How important is audio quality? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Downloads, the future - Q&A forum with expert guests from CD Baby, Tunecore and Nimbit


How important is audio quality?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th November 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
andychamp's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Posts: 2,872

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to andychamp
How important is audio quality?

In your experience, how much do the downloaders/buyers care about audio quality?
When given a choice, what is their favorite format/resolution/bitrate?
How much does pricing influence this decision?

Or is it really "only about the song"?
__________________
André
___________________________________________
"Recording exactly what a musician hears turns out to be a really big deal." Bob Olhsson
"Who cares about efficiency, when we're talking about music?" Rupert Neve
"it'll sound different through a microphone, anyway
" Keith Carlock

"no room, no boom!" Michael Wagener
andychamp is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2007   #2
Peter Wells, SVP Operations, Customer Advocate - Tunecore
 
PeterTuneCore's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 91

Gnereally, if a fan downloads a song and isn't happy with the quality, we don't hear about it, because the fan contacts the store.

But we can infer that quality is important, which is why iTunes, the biggest store, has started iTunes Plus with increased bitrate for better quality. There must have been demand...

--Peter
peter@tunecore.com
PeterTuneCore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2007   #3
Founder CD Baby
 
Derek Sivers's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 75

Smile how much do the downloaders/buyers care about audio quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by andychamp View Post
how much do the downloaders/buyers care about audio quality? what is their favorite format/resolution/bitrate? How much does pricing influence this decision?
Be careful when you find yourself thinking of "buyers" or "they".

Instead, think of each of your fans.

How much does Tracy care about audio quality?
What is Camille's favorite format?
How about Brian?
What bitrate does Amber prefer?

The answer, of course, is that some care, some don't, some want choice, some want you to tell them what to do.

The lovely thing about this electronic world is that you don't have to manufacture more of one thing or decide in advance how many of a product to ship to Chicago.

Give choices, so that people can decide.

And provide a preference for those that want you to choose for them.

It's an artistic decision on your part, same as the choices you make while recording. Even, perhaps, deciding NOT to give them a choice would be your artistic decision (providing WAV-only), if you want your fellow audiophiles would applaud you.

It's wrongly simplistic to only think of "them".

(This applies to communicating with your fans, too. When you write an email to your list, don't write it to "them", write it to Amber, Brian, Camille, David, etc.)
__________________
--
Derek Sivers, president, CD Baby, HostBaby
http://www.cdbaby.com http://www.hostbaby.com
Derek Sivers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2007   #4
Founder, CEO, President - Tunecore
 
Jeff Price's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 39

I really love my vinyl - nothing sounds better, warmer, fatter... the EQ range is broader, I even love the clicks and pops.

However, it seems that people buy music based on other criteria aside from "what sounds the best"

Point in case is the Sony Walkman. Prior to the advent of the Walkman, cassettes were approximately 2% of the marketplace. Vinyl dominated and 8 track was in there as well.

Compared to vinyl, most cassettes sound horrible, and prior to Dolby Noise Reduction, they sounded even worse (although the original Dolby noise reduction also seemed to suck all the high end out of a recording). However, once the Walkmen was introduced to the world cassettes jumped to almost 50% market share.

Why? They sure don't sound better. You can't stare at the album art the way you would a 12" vinyl album. It was the convenience factor and portability. For the first time it was easy to bring your own music with you and listen to it in your own self contained world (I remember the first time I got my Walkmen and popped in my English Beat cassette. A very magical moment).

Convenience and portability trumped sound quality. And the same seems to hold true for the general population. For most people, the difference between a 128 kps MP3 and a WAV on their headphones sounds more or less the same to them. Besides, they get what they really want, something the size of a pack of cigarettes holds thousands of songs. Instant portable of all their music wherever they go.

I believe there is a base line to the minimum quality of the music that people will accept, and its pretty low. Convenience, costs and portability will always trump as criteria

And remember, even the best recorded, mixed, mastered and EQ-ed songs at the highest bit rate possible will still sound mediocre if the headphones (or speakers) are not up to speed. And most of the world is used to the quality of the iPod headphones.

Jeff Price
TuneCore
TuneCorner
Jeff Price is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2007   #5
Gear maniac
 
Larrysings's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 247

[QUOTE=Jeff Price;1649614]I really love my vinyl - nothing sounds better, warmer, fatter... the EQ range is broader, I even love the clicks and pops.

However, it seems that people buy music based on other criteria aside from "what sounds the best"

Point in case is the Sony Walkman. Prior to the advent of the Walkman, cassettes were approximately 2% of the marketplace. Vinyl dominated and 8 track was in there as well.

Compared to vinyl, most cassettes sound horrible, and prior to Dolby Noise Reduction, they sounded even worse (although the original Dolby noise reduction also seemed to suck all the high end out of a recording). However, once the Walkmen was introduced to the world cassettes jumped to almost 50% market share.

Why? They sure don't sound better. You can't stare at the album art the way you would a 12" vinyl album. It was the convenience factor and portability. For the first time it was easy to bring your own music with you and listen to it in your own self contained world (I remember the first time I got my Walkmen and popped in my English Beat cassette. A very magical moment).

Convenience and portability trumped sound quality. And the same seems to hold true for the general population. For most people, the difference between a 128 kps MP3 and a WAV on their headphones sounds more or less the same to them. Besides, they get what they really want, something the size of a pack of cigarettes holds thousands of songs. Instant portable of all their music wherever they go.

I believe there is a base line to the minimum quality of the music that people will accept, and its pretty low. Convenience, costs and portability will always trump as criteria

And remember, even the best recorded, mixed, mastered and EQ-ed songs at the highest bit rate possible will still sound mediocre if the headphones (or speakers) are not up to speed. And most of the world is used to the quality of the iPod headphones.

Jeff Price
TuneCore
TuneCorner[/QUOTe


Soooo...Sad how the human species is devolving aurally and spiritually(read: not caring about the "actual" sonic excellence or artistry put into a recording). We are becoming a complacent, a.d.d. afflicted, overweight, undereducated, bunch of couch potatoes. Where multiple stimuli on any level is suitable enough to satisfy the saccharine craving for us to fill a banal moment in time. I love the convenience of my Ipod at the gym, but do all I can to hear the nuances of my music when enjoying the art form.
__________________
Larry Hammel

Vocalist/Producer/CEO
Deepwave Music Productions
http://www.deepwavemusic.com
Long Island City/NYC
Larrysings is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's more important, Quality or Quantity when it comes to being a Gearslutz? Remoteness Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 42 13th August 2011 08:43 PM
Is audio quality really that important? nobo So much gear, so little time! 41 4th August 2007 08:11 AM
audio quality in itunes Doozer Music computers 3 27th November 2006 04:09 PM
Honestly, how important are audio converters??? Reag1502 Music computers 45 21st September 2006 08:20 AM
The most important NON-AUDIO piece of gear... Riad So much gear, so little time! 48 17th December 2004 05:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.