Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th April 2009   #1
Lives for gear
 
golden beers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,351

Thread Starter
UAD plug-ins: 4K Channel Strip vs Neve 88RS Channel Strip

helloz.
i'm going to get one or the other of these. but which one!!?
give us your opinions slutz, what do you like/dislike about these and why?.

Universal Audio | UA 4K Channel Strip

Universal Audio | Neve 88RS
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by djugel View Post
The knob on the Source is perhaps the ballsiest knob ever made.
golden beers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009   #2
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 199

Buy both. In the end you will have all UAD's plugins

Just demo both of them and choose. It realy depends on the sound you want. Both are great. IMO 88RS sounds round and warm, and the 4K sounds crisp and upfront. But when you tweak them enough, you will get them sounding close, but just with a differend sound(color) to them.

It also depends on the UAD you have and how many instances you want to use.
barrythave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
Entrainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,426

I would go with SSL 4K.

Universal Audio | UAD Charts

This is due to the fact that it takes way more processing power to achieve than the Neve. This means they may actually be doing some form of modelling (like the 33609, Moog, 1081) vs using standard algorithms.

I think the 88RS uses the standard digital linear phase EQ that you can get anywhere for any price you are willing to pay. Check out the Digital EQ, Fact/Myth thread.
Digital EQ Fact & Myth.

You'll get less channels, but they would be more authentic.
Entrainer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
DanDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 788

I would say to buy the Neve 88RS, but thats only because I have experience with it. Never tried the 4k.
DanDaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
SWAN808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,872

depends...the 4k is punchier in its compressor-but the CPU usage is off the chart. I think that was a bit of a mis-step from UA to be honest...if anything needs to be low DSP its a channel strip IMO...but yes perhaps it has better quality for it.

The 88RS is really nice-it genuinely makes things sound smoother when its loaded in-and the compressor is great-I liked it even on busses. However it hasnt got the SSL punch or attitude if you are into that...

try them and see which you prefer?
SWAN808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
golden beers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,351

Thread Starter
hellos.
well this is an old thread.
i ended up not getting either for what it's worth
golden beers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 891

Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by golden beers View Post
helloz.
i'm going to get one or the other of these. but which one!!?
give us your opinions slutz, what do you like/dislike about these and why?.

Universal Audio | UA 4K Channel Strip

Universal Audio | Neve 88RS

Honors Degree: Comparison between the compressor and EQ of the Neve 88RS and the UAD-

Found: Neve OTB vs. UAD Neve ITB

i think the neve sounds better than the ssl.
the UAD neve better than the nebula,
also the uad fairchild sounds better than the waves or ik 670, for most things.
the trident-a its a dissapointmnet.
Dubai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2010   #8
Lives for gear
 
Entrainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,426

I'm really liking Duende X-EQ...

I've pretty much abandoned compression ITB, but X-Comp is good for certain things.

That's become my "channel strip", with some Nebula added.

More an Algorithmix channel strip than SSL, but SSL in distribution.

I get my color outside, so the X-EQ works well with my methods.
Entrainer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2010   #9
Gear addict
 
andivax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kiev/Ukraine
Posts: 449

Send a message via ICQ to andivax Send a message via MSN to andivax
neve and ssl is CHARACTER stuff.
i like sonnox dynamics for every-channel peaks killing.
33609 is killler plugin but CPU hog. i like it in the master bus.
__________________

www.ANDIVAXMASTERING.com - 50% discount

andivax is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAD Neve 88RS CHANNEL STRIP Night Stalker Music computers 15 3rd April 2008 02:10 PM
NEW PREAMP/CHANNEL STRIP VS. PLUG-INS? DIGI ENT Low End Theory 27 2nd August 2007 04:30 AM
Whats the vote on UAD The Neve 88RS Channel Strip Justice Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 16 27th July 2007 07:45 AM
Does anybody have both the URS and the 88RS Channel Strip??? camerondye So much gear, so little time! 1 13th July 2007 07:55 PM
Best native based channel strip plug-ins? wurpelizer So much gear, so little time! 29 28th May 2007 05:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.