Cubase 7 - What do you want? - Page 18 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers > Cubase 7 & Nuendo 6

Cubase 7 - What do you want?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd June 2012   #511
Lives for gear
 
popmann's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,308

Also, this is being picky, but if you're gonna give me an import dialog (and Cubase does) -make one of the options to import them to timestamp. I mean..."origin"...while we're at it...call it timestamp so everyone is clear. Logic is bad about that, too. Their whole implementing the day offset utterly confuses some people I send tracks to..."when I import your files, they disappear"...you know-cause they're a day later in the time line...

Also, to save export size...if I have a 15second guitar solo clip in the middle of the song...and I export the whole song...don't render silence for 4 minutes around it. Sure-make that an option, too, for legacy systems that don't respect time stamping, but even then, only to render from zero-rendering the silence AFTER the solo doesn't even make sense.
popmann is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2012   #512
Lives for gear
 
Sirocco's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,202

Send a message via AIM to Sirocco
How about an import panel that's native to the OS and has things like favorite folder locations, preview imported sound with current track fx enabled, etc .
__________________


SonicSpecialists
- Drums created for, and used by, top producers across the globe.
URBAN FIRE 6 OUT NOW!!!
Check our website, and the billboard charts.
Sirocco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2012   #513
Nea
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 33

The only thing i want from cubase is to go away... I Want be buying 7.. Definately getting Pro Tools
Nea is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2012   #514
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: prague, czech rep.
Posts: 300

Send a message via AIM to lukasbrooklyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by popmann View Post
Track export (batch) improvements.

Option for one that prints NO Processing. WTF. There's ONE scenario I want to print mix processing to an individual track for use in some other unit/program...I can come up with ten off the top of my head where you want to export tracks "dry".

Also to improve that if I export a f'n mono channel, it should be mono, capice? Who cares what kind of mix bus I have it assigned to? How is that relative, again, except when the reason you're exporting is that aforementioned ONE scenario...collaboration where you want everything to sound as close as possible in the destination system.

It would be easily implemented in the existing export dialog.

As someone who does a TON of import/export...this is really not implemented well. By the same token--"bounce selection", and this kills me, doesn't create a timestamped Bwav file, even if that's my native format. Making me HAVE to go through the export audio mixdown dialog to get a quick edit back out. Have whatever it creates as "edits" be the native format...and those who know where it puts things could save a lot of export time, too.
for the time being, you can set up a keycommand to toggle-bypass inserts on all channels at once and use it prior to bouncing.
__________________
mastering :: mixing :: production
contact mastering@lukasturza.com
lukasbrooklyn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2012   #515
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: prague, czech rep.
Posts: 300

Send a message via AIM to lukasbrooklyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirocco View Post
How about an import panel that's native to the OS and has things like favorite folder locations, preview imported sound with current track fx enabled, etc .
this is what mediabay does (most of this, anyway).
lukasbrooklyn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2012   #516
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: prague, czech rep.
Posts: 300

Send a message via AIM to lukasbrooklyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by popmann View Post
Also, this is being picky, but if you're gonna give me an import dialog (and Cubase does) -make one of the options to import them to timestamp. I mean..."origin"...while we're at it...call it timestamp so everyone is clear. Logic is bad about that, too. Their whole implementing the day offset utterly confuses some people I send tracks to..."when I import your files, they disappear"...you know-cause they're a day later in the time line...

Also, to save export size...if I have a 15second guitar solo clip in the middle of the song...and I export the whole song...don't render silence for 4 minutes around it. Sure-make that an option, too, for legacy systems that don't respect time stamping, but even then, only to render from zero-rendering the silence AFTER the solo doesn't even make sense.
isn't the OMF format designed to work this way?
lukasbrooklyn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2012   #517
Gear addict
 
scoring4films's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 471

Like others who've posted here, I wish they'd work on improving basic functionality and fix known bugs, rather than piling on bloatware most of us do not need, like 2nd rate soft synths and amp sims.
__________________
Music for Film and Television
www.ftylershaw.com
scoring4films is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2012   #518
Gear nut
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 101

Im a long time cubase user and I find 6.5 almost perfect but Ok here is one thing im not sure im actually doing the right way
Lets say I want to do a vocal take and the singer wants a little reverb on her voice. Ok here we go
I use fireface so she is monitoring the clean signal through the Total mix zero latency.
Now I have to press direct in on the channel I record on
Turn the volume down so she wont her the signal from cubase with latency
press prefader on the send so I can send the verb
Ok ready to go
Now finish take now I have to do undo all these tweaks plus volume and send level to listen back.
I dont know if there is a an easier way but I find this a pain and very disruptive when you want to listen back quickly. Please enlighten me with an easier way if not cubase please make a verb button or something easier...
__________________
www.nikbeat.com
Nikbeat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2012   #519
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: prague, czech rep.
Posts: 300

