Thin Heads Sound Better - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time! > Sub forums > Drums!

Thin Heads Sound Better
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st June 2011   #1
Gear addict
 
Slap Back's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 406

Thread Starter
Thin Heads Sound Better

Everytime I put on thick drumheads.. I realize how great the thin ones sound. Just sayin...
__________________


Slap Back is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2011   #2
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 196

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slap Back View Post
Everytime I put on thick drumheads.. I realize how great the thin ones sound. Just sayin...
Thick heads feel better tho'.

Thats what she said.
JohnChips is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2011   #3
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 400

Sound better than what and for what purpose? Depends on the sound you are going for. Thick or thin are neither better nor worse, just different.

Thick = longer sustain/decay, usually better pitch centering and focus, greater durability so the head will hopefully sound the same after the 100th hit as it does after the 1st.

Thin = shorter sustain/decay, brighter harmonics, a little harder to tune and balance, greater elasticity - meaning the head will be toast a little sooner and dent easily.

And let's not confuse thick with 2-ply, they are totally different animals. If thin heads were all that, the stock heads on those luan k-mart kits would be all the rage.
Gamelan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2011   #4
Gear addict
 
Philip S Bova's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa

The thicker the head the more you hear of the head versus the actual drum...more of a "plastic" sound especially on toms and bass drums. I prefer ambassadors all around even on kick. Mind you I try not to be a really hitter these days.
__________________
www.philipshawbova.com
Philip S Bova is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2011   #5
Gear addict
 
Philip S Bova's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamelan View Post

And let's not confuse thick with 2-ply, they are totally different animals. If thin heads were all that, the stock heads on those luan k-mart kits would be all the rage.
but to be fair those single ply heads that come with starter kits are not quality single ply heads. They suck.
Philip S Bova is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2011   #6
Gear addict
 
valjean24601's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 384

Thin heads (single ply such as Remo ambassadors) tend to sound their best when used on drums that have thinner shells. I have a Pearl Masterworks kit with 4 ply shells on all the toms and the thin heads work amazing well with them. However when I put 2 ply heads on the kit it starts to choke the sound a little bit more.

Cheers, Mark.
__________________
Check out my tracks online, all performing, singing, recording and mixing done by me in my home studio.

http://soundcloud.com/white-male-actors/sets
valjean24601 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2011   #7
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 400

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip S Bova View Post
but to be fair those single ply heads that come with starter kits are not quality single ply heads. They suck.
Of course, but they're really thin! (it was a joking attempt to illustrate a point)

Note that ambassador weight is the thickest single ply head you can get. A 2 ply head is not a thicker head, it's two thin heads stuck together (same with pinstripes). Naturally, friction between the 2 layers reduces resonance.
Gamelan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2011   #8
Gear nut
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 120

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamelan View Post
Note that ambassador weight is the thickest single ply head you can get.
Actually REMO Ambassador X and EVANS G Plus are, they're 12-mil single ply, while classic Ambassador And G1 are 10-mil.
(BTW I'd avoid the Coated G Plus, great focused sound but no attack at all.)
Pawel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2011   #9
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 400

Ah yes, the X's are indeed 12 mil.

Thanks for the correction, but do consider softening the 'tude a bit.
Gamelan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2011   #10
Gear nut
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 120

Sorry, didn't mean to be rude

It's hard to correct someone and not look like an a-hole!
Pawel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2011   #11
Gear addict
 
valjean24601's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 384

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamelan View Post
Ah yes, the X's are indeed 12 mil.

Thanks for the correction, but do consider softening the 'tude a bit.
Just because someone points out an error you've made and corrects you doesn't mean they've got a bad attitude! If anything he then tried to assist you by making a suggestion about another head.
valjean24601 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2011   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,837

No kidding, how could the "tude" be any softer?
kats is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2011   #13
Gear addict
 
Slap Back's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 406

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamelan View Post
Sound better than what and for what purpose? Depends on the sound you are going for. Thick or thin are neither better nor worse, just different.

Thick = longer sustain/decay, usually better pitch centering and focus, greater durability so the head will hopefully sound the same after the 100th hit as it does after the 1st.

Thin = shorter sustain/decay, brighter harmonics, a little harder to tune and balance, greater elasticity - meaning the head will be toast a little sooner and dent easily.

And let's not confuse thick with 2-ply, they are totally different animals. If thin heads were all that, the stock heads on those luan k-mart kits would be all the rage.
No confusion

Thin heads = G1's ambassadors, etc
Thick heads = G2's Pinstripes, etc

From any practical perspective, # of plies is an irrelevant point.

Thin heads let drums sing more in every way. Thick heads interefere with drums sounding good.
Slap Back is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2011   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,067

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slap Back View Post
No confusion

Thin heads = G1's ambassadors, etc
Thick heads = G2's Pinstripes, etc

From any practical perspective, # of plies is an irrelevant point.

Thin heads let drums sing more in every way. Thick heads interefere with drums sounding good.
Well - I'm going to politely disagree. It depends on the drum.. some work better than others with thinner or thicker head. It also depends on the sound you're going for - thin isn't always that sound.

For a good example - lots of people consider the Bonham sound as the holy grail of rock drums... he ran coated Emperors (2-ply) and his drums sang quite well.
__________________
"Seriously, there's a certain kind of creative inspiration that can come from exploring the outer limits of a musical instrument. Now days the limits are so vast that it can be difficult to set boundaries." --spargee
biggator6 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2011   #15
Gear addict
 
Slap Back's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 406

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggator6 View Post
Well - I'm going to politely disagree. It depends on the drum.. some work better than others with thinner or thicker head. It also depends on the sound you're going for - thin isn't always that sound.

