Some reflections are not necessarily problematic ? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics > Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc


Some reflections are not necessarily problematic ?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th May 2011   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 24

Thread Starter
Some reflections are not necessarily problematic ?

Once you find the boundary in question then you can determine if that reflection is problematic and should be treated. Some reflections are not necessarily problematic (e.g. the side walls) ( RealTraps - Room Measuring Series)

It was is the Envelope Time Curve (NM) section of the site http://www.realtraps.com/art_measuring.htm#4

Someone can explain me why The side walls are not necessarily problematic?

I was certain that the big reflection on my ETC graph cause by the side walls need to be treat....
dieselb0y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2011   #2
Lives for gear
 
Gdupproductions's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,261

Quote:
Originally Posted by dieselb0y View Post
Once you find the boundary in question then you can determine if that reflection is problematic and should be treated. Some reflections are not necessarily problematic (e.g. the side walls) ( RealTraps - Room Measuring Series)

It was is the Envelope Time Curve (NM) section of the site http://www.realtraps.com/art_measuring.htm#4

Someone can explain me why The side walls are not necessarily problematic?

I was certain that the big reflection on my ETC graph cause by the side walls need to be treat....
Lol they have to be treated.....i just hung a Cork board back to nail my papers to and now i realy hear no reflections from the right but more from the left wall. However sidewalls need to be treated as sound will reflect from there to your ears wich cause certain frequencys too bust a couple DBs wich will affect your mixing/mastering.
__________________
If it Dont make dollars, it Dont make sense
____________________________________

''Studio Gear''
DAW: Reason 4 / Fl studio / Cubase 4
Monitors: Krk rp6 g2
Audio interface: Tascam us 122L
Guitar: Yamaha pacifica 112
Midi keyboard: M audio 49e

''Computer Rig''
OS: Windows 7 64 bit
CPU: Intel e8400 @ 3.6 ghz
Mobo: Asus p5q pro turbo:
Memory: 4Gb ram
Gdupproductions is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2011   #3
Lives for gear
 
Rod Gervais's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 1,681

Lol, folks everything needs to be taken with the full picture in mind - and then placed in context.......

Ethan notes that all reflections are not necessarily problematic..... including reflections off side walls - this is not the same as saying that no side wall reflections are problematic...

In fact - in his section of the basics of room treatments he states this:

Quote:
AVOID EARLY REFLECTIONS
Another common mixing problem is poor clarity and imaging caused by "early" reflections. Sound from the loudspeakers travels directly to your ears, but a few milliseconds later, reflections arrive after the sound bounces off the side walls and ceiling. This is known colloquially as "time smearing," though the more proper term is comb filtering. Comb filtering is a specific type of frequency response error that creates a series of peaks and dips. The cure for early reflections is absorber panels made of rigid fiberglass or acoustic foam, placed at specific points on the side walls and ceiling. Once these points have been treated, clarity and soundstage magically come to life.
Thus he is obviously pointing out (in the one you mention) that outside of mirrored reflections side wall reflections do not (necessarily) require treatments.....

He is of the belief (as am I) that too dead a room is not a good thing - although there are others whose design philosophies differ on this point.

It is very difficult to read one small section of anything written without misconstruing what's being said in it's entirety.

Rod
Rod Gervais is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2011   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 24

Thread Starter
Thanks all ..... hard for me to read in english sooo ... thats the reason why I need that confirmation ... thanks
dieselb0y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2011   #5
Lives for gear
 
Gdupproductions's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,261

Quote:
Originally Posted by dieselb0y View Post
Thanks all ..... hard for me to read in english sooo ... thats the reason why I need that confirmation ... thanks
Just make pretty thick reflection panels and place em between you and the speaker on the sidewalls. You'll hear your speakers will be more directly sounding to you. Way more direct to you then with out the panels.
Gdupproductions is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2011   #6
Gear interested
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 24

Perceptually speaking, not all reflections have the same effect.

The reflection's angle of incidence plays an important role, is its spectral contents is altered at different angles by the shape of the Pinna.

Whether a reflection is beneficial or problematic has more to do with the coincidence of this and the spectrum of the direct source.

As such, it depends on many other variables, such as the propagation delay time, loudspeaker directivity and programme material.

There are some very general guidelines as to which reflections are in most cases problematic and which are not. For a good review read the relevant chapter in Floyd Toole's book.

Cheers,
Jon
jonessy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2011   #7
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod Gervais View Post
Ethan notes that all reflections are not necessarily problematic..... including reflections off side walls - this is not the same as saying that no side wall reflections are problematic...
Exactly. I'll also point out that I didn't write that specific section of the article. Though that's no excuse and as the editor and co-author I should have clarified.

I just changed that sentence to:

"Some reflections are not necessarily problematic (e.g. side walls away from reflection points)...

--Ethan

________________
The Acoustic Treatment Experts
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2011   #8
Gear nut
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 87

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonessy View Post
For a good review read the relevant chapter in Floyd Toole's book.
That's some really nice reading. Thanks Jon.

.christian
cborg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2011   #9
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,994

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
Exactly. I'll also point out that I didn't write that specific section of the article. Though that's no excuse and as the editor and co-author I should have clarified.

I just changed that sentence to:

"Some reflections are not necessarily problematic (e.g. side walls away from reflection points)...

--Ethan
s[/url][/b]
How about "Some reflections can be more problematic then others (e.g. side walls away from reflection points)...
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)

See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2011   #10
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 24

Thread Starter
thanks all
dieselb0y is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why are some song tempos not even BPMs? imnickb So much gear, so little time! 26 27th October 2010 06:52 PM
Not necessarily against a wall? BatMeckley Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 12 23rd July 2009 12:23 PM
Album but not necessarily shows? vinco Downloads, the future - Q&A forum with expert guests from CD Baby, Tunecore and Nimbit 5 25th November 2007 07:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.