Is the old recording industry model dead? What are the repercussions on your work? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Chuck Ainlay, Ed Cherney, Frank Filipetti, George Massenburg, Elliot Scheiner, Al Schmitt

Is the old recording industry model dead? What are the repercussions on your work?
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th November 2005   #1
Lives for gear
 
The Alamo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Brussels, BE
Posts: 582

Thread Starter
Is the old recording industry model dead? What are the repercussions on your work?

Hello to all 6 sound musketteers,

I am interested in your POV on the more recent twists and turns the recording business is going through, the power shifts, management companies, the future...
In the last couple of years I've started seeing a lot of movement in the recording business: financial power shifting from major record labels to independent managers, management companies becoming the new record labels, record companies turning into distribution houses. Management companies becoming the new bean counters, not only working with artist's recording budgets, but being involved in the revenues from tours as well.
Anyway, are you also under the impression that the old recording business model as we know it, is dead, or at least, a bit hypoxic? Are you also dealing more with management companies today? And maybe most importantly, does this influence your way of work, your methodology, your approach towards newer technologies?

Thanks a lot,

RR
The Alamo is offline  
Old 6th November 2005   #2
Gear interested
 
Chuck Ainlay's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 22

META-Chuck Ainlay

It's obvious that the record biz model is in deep trouble and not likely to budge since everyone is so afraid of loosing their jobs if they step out of the mold. Although things here in Nashville seem more stable and the studio business is healthier than the previous few years I don't see it ever going back to the flood of rotating cowboy hat artists of the past. I am seeing more and more indie or self financed projects, of integrity coming through the doors but I wonder how they can ever build a mass marketing campain to compete with the majors. As for the management companys becoming the new gate keepers, I'm not so sure there wouldn't be a conflict of interest here.

Technology has certainly enabled fairly high quality recordings to be done on a lower budget and I totally endorse alternative means to the end but I'm afraid that much is being sacrificed from documentation and archiving to ligitimate engineering practices in many of these recordings. I'm in an enviable situation where I have a full on studio and staff as well as a more buget minded room where I can accomidate anyones budget but I worry how the well established practices and techniques will get passed down to the individuals working on their own in home stuidos.
Chuck Ainlay is offline  
Old 6th November 2005   #3
gml
Gear nut
 
gml's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 92

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Alamo
Hello to all 6 sound musketteers,

I am interested in your POV on the more recent twists and turns the recording business is going through, the power shifts, management companies, the future...
In the last couple of years I've started seeing a lot of movement in the recording business: financial power shifting from major record labels to independent managers, management companies becoming the new record labels, record companies turning into distribution houses. Management companies becoming the new bean counters, not only working with artist's recording budgets, but being involved in the revenues from tours as well.
Anyway, are you also under the impression that the old recording business model as we know it, is dead, or at least, a bit hypoxic? Are you also dealing more with management companies today? And maybe most importantly, does this influence your way of work, your methodology, your approach towards newer technologies?

Thanks a lot,

RR
i may not be answering for the group (i'm in Montreal teaching at McGill), but yes, basically i agree. the record companies, per se, are disappearing. yes, the "record business" as a model is dying or dead. and, yes, management companies, who have more revenue streams to derive income from, are picking up the momentum, and growing. and making better choices, too.

at the same time as far as i'm concerned i'm trying to get the same place, musically and artistically...which is continuing to find ways to improve transparency to the artistic intent.

technologies come and go. methodologies are refined. identifying raw human greed and marginalizing it never goes away.

George
gml is offline  
Old 6th November 2005   #4
Gear maniac
 
ghoost's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Phila
Posts: 285

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Ainlay
I am seeing more and more indie or self financed projects, of integrity coming through the doors but I wonder how they can ever build a mass marketing campain to compete with the majors. As for the management companys becoming the new gate keepers, I'm not so sure there wouldn't be a conflict of interest here.

Chuck,

Do you think that that new artist's (for the most part) are as concerned about competeing with a major (much less being on one) givin the possibilities of sef distribution through whatever means and being able to garner a much bigger piece of the pie through these channels. Assuming they are with a managment co. worth its salt or very industrious and able to rack up sales, say between 10 - 20,0000 somewhere $10 - $15 a pop.

Even though these are not #'s that most of us would consider a stratospherric success, there are certainly enough "new" artists' out there that would consider this a fairly healthy income even after managements cut and moderate production costs.

In other words ... Do you come across this train of thought much

Thank you
__________________
Kyle Ober
-------------------------------------------------------
If You Can't Hear It ... Don't Go Near It ...
ghoost is offline  
Old 7th November 2005   #5
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,312

Quote:
Originally Posted by gml
i may not be answering for the group (i'm in Montreal teaching at McGill), but yes, basically i agree. the record companies, per se, are disappearing.
And I'm gonna be there!





Well...next year...at least I cleaned the studio for him and had the chance to say hi!

Pupo
__________________
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline  
Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's your favourite way of recording Fender Rhodes (Stage Model)? Magnus So much gear, so little time! 32 16th February 2011 03:05 AM
Dead industry with no entry points? Tibbon The Moan Zone 34 5th May 2006 03:06 PM
OT: Recording Industry Contracts spherop So much gear, so little time! 4 20th August 2003 07:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:25 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.