![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 70
| Difference in sound between LM-1 and LinnDrum? Just wondering...Is there a significant difference between the sound of the Linn LM-1 drum machine and the LinnDrum? Do they use the same samples? I know the sample rate is different between the two machines. Does it add up to much? What about the difference between the Linn 9000 and the LinnDrum -- does it have the same sound? Alex.T |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 945
| dunno, but i can say having used one extensively that the linndrum is one of the most horrible sounds ever created from an electronic instrument i'd pay exactly 50 pence for one
__________________ www.7161.com Free music space for artists bands & deejays Free podcasting for artists, bands & deejays Free play/stream links - download links - podcast links No adverts - No pop-ups - No adverts |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,092
| well the linndrum don't like you either... |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Seattle USA
Posts: 2,752
| I love what Prince did with his Linn.
__________________ Myspace*Meriphew |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: paris, france
Posts: 492
| linndrums rule a ok m
__________________ it doesn't matter what knobs you have - its how you use them - almost... "After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music." - Aldous Huxley, 1931 |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Wallenhorst, Germany
Posts: 557
| I used to have a LinnDrum and really liked its sound. A friend of mine used to have both and kept the LM-1, he says the LinnDrum sounds weaker in comparison. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 945
| oh ha ha haaaa analogbass *slaps side with mirth*.. what a witty retort used one have u? (and i dont mean listened to samples of one or heard one for a short while) hmmm, i'm not argueing with you, it's just my experience of having to use one for a year every day almost. i didnt like it. the claps are quite nice and vicious, the tam sounds like someone shaking a baby rattle, the snare has like a nanosecond decay, the toms sound like ski yogurt pots, the kik is clicky and nasty... IMO.. look, sorry ok, i just cant help thinking SOLID by ashford and Simpson
__________________ www.7161.com Free music space for artists bands & deejays Free podcasting for artists, bands & deejays Free play/stream links - download links - podcast links No adverts - No pop-ups - No adverts |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 793
| I have all three. They sound very different to each other when using the stock sounds. The LM-1 is the shit ! It sounds freaking huge ! This is the Prince machine. Linndrum has such a polished sound. All sounds fit together. Lots of classic tracks from the eighties used this one. Linn 9000. Doesn´t sound as nice.....You must get one with a discdrive and a library. Then it becomes awesome. WT
__________________ Just a guy with a bunch of blue things.... |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: cloud nine
Posts: 3,192
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Seattle USA
Posts: 2,752
| I liked how you could open up the Linn Drum and change the tuning. It's a cool drum machine IMO, but it will definitely have a dated sound.
__________________ Myspace*Meriphew |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 945
| Quote:
yeah back in 83/4. at the time just remember the choices out there were limited, so it was very dynamic for the time albeit with short sample times i preferred the dmx myself but the studio had an eprom blower we could add our own samples and often we'd also trigger simmons brains from it as was the fashion then anyways as soon as the mirage came it blew people away even tho it was lofi. i just think you might as well use the samples for it... it has a sound yes, i aint argueing with that, but i dont think it's sound is devalued by using a very good quality sample set instead arrrr, those were the days :(
__________________ www.7161.com Free music space for artists bands & deejays Free podcasting for artists, bands & deejays Free play/stream links - download links - podcast links No adverts - No pop-ups - No adverts | |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| Quote:
The LM-1 and Linndrum share most of the same sounds! Therefore your friend is just silly. A few of them are different, such as the kick which is better on the Linndrum, and only a couple of sounds that are on one and not the other. The main advantage with the LM-1 is individual tuning of each sound vs. a universal adjustment for most of the Linndrum sounds. Not a huge difference. I'll take the Linndrum it's still the best-sounding stand-alone drum machine ever made. It fell out of favor after the mid-1980s when cheap Rolands came into vogue, not because they sounded better. | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| Quote:
Prince still uses his LM-1s because the feel's still the best around after all this time. He substitutes the chips just because of those here and elsewhere who dismiss the stock sounds as too 80s, not because they sound bad. They sound better than most of the sounds heard now actually. | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 793
