![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 349
Thread Starter | To George.... Converters on your ICON...
Hey George Which converters did you end up using on your ICON? Rail |
| |
| | #2 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 92
| Quote:
most often i use the ones in the 192 I/O; they sound fine, and hold up very well in A-B-C-HR listening tests. up until last year i thought dB Tech was hopeful as a company and as a technology, but i feel far less so today. at the surround conference in Los Angeles last year Dan's wife has made it her life to personally take me down (because i've stated in public that there may be something important to be learned about high-resolution converters with sample rates beyond 96k). generally i record 96k. GM | |
| |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2002 Location: Ans (Liege) Belgium
Posts: 3,286
| Quote:
96 as much as possible here too. Curious though about how you 'perceive' working in 96k. I find the most benefit you get out of it is during the mixing stage. I mean ... yes ... tracking and the conversion done at that point IS an important stage but imvho rather inferior to having a great source to capture in the first place. I'd rather capture a fantastic source @ 44/16 then a shitty source @ 96/24. So what I do , even with stuff I don't track myself that comes in ... I convert everything to 96/24 .... Is it the plugins that sound better , the DA's that sound better , the mixer engine that sounds better @ 96 .... probably a conbination .... I find it easier to be pleased with what I try to do.
__________________ Chris Lambrechts | |
| |
| | #4 |
| Gear Head Joined: Nov 2005 Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 43
| Hi George,
> use the ones in the 192 I/O; they sound fine,< So are there any special items you're using for the system? Extermal clock, special analog cabling etc? I know you prefer analog processing whenever you can, but you must have some favorite "go to" plugins on the Pro Tools platform. Care to share? BTW, I saw the picture of your new room. Really fantastic, I'd love to hear it. But what about the floor? It's just FLAT. What's up with that?;-) |
| |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
Bless you George (from an owner of a bunch of 192 I/O's) Looking forward to your response to Chris' question. Also Chris, interesting thing you are doing bumping stuff up to 96. I'll try that soon. |
| |
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| presonus digi-max lt converters vs alesis hd24 converters | Snatchman | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 22nd June 2008 07:17 PM |
| George Massenburg choses Digidesign Icon for new studio! | Jules | High end | 209 | 28th March 2008 09:57 PM |
| whats the difference between a analog tape deck converters Vs DAC and ADC converters | Surfman | So much gear, so little time! | 8 | 6th September 2006 05:16 PM |
| MESSAGE FOR GEORGE | rtprods | Chuck Ainlay, Ed Cherney, Frank Filipetti, George Massenburg, Elliot Scheiner, Al Schmitt | 1 | 18th November 2005 04:29 PM |
| George Augspurger ? | ToddF | Geekslutz forum | 2 | 24th November 2004 02:17 AM |
| |