Send a message via AIM to lukasbrooklyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikbeat View Post
Im a long time cubase user and I find 6.5 almost perfect but Ok here is one thing im not sure im actually doing the right way
Lets say I want to do a vocal take and the singer wants a little reverb on her voice. Ok here we go
I use fireface so she is monitoring the clean signal through the Total mix zero latency.
Now I have to press direct in on the channel I record on
Turn the volume down so she wont her the signal from cubase with latency
press prefader on the send so I can send the verb
Ok ready to go
Now finish take now I have to do undo all these tweaks plus volume and send level to listen back.
I dont know if there is a an easier way but I find this a pain and very disruptive when you want to listen back quickly. Please enlighten me with an easier way if not cubase please make a verb button or something easier...
well you can monitor through cubase instead, but set the audio interface latency to as low as possible so it's not noticeable for the singer. other than that, some interfaces include built-in simple fx for this very purpose.
lukasbrooklyn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2012   #520
Lives for gear
 
DeadPoet's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,328

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikbeat View Post
Im a long time cubase user and I find 6.5 almost perfect but Ok here is one thing im not sure im actually doing the right way
Lets say I want to do a vocal take and the singer wants a little reverb on her voice. Ok here we go
I use fireface so she is monitoring the clean signal through the Total mix zero latency.
Now I have to press direct in on the channel I record on
Turn the volume down so she wont her the signal from cubase with latency
press prefader on the send so I can send the verb
Ok ready to go
Now finish take now I have to do undo all these tweaks plus volume and send level to listen back.
I dont know if there is a an easier way but I find this a pain and very disruptive when you want to listen back quickly. Please enlighten me with an easier way if not cubase please make a verb button or something easier...
When recording overdubs like that I always set up one channel for monitoring
and record to other tracks. That way I can focus on the music instead of having to switch brain sides to do all the steps you described.

(I have a auto-talkback-trick as well involving a spare channel, the Cubase compressor with the sidechain enabled and the smtpe-plugin)


Herwig
__________________
Prunes&Spoons
DeadPoet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2012   #521
Gear nut
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 101

Great I will try setting another channel up for recording. Makes sense. My computer is rather old so monitoring through cubase is not possible as the latency is very high.
Thanks guys
Nikbeat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2012   #522
Lives for gear
 
norbury brook's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,219

this is the main reason I use Steinberg's own MR816 interfaces so i can have reverb (very good reverb at that too) with zero latency independent of the buffer sizes



MC
norbury brook is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2012   #523
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 284

NikBeat I use Fireface too. Just get a cheap used hardware reverb. Then send return with Fireface/totalmix. Works fine. You don't need a high quality reverb for the monitor mix during vocal recording. Just something to give a sense of space instead of the unnatural dry sound.
tombuur is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #524
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: São Paulo
Posts: 125

i want a tempo detection 3x more acurate.
rakkaus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #525
Gear nut
 
ryandfl's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 125

A simple midi cord setup. Write a note and have a drop down of cord types for it.
ryandfl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #526
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,185

VST 4.0 with pattners, pattern lanes and inter-plugin-modulation
MarkyGoldstein is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #527
Lives for gear
 
filipv's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Dolno Sonje, Sopiste, Macedonia
Posts: 974

I want rock-solid MIDI timing when responding to MIDI input. I don't know about sx6, but sx5 is criminal. Useless.
filipv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #528
Lives for gear
 
zephonic's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,043

Quote:
Originally Posted by filipv View Post
I want rock-solid MIDI timing when responding to MIDI input. I don't know about sx6, but sx5 is criminal. Useless.
Cubase has come a long way. I'm not sure what you mean by SX5 but if that's Cubase 5 I think you're exaggerating. It's nowhere near as sloppy as it used to be, and you can get tight results nowadays, but I agree that it never felt as snappy as Logic or Fruity Loops.
__________________


my blog
zephonic is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #529
Lives for gear
 
popmann's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,308

Quote:
Originally Posted by lukasbrooklyn View Post
isn't the OMF format designed to work this way?
OMF has never been solid enough...nor universal enough. I would imagine any "bulk project transfer" format SHOULD...but, end of the day, timestamped WAV works from RADAR to DP to Logic to PT to my Akai hardware to anything...a few old hardware units and early software need the render from zero, but mostly, a timestamped WAV have been too standard for too long.

Plus--don't necessarily want the whole thing exported.

