Login / Register
 
Cubase more focussed on PC than ever before?
New Reply
Subscribe
CJ1973
Thread Starter
#1
4th December 2012
Old 4th December 2012
  #1
Lives for gear
 
CJ1973's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,208

Thread Starter
CJ1973 is offline
Cubase more focussed on PC than ever before?

Is this starting to become obvious? A start of the end for Macs in high end production? Is that even possible? Could Mac take Samsung on one side, Google on the Other and HP on a processor level and so on?
#2
4th December 2012
Old 4th December 2012
  #2
Gear addict
 
drewwebsteraudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 420

drewwebsteraudio is offline
They aren't focused on just any PC... They are focused on PC Workstations, which are just as expensive as MacPros and are actually fairly common in studios even though you don't really hear about them much...
__________________
www.drewwebsteraudio.com
Quote
1
CJ1973
Thread Starter
#3
4th December 2012
Old 4th December 2012
  #3
Lives for gear
 
CJ1973's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,208

Thread Starter
CJ1973 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewwebsteraudio View Post
They aren't focused on just any PC... They are focused on PC Workstations, which are just as expensive as MacPros and are actually fairly common in studios even though you don't really hear about them much...
Could you please elaborate on this?
#4
4th December 2012
Old 4th December 2012
  #4
Gear nut
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 96

albatrossy is offline
I'm not a Mac user but I thought the introduction of ASIO Guard was a good thing for those Mac users. That aside, Cubase seems to always have been more oriented towards PC users with the development of VST and ASIO. I don't think this was done purposefully, but it seems as if Apple is "less supportive" of Cubase than Logic, and for good reason.

As a result, I have heard complaints of running Cubase on a Mac (and that's not to say one is better than the other!)
#5
5th December 2012
Old 5th December 2012
  #5
Gear addict
 
drewwebsteraudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 420

drewwebsteraudio is offline
I don't know if the ASIO guard will have any effect on a MAC because MACs use Core-Audio drivers instead of ASIO drivers... Unless it also implements protection for Core-Audio as well.

CJ,

The computers that they specifically talked about are HP's work station computers. Work station computers are high efficiency computers that can run fast and smooth for hours on end.

Here are some of the series Steinberg mentioned that are comparable to Apple's Mac Pros: HP Z620 Workstations
#6
5th December 2012
Old 5th December 2012
  #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 586

sodium glow is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by albatrossy View Post
I'm not a Mac user but I thought the introduction of ASIO Guard was a good thing for those Mac users. That aside, Cubase seems to always have been more oriented towards PC users with the development of VST and ASIO. I don't think this was done purposefully, but it seems as if Apple is "less supportive" of Cubase than Logic, and for good reason.

As a result, I have heard complaints of running Cubase on a Mac (and that's not to say one is better than the other!)
ASIO worked fine on Mac OS 8 and 9. Then Apple decided to replace the ASIO spec with Core Audio on OS X.
#7
5th December 2012
Old 5th December 2012
  #7
Lives for gear
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 6,114

Send a message via Skype™ to UnderTow
UnderTow is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewwebsteraudio View Post
I don't know if the ASIO guard will have any effect on a MAC because MACs use Core-Audio drivers instead of ASIO drivers... Unless it also implements protection for Core-Audio as well.
Actually Steinberg mention that especially Macs will benefit from ASIO Guard due to how underperformant OSX is for (near) realtime operations like audio. (This isn't a Cubase issue, all cross platform DAWs perform significantly worse under OSX at lower latencies. It just isn't a very good OS for audio). If anything, it seems that this whole feature was born from the fact that Steinberg don't want to abandon Macs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredo at Steinberg
Especially on the MAC side you will see an increase of performance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helge at Steinberg
It is because OS X is lacking in terms of realtime audio performance due to a lets say different threading model. That's the reason why PCs are performing much better with lower latencies. However, the result is that ASIO Guard improves the performance under OS X heavily.
These quotes come from this thread: https://www.steinberg.net/forum/view...?f=175&t=28267

Alistair
__________________
Alistair Johnston - TV & Film Post, Mastering, Sound Design
--
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool" -- Richard P. Feynman

"There's a sucker born every minute" -- P.T. Barnum
#8
5th December 2012
Old 5th December 2012
  #8
Gear addict
 
drewwebsteraudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 420

drewwebsteraudio is offline
Personal experience recording on several PCs and MACs tell me the exact opposite of what you're saying.
Quote
1
#9
5th December 2012
Old 5th December 2012
  #9
Gear interested
 
ilter's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw & Istanbul
Posts: 10

ilter is offline
I haven't noticed any performance differences on similarly specced computers.

But Pro Tools performs worse than say, Nuendo; when it comes to track counts, available cpu power for VSTi/VI and plug-in processing - doesn't matter which OS one uses.

And guys, that thing is "Mac"... not "MAC".
__________________
Music Producer & Mixer
AVID Certified Instructor & Steinberg Certified Trainer
MMA Studios on Facebook
http://ilterkalkanci.net
#10
5th December 2012
Old 5th December 2012
  #10
Gear addict
 
drewwebsteraudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 420

drewwebsteraudio is offline
Unless we're talking about Pro Tools HD... Which will outrun anything, and also force you to sell your car, house, body, etc... Haha
#11
5th December 2012
Old 5th December 2012
  #11
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: london uk
Posts: 131

filtafreq is offline
Re: Bulletproof ASIO-Guard - Is this what I've been waiting for?

by Helge Vogt ยป 05 Dec 2012 19:49



stealth wrote:LOL I think you could actually make a better argument that Steinberg doesn't like PCs! They pretty much exclusively use Macs for the C7 demo videos, and presentations at shows like NAMM, etc... its pretty rare you see anything official from Steinberg on a PC.


That's true, since about 4 years we use Macs for everything official to actively demonstrate that we care for the platform.
#12
11th April 2013
Old 11th April 2013
  #12
Gear interested
 
ilter's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw & Istanbul
Posts: 10

ilter is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewwebsteraudio View Post
Unless we're talking about Pro Tools HD... Which will outrun anything, and also force you to sell your car, house, body, etc... Haha
Including PT HD. I have an Accel 2 x HD with PT10, and any current DAW beats it just with the host/native processing.
They say PT11 will resolve the issue.
Quote
1
#13
15th April 2013
Old 15th April 2013
  #13
Lives for gear
 
wakestyle's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,454

wakestyle is online now
I think they should actually drop Mac support to focus even more on windows.
Quote
1
#14
17th April 2013
Old 17th April 2013
  #14
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 164

kalle789 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakestyle View Post
I think they should actually drop Mac support to focus even more on windows.
They should drop ASIO and make a new audio engine.
#15
17th April 2013
Old 17th April 2013
  #15
Lives for gear
 
wakestyle's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,454

wakestyle is online now
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalle789 View Post
They should drop ASIO and make a new audio engine.
What is wrong with ASIO?
#16
18th April 2013
Old 18th April 2013
  #16
Lives for gear
 
norbury brook's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,639

norbury brook is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakestyle View Post
What is wrong with ASIO?
Absolutely nothing.


MC
#17
18th April 2013
Old 18th April 2013
  #17
Lives for gear
 
Animus's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Durham, NC USA
Posts: 9,313

Send a message via AIM to Animus
Animus is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by norbury brook View Post
Absolutely nothing.


MC

Well they could design it better to work across cpu cores more evenly. There's nothing more frustrating than to be at 70 to 80 percent in the asio cpu meter and to only be reading 20 percent in Task Manager.
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Topic:
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
Autocrat / Music Computers
16
bassnote / Music Computers
11

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.