For a good example - lots of people consider the Bonham sound as the holy grail of rock drums... he ran coated Emperors (2-ply) and his drums sang quite well.
Point well taken-- for me, it seems like every time I try some thicker heads, I just end up with less of everything and I'm running back to Ambassadors in no time. I'd be interested to know your opinion about situations when thick is definitely the sound and why-- where an ambassador just wouldn't do and why

What would be an example of a drum that sounds better with a thicker head...same with a thinner head? What sort of qualites about these different drums make them more suited to thicker or thinner heads?

That is an excellent point about Bonahm. I do wonder though if ambassadors would have sounded even better on his kit and also how much durability played a factor in his choice of Emperors over Ambassadors.

Several other drummers that I've spoken with over the years who play Emperors feel that Ambassadors sound better, but just don't last long enough.
Slap Back is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2011   #16
Gear addict
 
Slap Back's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 406

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip S Bova View Post
The thicker the head the more you hear of the head versus the actual drum...more of a "plastic" sound especially on toms and bass drums. I prefer ambassadors all around even on kick. Mind you I try not to be a really hitter these days.
Thats an interesting way to look at it. I really want to put an ambassador on my Yamaha Recording Custom kick. I had an Emad without the dampening ring on it and that was great. Then I put my Powerstroke 3 back on... again I felt like that was a step back with those outer dampening plies on the outer edge of the PS3.
Slap Back is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2011   #17
Gear nut
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 120

I have a '94 Cherry Recording Custom and a 2003 Matte Sedona Red Oak Custom: the first sounds better with Emperors, the second with Ambassadors. For "better" I mean fuller and richer sound, more sustain, more pleasant to the ear, drum singing better. Ambassadors on the Recording Custom are a bit dead, while Emperors on the Oak choke them (always coated heads on batter, clear Ambassadors as resonants and same tuning).
I also find that Emperors ring more than Ambassadors, which have slightly more bass (due to single-ply) and a more focused sound, while I always read that it's supposed to be the other way around.
Ambassadors can be played softer with great results and tone, while Emperors ask to be played harder to sound equally good (maybe due to the dampening effect of the friction between the two plies). I think that number of plies really affects the sound.

I tried lots of different heads and combinations and found what is best for my drums. I think that Yamaha sells RC with Clear Pinstripes and Oaks with Clear Ambassadors for a reason
Pawel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2011   #18
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,067

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slap Back View Post
Point well taken-- for me, it seems like every time I try some thicker heads, I just end up with less of everything and I'm running back to Ambassadors in no time. I'd be interested to know your opinion about situations when thick is definitely the sound and why-- where an ambassador just wouldn't do and why

What would be an example of a drum that sounds better with a thicker head...same with a thinner head? What sort of qualites about these different drums make them more suited to thicker or thinner heads?

That is an excellent point about Bonahm. I do wonder though if ambassadors would have sounded even better on his kit and also how much durability played a factor in his choice of Emperors over Ambassadors.

Several other drummers that I've spoken with over the years who play Emperors feel that Ambassadors sound better, but just don't last long enough.
Well.. I'll speak to my two kits (and possibly snares).

My vintage Rogers kit.. Ambassadors. That's just the 'classic' sound. It works.

My modern kit (Premier Signia) is very resonant.. thin shells, sharp bearing edges. I ran it with Ambassadors - and every tom required muffling to be bearable. Then I switched the floors to Emperors, they were much better. When it came time to replace heads - I tried a few different ones and ended up with Evans clear G2s.. it's exactly the sound I was looking for - no muffling needed. On that kit, I wanted a more 'modern' sound.. very focused and heavy on the attack. My ideal tom sound for this kit would be 'Lateralus' by Tool - the G2s get me in the ballpark.
biggator6 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2011   #19
Gear nut
 
bom619's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 83

Send a message via AIM to bom619
Thin heads are better

Most of the time, drummers will choose heads that sound good from the playing position with no regard to the low end proximity effect of close mics or the musical balance of the shells vs cymbals in the room. Every small advantage you can achieve to fight cymbal bleed and proximity effect will make the end result better. Thinner and brighter heads make a significant difference!

If you have bent hoops or bent drums (vistalite's for instance) thicker heads will make tuning easier but at the cost of volume & tone. I haven't found many other exceptions other than stylistic variations to accommodate music genres.
bom619 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2011   #20
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 28

Vintage Ambassador Coated on Top and
Ambassador Coated on Bottom. Super fat vintage or round resonate tones. For toms at least. Anything goes for kick and snare, whatever fits the song!
lunchbox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2011   #21
Lives for gear
 
AudioWonderland's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 952

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamelan View Post
If thin heads were all that, the stock heads on those luan k-mart kits would be all the rage.

Lets also not confuse thin with junk..
AudioWonderland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2011   #22
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 67

I find it interesting that no one has mentioned aquairian. I play a masters mmx with uncoated or coated ec2's on the toms, g1 coated only on snare, and aquairian super kick 2 on kick. Tried emad, powerstroke and just about everything else and nothing comes close to the superkick 2. Aquairian suck everywhere else though.
Animal2612 is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Making thin vocal sound bigger (what gear would you recommend?) audionickw So much gear, so little time! 66 24th April 2012 09:16 AM
Thin piano sound when distant micing npulsipher Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 59 11th May 2011 10:34 PM
Tilting my head down sounds better? recordinghopkins Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 7 26th February 2010 03:19 PM
Speaker 'load" / soak boxes for guitar amp heads? Ever better than a mic?- Jules So much gear, so little time! 21 4th April 2003 11:41 PM
Speaker 'load" / soak boxes for guitar amp heads? Ever better than a mic?- Jules Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) 10 2nd April 2003 02:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.