![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Mexico city
Posts: 1,177
Thread Starter | depth or area covered?
So, what does absorb low frequencies better? For the same number of acoustic panels, for example roxul rw60: It's better having a trap of 8'' of acoustic material and 2'' gap of 2 feet width x 4 feet high? (less area but deeper) Or having a trap of 4'' of acoustic material and 2'' gap of 2 feet width x 8 feet high? (more area but ) |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,697
|
Your examples are not practical alternatives acoustically. The low end absorption is controlled the most by the depth of the absorber overall. For 4" to 12" deep traps, use 4" RW60, with the balance of the trap being a gap. Andre
__________________ Good studio building is 90% design and 10% construction. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Mexico city
Posts: 1,177
Thread Starter |
mmm Ok So let's say I'm using 4'' of rw60, then making the gap of 4'' instead of 2'' would make a difference? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: May 2008 Location: Delaware
Posts: 305
|
Yes. It has to do with the acoustic energy being greater the farther away from the wall you get (lows). Acoustic energy is at a minimum at a boundary (not good for a panel absorber placed on the wall) while the pressure is at a maximum at a boundary (good for a resonator). PS. There are a lot of good threads on the topic.
__________________ Make it safe to do something unusual cause it might sound amazing. Insanity Recordings - Facebook Profile - Mobile Recording, Mixing, Voice Overs, and Audio Post Production. HTAV PROS - Entertainment Simplified - Custom Home Theater, Audio, Video, and Networking. http://www.htavpros.com |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Mexico city
Posts: 1,177
Thread Starter | Quote:
But isn't acoustic energy the same as pressure? | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Registered User Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,622
|
Velocity is at its greatest at a distance of 1/4 wavelength (note that this position is not constant as it is relative to frequency). Velocity is zero at a boundary surface, but pressure is greatest. Porous absorption works by dissipating particle velocity as heat, and is thus most effective when located in regions of highest velocity.. Resonant absorbers work by dissipating pressure as heat.Thus resonant absorbers function most effectively in regions of highest pressure. ...hope that simplifies the relationships just a bit... |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear addict Joined: May 2008 Location: Delaware
Posts: 305
|
I always forget that the term is velocity. Its in my head it just does not always come out right. Thanks SAC! |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Mexico city
Posts: 1,177
Thread Starter | Quote:
If you say the wave starts when pressure is maximim/minimum, then maximum velocity happens at 1/4 and 3/4. But, what happens when a wave hits a wall and bounces back? Does it reset it's phase? Or does it simply bounce with no phase distortion? | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Registered User Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,622
| Generally speaking, in a bounded space: The velocity of a sound wave is greatest at odd ¼ (pi/2) wavelength multiples. Conversely the pressure is at a minimum at these points. The velocity of a sound wave is at a minimum (0) at the boundary and at even multiples of ½ wavelength (pi). Conversely, the pressure is a maximum at these points. For sound transmitted through a medium that encounters a boundary medium exhibiting a greater acoustical impedance, the wave reflection has no change in phase. If the encountered boundary medium exhibits a lower acoustical impedance than the medium of transmission, the wave is reflected and the phase is reversed. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| So i covered a song what now? | drethe5th | Music Business | 20 | 9th January 2012 03:11 AM |
| R my bases covered ? | Phatsax | Low End Theory | 3 | 7th January 2010 05:19 AM |
| audio driver bit depth vs. recording bit depth | musaee | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 31st December 2009 03:15 AM |
| If the Beatles covered Zeppelin | zboy2854 | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 8th May 2008 02:49 PM |
| I don't know what to say. YES gets covered. | cajonezzz | The Good News Channel | 1 | 23rd July 2006 04:12 PM |
| |