Acoustic cloud question - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics > Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc


Acoustic cloud question

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th November 2006   #1
Gear maniac
 
Chaotic's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 246

Thread Starter
Acoustic cloud question

I dont have a lot of room to work with. I know its best to hang a cloud from the ceiling rather then attaching it directly. So my question is:

What would be more effective, a 2 inch cloud hanging 4 inches from the ceiling or a 4 inch cloud hanging 2 inches from the ceiling??
Chaotic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
tomdarude's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: germany
Posts: 1,616

4 inch cloud hanging 2 inches from the ceiling...

will help trap some more lows!

cheers tom
__________________
"You'd be surprised that "f*ck it!" can be a profound philosophy."
picksail; 28th August 2008, 08:55 AM


"The best sounding sluttiest gear of all time... is a great song" --Greg Wells



http://www.hi-endgear.com


http://www.audio-import.de
tomdarude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #3
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,993

4 inch cloud with 2 inch gap would be better. But with that said a 2 inch panel with a 2 inch gap should be enough for the cloud.

Glenn
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)

See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #4
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,993

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdarude View Post

will help trap some more lows!

cheers tom
yes you are right it will trap more low end, but don't foul yourself into thinking this will be enough bass trapping. You still need to work on the corner. Which I am sure you know this Tom, but wanted others to know it also.

Glenn
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #5
Gear maniac
 
Scott R. Foster's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Jax - FL
Posts: 169

The latter... gapping enhances low frequency performance, but is no substitue for the guts of beast.

If your room is small [less than 5,000 cubic feet or so - on the order of 20x25x10'] then you will benefit from the use of a broadband cloud - one that works on the LF compenents as well as mids and highs - unless your room contents already provide significant LF absorption and needs only early reflection control [not likely absent a fully absorptive ceiling which obviously aint the case].

If all you need is early reflection control, then you can forget gapping altogether and mount 2" panels as flush as is convenient.
__________________
Scott R. Foster
http://forum.studiotips.com/
http://readyacoustics.com/
Scott R. Foster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
Acoustic Cloud's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: around the corner
Posts: 1,990

I recently made a 4' x 4' x 2 inch mineral wool cloud for my studio. I used 2 1/2 inch wide moulding for the frame, and used black burlap to stretch around it.

Hung it with eye hooks and wire. 2 inch gap from ceiling.

Looks good, the middle of the room is tighter for sure.

I will never build anything like that again. Hung it myself, neighbors were all gone, or else they knew what I needed, and hid! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Buy them folks, it taint worth it!

BTW, after all the stuff was bought, I saved NO money.
__________________
If the Earth wasnt created, where'd all the dirt come from?

Acoustic Cloud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #7
Gear maniac
 
Chaotic's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 246

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acoustic Cloud View Post
I recently made a 4' x 4' x 2 inch mineral wool cloud for my studio. I used 2 1/2 inch wide moulding for the frame, and used black burlap to stretch around it.

Hung it with eye hooks and wire. 2 inch gap from ceiling.

Looks good, the middle of the room is tighter for sure.

I will never build anything like that again. Hung it myself, neighbors were all gone, or else they knew what I needed, and hid! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Buy them folks, it taint worth it!

BTW, after all the stuff was bought, I saved NO money.
Nah, I enjoy building things. Plus I do wind up saving a bunch of money. I pay about $7 for a sheet of 703, maybe $4 for the wood for each frame, another few dollars for the eyehooks, and use only a few dollars worth of fabric for each panel. So I will wind up saving a bunch of money.

Next I want to start building some SCA pre's and whatnot.
Chaotic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #8
Gear maniac
 
Chaotic's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 246

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by myfipie View Post
yes you are right it will trap more low end, but don't foul yourself into thinking this will be enough bass trapping. You still need to work on the corner. Which I am sure you know this Tom, but wanted others to know it also.

Glenn
Bass trapping should be covered. Im putting 703 in all corners, and not just panels caddy-cornered, Im actually cutting each sheet of 703 into triangles and stacking them, so the corners are filled with 703. Also putting absorbers at first reflection points, and more 4" panels across the back wall (behind mix position).
Chaotic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #9
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,993

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaotic View Post
Bass trapping should be covered. Im putting 703 in all corners, and not just panels caddy-cornered, Im actually cutting each sheet of 703 into triangles and stacking them, so the corners are filled with 703. Also putting absorbers at first reflection points, and more 4" panels across the back wall (behind mix position).
Then I would just go with 2" on the ceiling. You really do not have to gap it if the other low end is covered, but I would just to make sure.

