![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 222
| Projection Screen Absorber? OK, so I have a problem, and I was flipping through a stack of acoustics books skimming for ideas. Tell me what you think might be a solution to this problem. I have a projection screen in my home theater, it's a 10' diagonal, and made from white counter top laminate (about 1/16" thick), held in a wood frame, with one brace down the middle. Now, the whole thing resonates at somewhere around 15hz to 20Hz, I've not pinned down the exact frequency, but it's in there. I originally thought to use some 3M 90 strength spray glue and glue some 8pcf Rockwool to the back of the laminate material thinking this would make a giant bass trap and stop the resonating all at once. But after skimming through some acoustics books, they mention that a panel absorber should NOT have the insulation touching the panel, but be separated by at least 1/4" (if I remember correctly). Which then made me realize, if I pile up some 8pcf insulation on the screen, I'm changing the frequency the screen resonates at... So, if I make this projection screen into a panel absorber, would simply mounting the Rockwool to the wall behind the screen (screen floats on a french cleat) work, or would it have to be a sealed environment? The book I skimmed didn't mention anything about panel absorbers needing to be sealed, just had some calculations for figuring out your own panels. Suggestions? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 358
| To work as a panel absorber like every panel absorber I've ever seen, the screen would have to be the front face of a sealed enclosure. Mounting some kind of damping material (substantially more substantial than fiberglass) would lower the resonance frequency because of the added mass, but if you got the mass and the damping factor just right it could totally conteract the screen's natural resonance. I'd be curious to see the results of that excruciating process of trial and error. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Indpls, IN
Posts: 113
| Lonely Raven, First, quite impressive you can identify a resonance at 15-20Hz. It's unlikely that any rigid fiberglass or minerwool will affect this range. Best bet is to damp the material...in this case (and it would be trial and error...don't think you'll find anything in a book to assist): - glue and otherwise properly secure a layer of a 2#/ sq ft, 1/4" Limp Mass Barrier (note, not the more common 1#, 1/8") Look at: Soundproofing Material, Noise Control Curtains, Acoustical Panels, Soundproof Walls, Foam that should damp the material to the point any "ring" is less or non-problematic. WOW...I'm guessing your sub is setting this off??? |
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 222
| Quote:
Quote:
Oh, and it's easy to discern the 15-20hz resonance...it's when the screen starts flapping like a bird about to take off. Not hard at all to see. A 21" sub with 2400 watts driving it tends to excite objects in the house. ![]() You can hear the room rattling in this video. Around 15 Hz is the screen, 30Hz is the dogs kennel, and the whole kitchen excites between 22Hz and 27Hz. YouTube - Maelstrom 21 Opus Dei Excursion Video.MPG | ||
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 358
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 222
| Quote:
And yes, I agree with you completely that trial and error would be fun (assuming it's not you doing the work!), but the results are only as good as the person performing them...and I'm not fully confident in my skills of measurement to want to post them online. Others seem to read things into my measurements that I just don't see. When I can trust and understand my measurements as well as others, then I'd probably enjoy the painful (and often lacking any exciting results) process of attempt and measure, attempt and measure, attempt and measure. Right now I have a 45Hz hump that magically appeared in my sub measurements that I can not explain. If I can't figure out what I did to induce this hump and resolve it myself, then I clearly shouldn't be posting my results online! LOL | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 635
| Quote:
(pointed at by someone here) which recommends glueing the insulation to the panel : Low Frequency Absorbers (go to the bottom of the page). Paul P | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 635
| Quote:
more experience with measurements, but it'll help us a well. The effort we expend in trying to help you gives us experience too. At this point I'm far from confident using REW myself, but watching other people struggle with it is enlightening. Have you tried plugging your values into the membrane absorber formula so see what you could get from a ten foot sealed bass trap with a countertop membrane ? Paul P | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 222
| Quote:
Thanks for the vote of confidence Paul, I will post some results...it's just, I'm really not seeing much if any change with all the work I'm doing. That makes me wonder if I'm barking up the wrong tree, or taking my measurements incorrectly. I'd hate to clutter up my already long winded threat with REW floundering. ![]() I'll get some measurements this week, and maybe the gurus here can help me dial in my home theater. I love sharing what I learn, so I always make sure to pay it forward by helping and teaching others what I learn. Especially if I can prove it with measurements! | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 222
