Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Downloads, the future - Q&A forum with expert guests from CD Baby, Tunecore and Nimbit

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Theft And File Sharing AudioFocus So much gear, so little time! 2 9th October 2007 11:15 AM
Remote file sharing/server access uptoolate So much gear, so little time! 4 12th May 2007 04:08 PM
File sharing for .mov (quicktime) files, how do I do it? jgrif08 Music computers 1 24th November 2006 04:02 AM
Frank Zappa Invented File Sharing? Vermeer So much gear, so little time! 8 8th January 2005 11:53 PM
idisk file sharing bjornson Music computers 3 16th November 2003 12:08 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 30th November 2007, 09:07 PM   #31
OxfordFishSalon
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 24
The free exchange of information on a global scale an inevitability. You can call file sharing 'stealing' all you want, it's just a subjective label. What holds actual relevance is that free exchange of information exists for most of the world and will only expand from here.

This sucks and is totally unfair for people who have built their careers in an outdated paradigm- but getting pissy and suing people, or trying to instate laws that regulate the flow of information, is akin to building your house in front of a dam that's already cracked plus the weather's reporting record setting storms starting tomorrow.

The music industry is obviously in a flux right now; the only certainty is that those who fight change and refuse to adapt will lose more and more until they cut their losses and rethink their approach.
OxfordFishSalon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2007, 11:48 PM   #32
SC73
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5
Hello all. I usually just read the posts and never comment, but I can't help myself. I agree in most part that the music industry has some issues to resolve and that the major labels have created most of their own heart ache via standard / traditional business practices. However, this issue of piracy or information sharing (whichever you prefer), should not be a debate. I just don't understand how people can justify this behavior because everyone is doing it? You can't go to your local store and take whatever you want for free just because they gave you a sample, at least not without legal consequence. I think it boils down to greed, lack of ethics and culture. In our society, we have been conditioned to rebel against authority and consume things with no regard to others as long as there is a profit to be made.
SC73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2007, 11:50 PM   #33
herecomesyourman
Gear addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 407
I have several things I'd like to say...but this first post is one that I'd like to make specifically because we never really nail this one to the wall in any discussion. (Music industry people who aren't part of the majors that is)

Brand led marketing is a big problem here too. I think people are worn out on the majors banking on pushing a new artist for a couple of singles...while over saturating the radio and TV market with the same tiny play list. Clear Channel Broadcasting has a lot of answer for too. It's too expensive for indie artists to break into, and the exposure is great...but it's also so expensive that people are growing bored with the lack of diverse content. They're losing listeners. Hell they lost me almost ten years ago. But now they're numbers are way down.

You can complain about file sharing all you want. But it's not like the songs people are stealing are genius. It's all calculated pop formulas that have been overused to an extent that most top 40 singles resemble nursery rhymes more than songs. The American consumer is being told that he / she is too stupid to like anything different, and they've grown tired of being treated like idiots. I think the buying public is smarter than that, and wants new technology and mass media merging into to cool new forms of entertainment that feature music. I think that great bands landing TV and film soundtrack work have been huge for digital download sales on ITunes and the like because of this. I'm sorry that an American Idol winner can't be the voice of a generation, but that involves actually nurturing musical genius from time to time.
herecomesyourman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 12:57 AM   #34
Cellotron
Lives for gear
 
Cellotron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Price View Post
I wanted to throw in my $0.02 here.

Some quick stats: over 50% of spinART Records (my former label) album sales for the past three years occurred in iTunes US.

Yes, 50%.

Digital sales are NOT some small % of the market place.

This year alone TuneCore customers - which is a VERY small % of all music creators - will sell (or stream for revenue) over 10 million songs.

between TuneCore, CD Baby and Nimbit you are looking at between 30 - 40 million songs generating DIRECT revenue for tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of ARTISTS.

This represent approximately $18,000,000 to $22,000,000 in FOUND revenue. Without companies like TuneCore, CD Baby and Nimbit this revenue would not have existed.

On a quick side not, the RIAA states in large letters on its homepage that:

" RIAA members create, manufacture and/or distribute approximately 90% of all legitimate sound recordings produced and sold in the US"

I believe this to be dead wrong. I suspect that over 99% of the users of TuneCore, CD Baby and Nimbit are NOT RIAA members.

I now believe they RIAA represents LESS than 10% of all those that create manufacture and/or distribute approximately all legitimate sound recordings produced and sold in the US.
Jeff / Derek -
I was wondering if CD Baby & Tunecore report sales to the RIAA for their mid-year and year end "U.S. Manufacturers' Unit Shipments and Value Charts" - RIAA

If not - I'm wondering if you have ever contacted them regarding this as I believe (unless I'm mistaken) that they are interested in having the most accurate figures available that they can (which would hopefully mean more accurate reporting of independents).

Best regards,
Steve Berson
Cellotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 01:23 AM   #35
drundall
Lives for gear
 
drundall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 789
Send a message via MSN to drundall
All I can say is wait 'til the bandwidth can support widespread and quick downloading of movies, wait and see what the MPAA will do.

Also everyone I knew who had a thriving independent label is now done except one. From my perspective indie music is not well at all. Major label satellites not included.
__________________
Darian Rundall
drundall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 10:21 AM   #36
Volodia
Lives for gear
 
Volodia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Paris
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by herecomesyourman View Post

You can complain about file sharing all you want. But it's not like the songs people are stealing are genius. It's all calculated pop formulas that have been overused to an extent that most top 40 singles resemble nursery rhymes more than songs. The American consumer is being told that he / she is too stupid to like anything different, and they've grown tired of being treated like idiots. I think the buying public is smarter than that, and wants new technology and mass media merging into to cool new forms of entertainment that feature music. I think that great bands landing TV and film soundtrack work have been huge for digital download sales on ITunes and the like because of this. I'm sorry that an American Idol winner can't be the voice of a generation, but that involves actually nurturing musical genius from time to time.
I'm sorry but this argument is not valid . If it was, the songs shared illegaly would be different than the hits but they are not . People download the hits more than anything else . The more you sell the more you're pirated .

And about information being shared ,I don't consider music as information but as a product like movies . It shouldn't be treated as free information .
__________________
"Could anyone please post an A/B comparison of the 'pull the blanket of the speaker' effect?" Jamzone
Volodia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 07:52 PM   #37
Derek Sivers
Founder CD Baby
 
Derek Sivers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 75
Smile report sales to the RIAA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cellotron View Post
(does CD Baby) report sales to the RIAA
Not at all, no.

CD Baby reports all sales from our store (cdbaby.com) to SoundScan, but I think all sales reporting is the responsibility of the store, not the distributor. (So, iTunes is probably reporting their sales to SoundScan, etc.)

I think the RIAA gathers info from SoundScan. I had never heard of the RIAA chart you're mentioning, but since the RIAA is just a coalition of the big labels I don't see why I should be reporting my sales to them, or speaking to them in any way.
__________________
--
Derek Sivers, president, CD Baby, HostBaby
http://www.cdbaby.com http://www.hostbaby.com
Derek Sivers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0