Glenn
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
tomdarude's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: germany
Posts: 1,616

oooops.... glenn is right!
thx for pointing out...of course corners still need to be treated, there´s hardly too much basstrapping ever


ps: glenn,
is there a reason for thinner panels besides cost/handling/space etc.??
every surface-part you have, would benefit from a deeper low-cut in absorbtion anyway, right ?
pps: mailed you via the mail-form on your site, did you get that mail? was asking about shipping, etc.... cheers tom
tomdarude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
Acoustic Cloud's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: around the corner
Posts: 1,990

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaotic View Post
Nah, I enjoy building things. Plus I do wind up saving a bunch of money. I pay about $7 for a sheet of 703, maybe $4 for the wood for each frame, another few dollars for the eyehooks, and use only a few dollars worth of fabric for each panel. So I will wind up saving a bunch of money.

Next I want to start building some SCA pre's and whatnot.
Maybe,

But is your time worth nothing?

Caint bild dese in tin minnets sun!

FWIW, I am a tool man also..but I would just have it done. YMMV.........
Acoustic Cloud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2006   #12
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,993

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdarude View Post
oooops.... glenn is right!
thx for pointing out...of course corners still need to be treated, there´s hardly too much basstrapping ever


ps: glenn,
is there a reason for thinner panels besides cost/handling/space etc.??
every surface-part you have, would benefit from a deeper low-cut in absorbtion anyway, right ?
pps: mailed you via the mail-form on your site, did you get that mail? was asking about shipping, etc.... cheers tom

Hey Tom,
IMO, No it is always better to use no less then 2" panels.
I have had a couple problems with our quote email. Would you mind emailing me direct at glenn.k@gikacoustics.com? Sorry about that.

Glenn

Glenn
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
tomdarude's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: germany
Posts: 1,616

thx glenn, nevermind...
I´ll mail you again or maybe better give you a call in the next days/weeks...I´m busy renovating the new room.
I think we need to talk

cheers tom
tomdarude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2007   #14
Gear maniac
 
charleslee's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 196

Arrow

hope it's not too late to ask..

how about some pix of your DIY clouds? I need some ideas to treat my place.

Thanks!
__________________
www.tworooms.com
charleslee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
toledo3's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304

Since this is lowend theory, how about big beach umbrellas? Seriously.
toledo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2007   #16
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,993

Quote:
Originally Posted by toledo3 View Post
Since this is lowend theory, how about big beach umbrellas? Seriously.
If you are trying to keep the sun off of you it will work great. If for acoustics then NO. It will not give you the high end absorption you really need.


Glenn
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2007   #17
Lives for gear
 
toledo3's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304

Quote:
Originally Posted by myfipie View Post
If you are trying to keep the sun off of you it will work great. If for acoustics then NO. It will not give you the high end absorption you really need.


Glenn
Okkkkk. Tell that to Tom Dowd. Not trying to get into an argument, ok? It sounds like you haven't actually tried it. Don't diss it until you have tried it. Peace.
__________________
www.vimeo.com/georgetoledo
www.myspace.com/xsongs

"what me worry?"
toledo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2007   #18
Jax
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 4,779

Just wanted to point out a gripe I have with my readyacoustics panels, in case anyone is about to buy some:

The straps on the back of either their 2" or 4" panels cause the panels to hang at @ 4" from the ceiling. I would have really liked it to be 2" so I don't have to build frames for them, and hang from the frames instead. Half the reason I bought the panels and panel bags was to avoid having to build frames for them. I might as well have made them all myself....
Jax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2007   #19
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,993

Quote:
Originally Posted by toledo3 View Post
Okkkkk. Tell that to Tom Dowd. Not trying to get into an argument, ok? It sounds like you haven't actually tried it. Don't diss it until you have tried it. Peace.
No way man, ITS ON NOW!!!!!!!! he he he
Thats cool, if you think it could work then maybe you are right. I have never tried it, but I would think you would get some strange reflections off it
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2007   #20
Lives for gear
 
Acoustic Cloud's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: around the corner
Posts: 1,990

Basic science says that wont work, I dont care what Tom says.

Peace
Acoustic Cloud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2007   #21
Lives for gear
 
toledo3's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304

Quote:
Originally Posted by myfipie View Post
No way man, ITS ON NOW!!!!!!!! he he he
Thats cool, if you think it could work then maybe you are right. I have never tried it, but I would think you would get some strange reflections off it

eh, yeah that seemed totally defensive on my part! You know, it is more of one of those guerilla recording techniques. It is just a sound, rather than some ideal acoustic treatment.
toledo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low ceiling / Acoustic Question dreamaudio Studio building / acoustics 96 11th September 2011 05:41 PM
Acoustic Design Question arpodthegreat Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 7 13th April 2006 05:17 PM
Question re Two Mics on An Acoustic.. oceantracks High end 11 7th February 2006 03:03 PM
(minimal melodic tech) the cloud painter RobAcid Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 2 22nd October 2005 08:09 PM
Acoustic guitar and Vocal Question gabler High end 9 29th August 2003 02:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.