850 that sold a month ago on one of these forums. That makes sense, but I stay away from ebay. Silly stuff goes on there. If I want a synth I'll buy from a good forum.
__________________ "It ain't the instrument, Baby!" - Ray Charles |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
| i got mine from modeless factory together with a cs-10 for a combined price...yeah its japan but he's probably the most legit/fair japanese dealer there is. he's got one for $850 shipped up right now and one for $1099 that's like absolutely mint.
|
| | |
| | #6 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston
Posts: 1,180
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
Sell me yours xero. I'll buy it. | ||
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston
Posts: 1,180
Thread Starter | Quote:
![]() ![]() | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
| well i got a mks70 so im selling the jx8p, its not because i don't like the jx8p, but at one point my jx8p had a messed up divider chip which i fixed, and i was gonna just keep it if i couldn't fix it, but since i fixed it now it's going up for sale....the sh-2 and prodigy are going to take my jx8p's place on my rack stand and I want to get that all setup so i can actually have some more hands-on time with the sh-2, i may end up not selling it afterall, but i would probably have no issue selling the prodigy for a model D if the opportunity came up...but i haven't bought anything since the jupiter 8 and xv-88 back in may which make up my 2nd 3 tier stand (jp8/xv88/cs10) quite honestly i'm still paying off some of it which i bought via billmelater, i am down to about $900 left which i should have paid off next month! That was mainly the mks70 and xv-88...selling the jx8p should take care of a chunk of that too... you wont see me buying anything til atleast September which is convenient cause that's my bday! |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston
Posts: 1,180
Thread Starter | Quote:
And I just cant go modern analogue, I'm just not feeling it. Dont care what anybody else says. Well I care what they say but I just dont agree for the most part on the sound. | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2010
Posts: 286
|
I want to buy one but I'm not gonna bother ordering one from Japan. (I'm from Europe) So I was thinking of looking for another sh. But even like a 09 or 1 are hard to find. The only one I do find easily is the widespread sh-101. How does the sh-101 compares sound wise to the 02? Are those completely different beasts? |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,008
| Sh-2 has noise as a waveform option and sounds totally different than the 101. Sh-2 is warmer and has more of a 70s vibe and 101 is more biting.
__________________ Instruments: Crumar Performer | Korg DW-8000 | Moog Minimoog Voyager Select (Walnut/Jade) | Peavey Liberator J-84 | Roland Juno-6 w/Kenton MIDI | Roland Jupiter-4 w/Io MIDI | Roland S-10 | Roland SH-2 | Sequential Pro-One (coming soon) FX: BOSS DS-1 | BOSS RE-20 | Electro-Harmonix Small Clone | Moog MF-103 | Moog MF-108M |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 195
| Quote:
The SH-2 is completely different from the SH-101. If memory serves me correctly, it's entirely discrete, whereas the SH-101 is chip based. The envelopes are faster on the SH-2, and its filter is based off of the older, Roland modular gear. I've had the two side-by-side. Due to laziness and the lack of a properly-aligned technical vocabulary, I'll say it this way: The Sh-101 has the sound of 80's acid house. Resonance is key, here, and you can make it squelch and squeal. The SH-2 gives the Minimoog a run for its money. Its oscillators are extremely powerful and the filter goes from "woody", with lower resonance to "acidic" with higher resonance. I think it may be a ladder filter, like the moog, but I could be wrong. The SH-101 is awesome, but the SH-2 is deadly. Was my secret bass weapon for many, many years. Good luck! | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston
Posts: 1,180
Thread Starter | Quote:
The sh101 sounds totally different to the Sh-2. The 101 is great for like acid music . . . or its good for people who cannot afford a Tb303. They dont sound exactly like a Tb303 but it kind of covers the same sounds. You wont get a nice thick moog like sounding bass out of a 101. I'm going for a Moog Source or an SH-2 because they do amazingly awesome bass. As far as I've researched there are 3 bass synths people really go for, Moog Source, SH-2 and SC Pro One. Of course there's the Mini Moog but thats expensive. Anyway, the sh-2 doesn't sound like the 101 at all IMO. | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
| Quote:
I coulda swore it was lacking a waveform or something the sh-101 doesn't have OOOH i remmeber, the sub-osc on the sh-2 isn't adjustable, i think its just a squarewave, on the sh101 you get a few options for it...i think 2 octave options and a pulse or something | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston
Posts: 1,180
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