| Quote:
So maybe some of my weird ideas do have merit. I just need to prove it with measurements. ETA: Thanks Paul! | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Cayucos California
Posts: 1,111
| here's some screen fabrics etc AcousticPro1080 Woven Screen Material Screen Research: acoustically transparent screens and then you can just paint it on... Paint on Screen - Projector Screen Paint
__________________ BEACH NOISE entertainment |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 635
| Quote:
to be worthwhile as it seems to leave a few things out. Found in the Master Handbook of Acoustics here (open the box and scroll up a bit). You'd have to figure out the surface density of you membrane by dividing its weight by its surface area. Paul P | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Indpls, IN
Posts: 113
| Lonely Raven, If it's the structureborne aspect of your sub exciting these room features...simply pick up the Auralex GRAMMA to decouple the sub. You'd at least know at that point what is airborne and what is structureborne. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 222
| Quote:
I've thought about trying some insulation as an isolator for the sub, but just haven't gotten around to testing that. Plus, the drawback is that I won't be able to feel it in the seat of my pants like I can now, though I know it could improve the sound a bit. | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: in the dirty south
Posts: 83
| You could DIY something like this: RPG Diffusor Systems - Modex Plate (they even show you how to build it The frauenhofer institute specificaly promote the use of compound baffle absorbers as a screen or chalkboard. source: IBP - Compound Baffle Absorbers Though gearslutz is all about the "broadband bass trapping approach", those are the state of art and do work excepional well even in the lower bass range with being only 4" deep. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 222
| Quote:
It's looking more and more like I have to guess and test. | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Indpls, IN
Posts: 113
| The RPG Modex Plates are fantastic and can truly help a 45Hz issue when placed proper. Back to thge GRAMMA, full discloser...I worked at Auralex. I designed the GRAMMA and I have patent on it...however I have no financial benefit from their sales....all that junk being said...try it. One will support your sub, two would be ideal. I suspect you'll not only clear up the sympathetic vibrations, but enjoy a tighter, punchier bass response. Many dealers have return policies, so it's a simple no risk effort. Back to the tuned absorber topic...be leary of expecting such devices to be miracle workers below 50Hz...it's more likely to create an "after ring" or not address the issue than be successful. They can and do work...I like to use them in conjunction with proper broadband trapping for extra muscle. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 222
| Thanks for your honesty, Jeff, I appreciate that. I still think there is some potential for making my projection screen an absorber. I mean, it's a 10' panel! |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Indpls, IN
Posts: 113
| You're welcome. And, absolutely you should multi-purpose that screen. Seems you have three different issues on the table (15Hz vibration, 45Hz resonance and turning screen into effective absorber). I just finished a high end audiophile room where I designed a "floating" front wall that was tuned to the "Y" first order axial mode in the center and the SBIR behind the speakers (speaker location was determined). It worked very well with the broadband corner trapping. You could certainly do a similar application tuned to specific needs with your screen. All the best! |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 4,052
| Quote:
-R | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,806
| Off topic...sorry. RE: Sub isolation. You may want to look into some appliance isolation feet. I got a set of 4 from Amazon for my HE washer I put on my second floor. Before the feet, (they're simply a dense hockey puck type thing, with an extra layer of far less dense material touching the floor) you could clearly feel the washer during spin cycles. Afterward, the vibration is greatly reduced. I wanna say I paid about $50 for a set of 4 of these. It's my understanding, that for isolation decoupling type devices, that a certain density of material must be used to effectively "shock absorb" whatever weight it is that they are carrying. A 100 lb. subwoofer could likely be compared to the weight of a running washing machine. Then again, I have a Wedgie, and it works really well for bass amps that weigh quite a bit. Ah well, back to the screen thing.
__________________ phantom power doesn't make your voice sound spooky MY BAND http://www.myspace.com/revisiontext OUR STUDIO http://www.gearslutz.com/board/bass-...-progress.html |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| panel absorber | genelec79 | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 3 | 3rd July 2009 10:45 AM |
| Nylon pop screen vs metal pop screen | sugar_ray | Low End Theory | 14 | 3rd April 2007 06:05 AM |
| concert projection? | imloggedin | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 4 | 23rd August 2005 04:12 AM |