Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th July 2007   #1
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22

Thread Starter
Do CD's Still Make Sense

I was talking to someone today who is starting a label, and she said she will not be doing anything with CD's or any hardware medium (vinyl...) at all, they will just be doing digital, spending their resources marketing digital downloads.

Obviously a trend. Do you think making an actual CD is passe?
moderngroove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007   #2
Gear addict
 
Greg_KPX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 412

Send a message via MSN to Greg_KPX
Personally I love cd's! They are a great backup and you can rip them to mp3 yourself if you need to...

I'm not completely happy with downloads only but it works... I've bought quite a bit of music online. Just have to make sure to keep all your tracks organised and keep backups.
Greg_KPX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007   #3
Lives for Jesus
 
stevep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: orange county ca.
Posts: 2,935

Cool

Why limit yourself to downloads ?

I know lots of artists, bands that sell there own CDs at shows and the web;
they sell lots of them and dont have any label to pay off

I just finished a project a few months ago that went to Vinyl and these kids were all under 18



dont limit yourself



.
stevep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007   #4
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 213

The future of music is most likely neither in physical mediums (CDs, vinyl) nor in downloads (mp3, aac etc). The future of music fruition is most likely in streaming... There will be a day when bandwidth won't be an issue anymore and instead of having to own (and store) files you will just be able to stream from the web... We will be online everywhere we are and we will pay a service fee for unlimited access to a huge database of music. Why own when you can hear anything you want anytime you want without having to own anything?
marcnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007   #5
Gear maniac
 
Luko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 155

Send a message via AIM to Luko Send a message via MSN to Luko
^^ interesting outlook on the future there mate

its certainly within the realms of possibility I will say that

but i would also say that while poeple still fall in love with bands and artists they still want to 'own' a piece of them and to most thats getting the cd or LP from the store

even now, I find myself (as a 100% downloader these days) that when i ask my friends this question they surprise me by saying they still buy all the cd's of their favourite artist's

definetly still viable as the best way to promote yourself at gigs etc..
Luko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
Beermaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,065

It never ceases to amaze me that as our industry is gearing up to higher resolutions of recordings with 96K upwards becoming more the norm that the consumer end of things is gearing DOWN to MP3s !

Give me CD every time then I can make an MP3 for my pod when and If I need to. The problem with only MP3 distribution is that the consumer is stuck with that one format. Yeah you can put it on your pod but how about taking on a journey in a friends car ? How about taking it to any other number of places that don't have HiFis with Aux inputs for your ipod output.

Above all - Where's the artwork and sleeve info about the band and where it was recorded, who plays on it and who mixed it and the lyrics etc . Isn't it great to be listening to tracks and reading up on the sleeve notes who's playing and when ! ?

MP3 download - cheap an cheerful but not much to it for the price.
Beermaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
Strobian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 856

The dance music market is a tough industry, and most new labels will go under doing vinyl these days. It still sells well for some labels, but most kids are downloading MP3 now. I personally like the WAV files or CD, yeah the artwork is cool, hardcopy etc...I like that. However, when I started my label up a year ago, I went all download. Depending on what you are doing, hardcopy sounds the best to me, but the Wav file option is just the same really. Its harder to fall in love with a download, but times are changing and i've only had a couple requests for CD's along the way, but they are viable still I believe. How can you resist the artwork, packaging, etc etc...
__________________
Best Regards.

Let the ear be the final judge.

http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Dynamics-Audio-Mastering/142816939085810
Strobian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Stevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,169

more of a nitche market these days. audiophiles, collectors, true supportive fans.
until some other physical medium surpases it in sound quality & popularity I think it will still be a valid format for people who make & buy albums.
Stevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007   #9
Gear Guru
 
chrisso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 15,358

I think the lady shows a lot of business sense.
Tower Records went under. FOP, a major UK chain, just went under.
The reality is, music is selling much less, and when it is selling it's being downloaded as one or two tracks, not a whole album.
I love CD's, but there is a vastly different reality out there.
__________________
Chris Whitten
chrisso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007   #10
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 478

As long as the CD player is still widely used, there will be a use for CDs, I think many people would not bother putting all their downloaded tracks to CD. Flash memory players are pretty cool as long as they don't rely on compressed data formats to the detriment of sound quality. I suppose in the near future the next hi-resolution audio format CDs will probably exceed realtime internet streaming sound quality, but that could be eclipsed at a certain point with the bandwidth, then everything will likely be surround sound, etc. who knows. .

