![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 140
Thread Starter | Most effective bass trap
I have searched and read a lot on bass traps the last days. Now I have a couple of small questions ![]() I can buy some cheap heat insulation that have 18 kg/m3 density. There is no info on the air flow resistance. Do anyone know what it is likely to be? In my research it seems to me that it is more effective with really thick low density superchunks then typical thinner owens corning 703(for corner bass traps). Is this correct? How thick should I make the traps if the density is 18 kg/m3(posted a pic)? Can I even buy them in the plastic tube and set them up like that or is that much less effective? Space is no issue since I`m moving into a large space soon. Hoping someone can help me with answers. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 77
|
The glass fibre, 18 kg/m³, is probably around 15,3 kPa. http://www.gearslutz.com/board/7293382-post2.html A perforated panel in front, may change the figures of absorbtion a lot. http://www.gearslutz.com/board/7287842-post111.html |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 140
Thread Starter |
Thank you so much! Are there any calculators(I`m on a mac) that you can plot in density, air flow resistance, thickness etc that will show the level of absorption? Sorry for the noob questions but I am fairly new to this. Peace |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,994
| Quote:
__________________ Glenn Kuras GIK Acoustics USA GIK Acoustics Europe 770 986 2789 (USA) +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK) See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2011 Location: In the mitten, US
Posts: 140
| There are two, the whealy porous absorber calculator and the other is a website that I think is in the sticky. Note that these models usually give single-incidence absorption, which is not directly comparable to the usual random-incidence test values you will find for devices and materials per the standard lab test.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear | Random Incidence Porous Absorber Calculator This one does random incidence in addition to any chosen single angle. GFR numbers Common Gas Flow Resistivity numbers. DD |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How I built my bass traps... | Cojo | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 1187 | 4 Days Ago 02:47 AM |
| Most effective bass trap placement high velocity? | Arksun | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 10 | 30th December 2009 11:35 PM |
| About the low end of corner bass traps | Ydope | Low End Theory | 34 | 9th March 2007 10:22 PM |
| Help! Can Bass traps take away too much bass? | Watersound | So much gear, so little time! | 18 | 6th March 2007 02:54 PM |
| what is and is not a bass trap .... | fatgaz | Low End Theory | 64 | 29th December 2006 09:15 AM |
| |