Broadband Absorber Question - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics > Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc

Broadband Absorber Question
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th March 2012   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
Question Broadband Absorber Question

Hello all,

I'm in the midst of constructing my diy bass traps (superchunks,) and my absorbers for my reflection points.

This is the material I am using (the 3", 2.5 pound per square foot variety,):
http://www.thermafiber.com/Portals/0...ta%20sheet.pdf

For the bass traps I'm doing the 17x17x24 superchunks from floor to ceiling in 3 corners of my room (4th corner is not possible, as it's a doorway with no space on the sides.) My question is regarding the absorbers for the reflection points. Based on this material and it's acoustic performance, would I be better to double up and use 6" total in the absorbers on the reflection points? The room dimensions are roughly 9'10"x11'11.5"x8', hardwood floors and bare drywall now. (See this thread I posted previously for a sketch-up of the room: Acoustic Treatment Input Needed

Thanks in advance for the input!

-Ben
bfrance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 8,662

Thick

If you can find the Gas Flow Resistivity of the product you could predict the absorption spectrum using this calculator.
Porous Absorber Calculator

I haven't seen great performance from the 24 inch SSC's, while the 34 inch ones rock.

You will almost certainly be sitting the Height and Width nulls, so it would be well worth trying for some LF absorption at your Cloud and Sides.
6" plus an airgap would be good.

DD
DanDan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2012   #3
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan View Post
If you can find the Gas Flow Resistivity of the product you could predict the absorption spectrum using this calculator.
Porous Absorber Calculator

I haven't seen great performance from the 24 inch SSC's, while the 34 inch ones rock.

You will almost certainly be sitting the Height and Width nulls, so it would be well worth trying for some LF absorption at your Cloud and Sides.
6" plus an airgap would be good.

DD
Thanks for the input. I have a message into Thermafiber's tech support to try to find the GFR numbers for the material.

-Ben
bfrance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2012   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
And so much for that....

The only GFR numbers that they could provide was for 4.0 pcf density Safing Insulation (totally different product.)

Any other ideas on how to calculate this, or do you think that I'd be safe to go with 2 3" pieces deep, for 6" total in material, plus some airspace behind it (thinking of usuing 5/4x8" boards for the absorbers, so that would allow 2" of airspace behind if I didn't space them from the walls at all.)

Thanks again,

-Ben
bfrance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 8,662

OK

Without GFR figures we can only guess. But you could base your guesses on materials of similar density. Common Gas Flow Resistivity numbers.

2.5 pcf is approx 40KG/M^3

I think the stuff you have will be just fine at those thicknesses.

DD
DanDan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2012   #6
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan View Post
Without GFR figures we can only guess. But you could base your guesses on materials of similar density. Common Gas Flow Resistivity numbers.

2.5 pcf is approx 40KG/M^3

I think the stuff you have will be just fine at those thicknesses.

DD
Okay,

Another quick question for you. On my superchunk corner traps, the rockwool wants to lean over and fall once I get above about 8 triangles or so. Would there be any downside to covering the front face of the traps (behind the finish panel,) with 6mil plastic (I have a huge roll of this left over from our gardening)? If not, I think this is going to be the easiest way to keep the traps vertical.

-Ben

Last edited by bfrance; 29th March 2012 at 12:39 AM.. Reason: edited for clarity
bfrance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 8,662

Shelves

Make open shelves, like in this design. Corner Traps finally finished! - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com
These triangular wooden frames also provide a place to screw on the front facing.
DD
DanDan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2012   #8
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan View Post
Make open shelves, like in this design. Corner Traps finally finished! - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com
These triangular wooden frames also provide a place to screw on the front facing.
DD
That's pretty much exactly what I'm doing. I got my inspiration (okay, my copied design,) from this thread: My DIY SuperChunks Plus & Soffit Corner Traps (Pics)

The problem that I"m having is that the Thermafiber RW that I bought is 2.5 pcf, so it's kind of floppy and when I get more than about 5-6 pieces stacked they started to lean/topple out of the corner. I'm thinking of temporarily putting a piece of masking tape in the center of them from the floor "shelf" to the mid "shelf" and from the mid "shelf" to the top "shelf", then stapling 6-mil plastic to the front of the shelves to permanently hold the RW in behind the grills. My only concern is whether the plastic would affect the bass-traping. I'm assuming not....

-Ben
bfrance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2012   #9
Lives for gear
 
kasmira's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,257

Send a message via AIM to kasmira
People recommend plastic a lot here, particularly to not deaden the high end too much. 6mil is right at the suggested cutoff of where it will/won't absorb most mid/high freqs. If you're looking for a truly broadband approach, you may want to use thinner plastic (or none at all) - but if you want them to be mostly bass traps, and not suck up as much treble (which is generally a good thing if you have other absorbers in your room) it will be perfect.
kasmira is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2012   #10
Lives for gear
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 8,662

Shelves

Ben, shelves are the answer. Normally three are enough, but if your stuff is particularly floppy four should do it. Slightly squeeze the fibre in there and it show stay. Otherwise you will have to do some light cross framing. People use plastic, particularly in overhead Clouds. I prefer to use commercial traps for overhead, which contain the fibre without blocking any sound.
DD
DanDan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2012   #11
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan View Post
Ben, shelves are the answer. Normally three are enough, but if your stuff is particularly floppy four should do it. Slightly squeeze the fibre in there and it show stay. Otherwise you will have to do some light cross framing. People use plastic, particularly in overhead Clouds. I prefer to use commercial traps for overhead, which contain the fibre without blocking any sound.
DD
Well, squeezing the rock wool in worked, along with putting 2 sides "frames" of 1x2 boards on them. I still covered them in plastic just to help prevent the possibility of fibers from becoming airborne. Amazingly, just having the two superchunks in the room has made a noticable difference in the overall acoustics.

I'll be making my mirror-point absorbers tomorrow and hopefully getting the "grills" done for all 4 panels. Once that is done and I get a nice rug in the room I'll take measurements and decide if I need more bass trappings.

-Ben
bfrance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2012   #12
Lives for gear
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 8,662

Grill

Nice one. These days I would always included light laths across the front.
About 50% of the area, using Newell's 345 pattern.
IMO looks better than fabric, stops people poking, and has a small HF bounce, with no downsides.
DD
DanDan is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Broadband wall absorbers ... Height question. RJHollins Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 8 18th August 2011 03:43 PM
Quick broadband absorber question Ihsahn1981 Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 4 1st November 2010 11:53 AM
images - DIY broadband panels made of hemp clusterchord So much gear, so little time! 17 18th November 2009 12:52 PM
DIY broadband absorbers questions... _Morph_ Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 12 21st June 2008 02:54 AM
DIY Broadband Absorbers (w/ 703) I play in a ban Low End Theory 8 12th May 2005 09:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:35 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.