Also the flow of a full album is a nice thing to have, but I suppose all the artist has to do is present the tracks together in a certain order, then the listener has to figure out how to work their media player correctly. The delicate nature of the CD optics and the wastefulness of all that discarded plastic won't be missed too much I suppose.
andrewsc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2007   #11
Lives for gear
 
The Architecture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 963

Send a message via AIM to The Architecture Send a message via Yahoo to The Architecture
I can't warm up to buying downloadable music. for one, why should I pay a dollar a song if its sound is inferior to CD quality?

If CD's don't make sense, then I wouldn't be concerned about working on a good quality cd then.
__________________
"if your an engineer you know how important it is to have good looking knobs" Dave Pensado
The Architecture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2007   #12
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 270

Red face

I keep wondering when a hi-fidelity storage format is gonna come out for audio. Even DVD's compress the audio. I remember back in the 90s they were promissing DVD-Audio to come out, but it never did.

I would be content if we had Universal DVD players that played ISO CD-ROMs with 24 bit .WAV files at a variety of sampling rates.
MrHope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: portugal
Posts: 1,140

I believe that a new medium should be used... Something like a usb pen...
nandoanalog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2007   #14
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Murfreesboro, TN, USA
Posts: 51

I'd say it all depends on the market. I live in a college town where a good many of the kids are art students, music business, or music engineering students. Most of us have an iPod and a turntable. Many of the engineering kids, like myself, rip CDs through lossless codecs, because we've been trained to hear the artifacts produced by an MP3. I notice fewer artifacts in bitrate-reduced streaming radio that I listen to, though. If I were in a big city where all the music consumers had MP3 players in their phones or whatever, my answer might be different.

Because of the cost of production and the market penetration of CD players, I would still go with CDs right now. One of my favorites (which I've mostly seen on big label releases) is the vinyl record with a free digital download attached via a card in the shrinkwrap. Of course, I listen most in my car, so I still buy CDs, predominantly.
__________________
"One never knows, do one?" - Junior Gorg
golden_goose42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2007   #15
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22

Thread Starter
Well, it is kind of depressing, a little bit.

In LA, lots of the great stores closed... aarons, tower, hear music (bought by starbucks)... leaves you basically with virgin, best buy, and borders...

None of those places even stocks my genre, so, what good would a cd do me anyway?

I just spent $300 bucks getting a tune mastered by the top cat in the uk... I guess that was a waste of money, considering probably the only person who can hear the difference between the mastered version and the unmastered version is me, and then only if i play back the original 96khz file on the monitors it was mixed on.

Certainly there is no way you could catch it on myspace or streaming or download...

There is ONE thing i would like to say that bothers me about downloads, though.

Back in the days of vinyl, you could order, say, 1k vinyls, ship them to the distributor, and call in 90 days or so and say, hey, i sent you 1k units, i've got the shipping receipt right here, where's my money?

Now, though, you upload a track to a site... how in the world can you track the actual number of downloads the site sells?

I mean, seems to me they can just pull an arbitrary number out of the sky and unless you go and see their billing records, you can never tell for sure...

Another way for the musician to get screwed? looks like it.

We released a tune that was a mini-hit and we haven't received a penny on it... not one cent... despite the fact that it can be downloaded everywhere...

Who's got time / money to chase down these sites?
moderngroove is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
does this make sense? A/D converter question.. mister So much gear, so little time! 3 19th July 2007 01:07 AM
does a tracking comp make much sense? salomonander High end 9 10th July 2007 08:01 AM
Does this technique make sense? Alécio Costa Mastering forum 4 19th January 2007 10:53 PM
does that make any good sense to you?.. suggestions please activexjava So much gear, so little time! 4 1st December 2006 01:12 PM
does this publishing scenario make sense? quincyg So much gear, so little time! 3 1st September 2006 07:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:48 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.