| ![]() Well.....that´s just bollocks. The LM-1 and the Linndrum sounds way different. There isn´t a single sample that is identical when comparing the stock sounds that they shipped with. WT
__________________ Just a guy with a bunch of blue things.... |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| Quote:
Just applying common sense would tell you that they had a winning formula with the LM-1, then made a sleeker package with the Linndrum - would've made NO sense to change all the sounds that were well-received on the LM-1. Common sense. I'm guessing you've either lost some hearing or never had a good ear. | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 793
| Well......whatever...... Guess I´ll go and compare some sounds then. youWT
__________________ Just a guy with a bunch of blue things.... |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| Classy; he loses then resorts to a pissing contest to try to make up for bad judgement LOL |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 793
| Troll WT
__________________ Just a guy with a bunch of blue things.... |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 793
| Chill dude, what´s up with the attitude ? WT
__________________ Just a guy with a bunch of blue things.... |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 815
| WT ...fight fight fight ![]() ![]() ![]() i love my LinnDRUM..and soon I will have LM -1 too ![]() this boxes are heroes |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 793
| Hell yeah ! Report back when you´ve compared these identical sounding beasts ! lol WT
__________________ Just a guy with a bunch of blue things.... |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,092
| anyone have a .pdf of the Linndrum manual please? |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 793
| Yahoo! Groups - Join or create groups, clubs, forums & communities Linndrum users group. There you´ll find the manual for the machine that sounds exactly as its predecessor. WT
__________________ Just a guy with a bunch of blue things.... |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| |
| | |
| | #27 | |||
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 945
| Quote:
i'm going on this premise; that they arent in any way 'realistic', and yet also they dont offer much creativity if looked at in terms of them a non realistic unit but which can make plenty of sounds with layering and detuning etc i do however concede that yes they were quite a decent 'realistic' step up from a 606 or some of the more obscure boom-tish boxes of that era which were affordable, and i think it's that which gave them the rep they had at the time but which now is overated Quote:
![]() Quote:
anyways no argument man, we're all just expressing our opinion of how they sound.
__________________ www.7161.com Free music space for artists bands & deejays Free podcasting for artists, bands & deejays Free play/stream links - download links - podcast links No adverts - No pop-ups - No adverts | |||
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,037
| I never got on with the linn drum either BUT it does have a certain groove. The factory sounds were pretty nasty after a while I thought. Then again, I was SO HAPPY that I got my 808 from the guy who was upgrading to a linn drum .... Having said that, it was used on countless popular tracks, but I just felt you needed to really process it in thw studio to get anything out of it. I find lots of the cool prince drum tracks sound like Fairlight samples... |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| Quote:
20 years of revisionist thinking have us believing that the Rolands that were mainly laughable facsimilies of the real deal are desirable. | |
| | |
| | #30 | ||
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 745
| Quote:
The Linn did and still does do some of the best sounds out there; all through the 80s some of the sounds were considered better than most efforts at milking real drums. Any rhetoric now about the Linn's sounds has almost entirely to do with "sounding 80s", not much to do with the sounds themselves. The Rolands on the other hand never came close to the real thing, became popular due to affordability initially, and then later during their rennaisance when reverse chic came in, became in bizarre fashion desirable. Because everyone was using one, not because they sounded better than other machines. Quote:
If there were more onus on sounding realistic over the last 20 years instead of sounding like a cheesy Roland, the entire production aesthetic of the last 20 years would be quite different in various musical genres. The Rolands were for the most part a fashion statement, not a musical step forward | ||
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The difference between the API and Neve sound. Fun and Enlightening. | Jonk | So much gear, so little time! | 63 | 24th March 2009 08:29 AM |
| Difference in sound of PT playback vs sound of PT input | Lawson | Music computers | 3 | 20th September 2008 04:53 PM |
| The difference in sound in iTunes & DAW | murrayhill | Music computers | 13 | 29th October 2006 11:10 PM |
| Difference in sound between the MPC60 and MPC4000? | RIZ Records | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 23 | 5th February 2006 08:13 PM |
| Sound difference between SM7 & SM7b | VO-Guy | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 7th August 2005 11:39 PM |