| lol so i finally took my jx8p off the stand and put up my additional arms and got my sh-2 and moog prodigy on my 3 tier... ok yeah after playing around some more the sh-2 is pretty sweet and definitely has a slightly warmer/70sish/wahtever sound, it's basically less "sharp"/more dark sounding, it sounds kinda fuzzy almost, the sh-101 is more crisp and resonant sounding...but honestly they still sound very very similar...discrete or not. after all the sh-101 used the ir3109 which is the same as the junos and jupiters and such... i have a feeling maybe the sh-2 is just a discrete version of the ir3109 or something... the sh-2 keyboard sucks, sh-101's is much better. that 70s-era roland keyboard is just meh...the later ones are much better. but really, i've got all the cv/gate to midi adapters i need so there's little reason to ever touch it's actual keyboard if you don't want to... the sub-osc can be adjusted octave up/down but it follows whatever OSC1 is set to...ok so that's not so bad...you can't choose pulse though, it's always square...but really that's almost as good as the sh-101 since you can adjust the octave which i thought you couldn't it helps when you actually use the damn things you buy eh? It's just been on the backburner since i have been dreading to lug the jx8p around and disassemble my keyboard stand but i've finally did it...i should clean up in here and get my mks50/70 racked next and then i am probably due for some more pictures |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2009 Location: French quarter of Canada
Posts: 1,620
|
I had a 101 at point but ultimately decided to sell it in favour of the sh-2 more of less for the same reasons above. Besides my Jupiter 6 when using one osc one env can sound almost exactly the same. Being CEM based and all. While not as a "acidic" filter the SH-2 is defiantly bassier and bigger sounding. The sh-2 has a sine wave on osc-1 and a unique feature "auto bend". But yes the 101 sub had an option of 1 or 2 octaves down or 2 down + fixed pulse. SH-2 has a fixed square one octave down from osc-1. |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,123
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,491
|
Yes, do tell!
|
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2010 Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 709
|
Another huge plus the 2 has over the 101 is the external input and envelope follower. Great feedback/overloading sounds can be had looping it into itself...
|
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston
Posts: 1,180
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Philly
Posts: 2,916
|
so i was playing around with my jp8/808 and sequencing the arp via midi and ended up playing around with the sh2 half way in www.xero.cc/sh2jp8.mp3 comes in around 3:50 so you can fastforward to hear it if you just want to hear that...my jp8 arpeggio is being triggered by midi and i was playing the jp8 at first in split mode but then i was like oh hey my sh2 is on...lets play... so yeah i am not so sure i want to sell it now...it's definitely got character. if i ever do get a model D, ill probably just front the money and then sell what i don't want afterwards...prolly the prodigy, i mean it sorta wishes it was a model d... |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 195
| Haha...forgot about this thread. Well, the news is that I had that SH-2 until I sold it for a last-minute plane ticket to a friend's wedding. 2006. I probably missed the SH-2 the most, of all my synths. Mono/Poly was a close second. I now have the SH-2's forgotten brother- the SH-1. That is even truer to the modular lineage, and although losing an oscillator, has more options (hp filter, extra envelope adjustable ext. input, pink noise) It also produces the same chewy, fuzzy, lightning-fast bass as the SH-2, so I feel complete again. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,145
|
I just posted a thread yesterday asking about this Mod. Never got an answer. |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 417
|
I have two SH 09 instead of one SH 2. They sound identical to SH 2 minus oscillator, but I have both SH 09s connected with CV/Gate and I have a monster two oscillator, two filter monosynth.....which is way more powerful than one SH 2. They both have a small modification - noise generator is directly connected to an External input fader, as long as you don't plug a jack into external input. Essential modification for all Sh 09 - SH 2 owners. Plus that I changed all electrolytic capacitors with Panasonic FC. BIG CHANGE!!! Immediately when I bought first SH 09 , I played it side by side with SH 101, and in my opinion they can not be compared. SH 101 left my synth room soon after that. I bought another SH 09 and financed full restoration and modifications for both. Besides sounding bigger, rawer and punchier, I found SH 09 to be more musical and I could get sounds that " work" faster than on SH 101. Just My 2c G
__________________ Gregor Zemljic - http://www.gz-mastering.com |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2010
Posts: 86
| Please tell me more about the sh1 sound. I have an sh2 (wonderful!) and a sh101 and system100 but am really tempted by the sh1. Logically I see little reason to do it. How much different can it be from what I already have. But I still want to try one very badly.
__________________ mc202.com - my synth blog | Nisi Dominus Frustra |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2010
Posts: 86
| Quote:
Interesting. What type of change did the new caps give? Less noise? | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New ADI-2's Lenny and The Scapers | Unclenny | Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs | 0 | 28th November 2007 12:58 AM |
| Chandler LTD-2's ratio? | theAdmiral | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 27th March 2007 08:36 AM |
| why so many chandler tg-2's being sold? | fuzzface777 | High end | 27 | 20th January 2007 04:41 PM |
| PMC TB-2's vs ADAM S2.5's | machina_lines | High end | 22 | 30th April 2006 01:19 PM |
| |