Login / Register
 
Experience with Rockwool other than RW3 ? ?
New Reply
Subscribe
ilovemusic
Thread Starter
#1
21st July 2010
Old 21st July 2010
  #1
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 285

Thread Starter
ilovemusic is offline
Experience with Rockwool other than RW3 ? ?

Hello,

I am in a place where I cannot easily order or obtain RW3 Rockwool.

However, the local builders' merchant is selling 50mm Flexi Rockwool at a good price.

It's this stuff here: http://guide.rockwool.co.uk/media/87...i%20secure.pdf

I need to treat an entire room, mostly the ceiling as it is very small.

Has anyone used this ?

Thank you

Last edited by ilovemusic; 21st July 2010 at 05:18 PM.. Reason: typo
#2
21st July 2010
Old 21st July 2010
  #2
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,824

avare is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovemusic View Post
I am in a place where I cannot easily order or obtain RW3 Rockwool.

However, the local builders' merchant is selling 50mm Flexi Rockwool at a good price.
Have you looked at heating/airconditioning/ventilation/refrigeration suppliers? That is who carries RW3 and similar product. I could find no usefull data to judge the appropriateness of the product you linked.

Andre
__________________
Good studio building is 90% design and 10% construction.
ilovemusic
Thread Starter
#3
23rd July 2010
Old 23rd July 2010
  #3
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 285

Thread Starter
ilovemusic is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by avare View Post
Have you looked at heating/airconditioning/ventilation/refrigeration suppliers? That is who carries RW3 and similar product. I could find no usefull data to judge the appropriateness of the product you linked.

Andre

There is a chart on Page 4 of the linked document, and the data looks very similar to the RW3 absorption specs.

Are these numbers all that matters?
#4
23rd July 2010
Old 23rd July 2010
  #4
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,824

avare is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovemusic View Post
There is a chart on Page 4 of the linked document, and the data looks very similar to the RW3 absorption specs.

Are these numbers all that matters?
I missed that chart. Thanks. The product has minimal low end absorption. Acoustically those are the important things. After that comes price and ease of handling, support issues...

Andre
#5
26th July 2010
Old 26th July 2010
  #5
Gear Guru
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 10,950

DanDan is online now
Rigid

ilovemusic
Thread Starter
#6
27th July 2010
Old 27th July 2010
  #6
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 285

Thread Starter
ilovemusic is offline
Thanks DanDan and Andre !

I found a supplier selling RW5 now..

I would think that should be fine , even if the data differs a bit from RW3 , right ?
ilovemusic
Thread Starter
#7
28th July 2010
Old 28th July 2010
  #7
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 285

Thread Starter
ilovemusic is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovemusic View Post
Thanks DanDan and Andre !

I found a supplier selling RW5 now..

I would think that should be fine , even if the data differs a bit from RW3 , right ?

RW5 anyone ?
#8
28th July 2010
Old 28th July 2010
  #8
Gear Guru
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 10,950

DanDan is online now
RW

From memory, I didn't like RW3, too floppy.
RW5 wasn't available.
It seems to be roughly equivalent to 705.
OK for traps up to say 6 inches. Not good for thicker e.g. Superchunks.
Ideally you would need to see and feel this stuff to determine if it would work in whatever trap design you are planning. e.g. Floppy is not good in a Cloud!

It is such a pain the the best products, e.g. Roxul, and OC are not distributed well.


DD
ilovemusic
Thread Starter
#9
29th July 2010
Old 29th July 2010
  #9
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 285

Thread Starter
ilovemusic is offline
Thank you all so much, especially DanDan, I'll probably have more questions once the material has arrived. I managed to find RS100 / RS60 Rocksilk which I ordered today. RS60 for the entire ceiling/reflection points and RS100/RS60 combination for the corners/basstraps.

Supply of this material is indeed a problem.

Let's face it: Aren't the inspired-by-nature Rockwool / related products an absolutely amazing invention ! I think it's an incredible product !
#10
29th July 2010
Old 29th July 2010
  #10
Gear Guru
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 10,950

DanDan is online now
Great

You are welcome. You might want to consider the 100 for overhead in order to prevent sagging. I haven't seen 60, so feel it out.
Thick traps work better with lower density. If you are doing Corner Straddles 100 is fine, as is 60. However for SuperChunks I would not go 100.
Yes, incredible stuff.
DD
ilovemusic
Thread Starter
#11
29th July 2010
Old 29th July 2010
  #11
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 285

Thread Starter
ilovemusic is offline
Sorry, of course I meant, RS100 10cm overhead all ceiling and RS60 10cm + 5cm straddling the corners..

No time to build Superchunks
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
Mixbuster / Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc
29
ilovemusic / Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc
4
hilander74 / Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc
9
Monobasser / Gearslutz Secondhand Gear Classifieds
0
acdctom92 / Low End Theory
6

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.