I'll have to look into the key command thing...so...there's a key command that bypasses ALL inserts in the project? I'm not sure how useful that alone would be--that save me a button on the channel...where I'm still going to have to set the trim back to zero...ch fader back to zero...the way they do the export based on buss assignment, pans back to default...Just saying-much easier to just have a checkbox on the export that says effectively that you want to export what's on the TRACK...not the CHANNEL...as they're wholly different things with different purposes.
popmann is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #530
Lives for gear
 
popmann's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,308

Also...WTF is with the MPEX timestretch being the worst thing I've ever used? I don't do MUCH in the way of timestretching...but, this is something else that the Akai DPS24 handled utterly transparently, while Cubase sounds like a f'd up toy. Terrible. Again-not the hugest deal for me, since I almost never have call to stretch...but, c'mon...what a POS. Take the function OUT if it doesn't work, so that I know I need to go into another app (or back out to the Akai) to handle it. Don't put things there that don't work.
popmann is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #531
Gear nut
 
ryandfl's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 125

When do you guys think 7 will come out?
ryandfl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #532
Lives for gear
 
4damind's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1,091
My Recordings/Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryandfl View Post
When do you guys think 7 will come out?
IMO Winter NAMM 2013 (January)
4damind is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2012   #533
Lives for gear
 
muziksculp's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,859

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4damind View Post
IMO Winter NAMM 2013 (January)
Yup !

Most likely.

Looking forward to Cubase 7.

haha... Is anyone at Steinberg reading these Cubase 7 posts here ?
__________________
Muziksculp's Blog
muziksculp is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2012   #534
Gear maniac
 
scottrod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Western Ohio
Posts: 232

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nea View Post
The only thing i want from cubase is to go away... I Want be buying 7.. Definately getting Pro Tools
Nice.
scottrod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2012   #535
Gear addict
 
Yutaka's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 424

Quote:
Originally Posted by popmann View Post
OMF has never been solid enough...nor universal enough. I would imagine any "bulk project transfer" format SHOULD...but, end of the day, timestamped WAV works from RADAR to DP to Logic to PT to my Akai hardware to anything...a few old hardware units and early software need the render from zero, but mostly, a timestamped WAV have been too standard for too long.

Plus--don't necessarily want the whole thing exported.

I'll have to look into the key command thing...so...there's a key command that bypasses ALL inserts in the project? I'm not sure how useful that alone would be--that save me a button on the channel...where I'm still going to have to set the trim back to zero...ch fader back to zero...the way they do the export based on buss assignment, pans back to default...Just saying-much easier to just have a checkbox on the export that says effectively that you want to export what's on the TRACK...not the CHANNEL...as they're wholly different things with different purposes.
I just use the range tool, select all the tracks from bar 1, and "bounce". "Bounce" happens pre-mixer, works like "consolidate" in PT.
Yutaka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2012   #536
Lives for gear
 
zephonic's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,043

Same here, works fine. Except I use locators instead of range tool.

I've never had a problem with OMF.
zephonic is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2012   #537
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: prague, czech rep.
Posts: 300

Send a message via AIM to lukasbrooklyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by popmann View Post
Also...WTF is with the MPEX timestretch being the worst thing I've ever used? I don't do MUCH in the way of timestretching...but, this is something else that the Akai DPS24 handled utterly transparently, while Cubase sounds like a f'd up toy. Terrible. Again-not the hugest deal for me, since I almost never have call to stretch...but, c'mon...what a POS. Take the function OUT if it doesn't work, so that I know I need to go into another app (or back out to the Akai) to handle it. Don't put things there that don't work.
use the new algorithms introduced in c6?
lukasbrooklyn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2012   #538
Lives for gear
 
Mark Kaufman's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,264

I'd like to be able to "delete all automation" in one click, for all tracks. Sometimes you just wanna clear the decks and start all over again, immediately.
__________________
_________________________________

You can hear my songs HERE.
Mark Kaufman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2012   #539
Moderator
 
Grahamdwc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,090

Quote:
Originally Posted by popmann View Post
Also...WTF is with the MPEX timestretch being the worst thing I've ever used? I don't do MUCH in the way of timestretching...but, this is something else that the Akai DPS24 handled utterly transparently, while Cubase sounds like a f'd up toy. Terrible. Again-not the hugest deal for me, since I almost never have call to stretch...but, c'mon...what a POS. Take the function OUT if it doesn't work, so that I know I need to go into another app (or back out to the Akai) to handle it. Don't put things there that don't work.
Cubase 6 Preview - Time Stretching
Grahamdwc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2012   #540
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 216

Hardware "plugin insert" that works. It would make my life so much easier!
SveinKB is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Logic 9.1 What do you want? topperf Music Computers 9 23rd July 2009 08:56 PM
Logic 8.1 - What Do You Want loncali Music Computers 1451 23rd July 2009 08:30 PM
Pro Tools 8 - What do you want? JustinAiken Music Computers 55 2nd October 2008 01:04 AM
what do you want? what do i need? cute_girl The Moan Zone 15 8th February 2008 08:33 PM
what do you want? alphajerk Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) 10 18th September 2002 12:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.