![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| The Distressor's "daddy" Joined: May 2003 Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 461
Thread Starter | Mixing/Automation Question
1) When doing major mixdowns and you are using a large format analog console, do you ever still use some automation within your digital editor (Protools etc)? If so, what would you automate within Protools etc, and what would you automate on the analog console, and why? 2) Do you ever "double" automate key tracks like vocals, once before compression and once after compression? Could you possibly give a recent example of doing this on a specific track, and why? 3) Have you mixed a major album completely within the box? How do you feel about the ergonomics (physically dealing with the mouse or controller), and final sound quality of doing this? THANKS!
__________________ Dave Derr |
| |
| | #2 | |
| Guest Moderator Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13
| Quote:
I'm loving my Lil Freq...thanks for building it. I'll take a crack at answering.... 1. When on a large format analogue console I do use some automation within Pro Tools, Nuendo, etc. It's pretty easy to automate effects, EQ changes, sometimes mutes to tweak the arrangement, etc. 2. No, I don't usually automate before and/or after compression. Now, I may automate the threshold of a compresser if I feel it's hitting to hard in certain sections...but usually, if I have the compresser set up right, it stays and I just write vocal fader moves, for example. 3. I have mixed major albums in the box. With a mouse, and it's a pain in the ass, as you can only do 1 thing at a time. With a controller, it's certainly easier. I don't like the final sound quality in the box, yet...although it's getting better...that's why I will usually use a better, more phase coherent stereo combining network. Basicall, I have been happy with the sound, but of course if the client is happy I am usually happy. best, ed | |
| |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 36
|
Hey Uncle Freddie, Russell Broom here, long time no speak! As far as using a "more phase coherent stereo combining network", are you referring to some form of analog summing box other than a console? Wondering what you have tried, and what has worked and not worked for you. oh yeah, and how is the new dog working out? (I guess its been about 3 years now, sheeeesh, how time flies!) |
| |
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| analogue mixing without automation | DirkB | High end | 13 | 26th May 2006 03:13 PM |
| Mixing Question | Doggy | Geekslutz forum | 0 | 13th October 2005 10:16 PM |
| Board Automation vs. DAW Automation | jb_studio | High end | 8 | 9th May 2005 11:21 PM |
| Anyone mixing WITHOUT automation? | Jay Kahrs | High end | 46 | 10th September 2003 06:39 PM |
| |