Bass Traps for Nasty Mix Position Modes - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics > Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc


Bass Traps for Nasty Mix Position Modes

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd November 2009   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18

Thread Starter
Bass Traps for Nasty Mix Position Modes

There are some great threads here on low end control and I've scoured them all to learn quite a bit. However, I have a specific problem that I'd like to address.

The room size is about 10' wide, 12' deep and 7.5' ceiling. When I run a sine sweep, the main problem area is centered around 120hz. Now, the mix position and the couch at the back of the room (about 18" from the rear wall) are the worst areas, where bass loads the most. When I move into corners and side walls, these seems to be null points, as the bass almost disappears in these areas.

So I'm assuming that the corners are where bass is at it's maximum pressure and least velocity (or other way around, not an acoustic expert obviously).

My question is, would corner 'traps' help this problem that exists in the mix position since it seems energy isn't 'loading' in the corners?

Thanks all!
analogdiesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2009   #2
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
My question is, would corner 'traps' help this problem that exists in the mix position since it seems energy isn't 'loading' in the corners?
Bass traps should always go into he corners. Also you want to hit places like the back wall (behind the couch) as there are nasty nulls and peaks coming from that area.
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)

See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2009   #3
Gear interested
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18

Thread Starter
interesting.

thanks glenn! i'll start in corners and back wall with fairly thick absorption. i'm thinking of putting a facing on these (perforated) so as not to suck out a huge range of mid/high frequencies as well.
analogdiesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2009   #4
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
Originally Posted by analogdiesel View Post
interesting.

thanks glenn! i'll start in corners and back wall with fairly thick absorption. i'm thinking of putting a facing on these (perforated) so as not to suck out a huge range of mid/high frequencies as well.
Yep putting facing on them will work kind of like our GIK 244 and Monster. thumbsup
Let us know how it turns out.
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
Arksun's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Cotswolds, UK
Posts: 1,125

I'm just wondering, would putting less breathable fabric on a basstrap also help to reduce the absorption of higher frequencies, or would that impact its ability to absorb the lower frequencies as well?.
Arksun is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2009   #6
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arksun View Post
I'm just wondering, would putting less breathable fabric on a basstrap also help to reduce the absorption of higher frequencies, or would that impact its ability to absorb the lower frequencies as well?.
You could do it that way also.
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2009   #7
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 118

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Kuras View Post
Bass traps should always go into he corners.
I guess that might bear some qualification. For the best overall impact, I'd agree, but if dealing with a specific problem it may not be the most efficient use of a given amount of treatment. If the problem is primarily due to a particular axial mode (or group of modes) it would be best to concentrate the treatment to cover as much as possible of the surfaces at the ends of that axis - e.g. if the length modes are the main issue, then covering as much as possible of either the back or front walls (or both) should give you greater improvement in that problem area than putting the same amount of treatment in the corners. Broadly speaking the biggest problems are from the axial modes on the longest axis, so there's merit in making treatment of the back or front wall a higher priority than the corners - the more absorbent those surfaces are the faster the modes will decay and the lower their amplitudes. If the particular problems in a room are mainly due to axial modes then treatments in the corners may prove disappointing as the proportion of the area supporting the mode that is dealt with may be quite small.
__________________
REW Author
JohnPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2009   #8
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnPM View Post
I guess that might bear some qualification. For the best overall impact, I'd agree, but if dealing with a specific problem it may not be the most efficient use of a given amount of treatment. If the problem is primarily due to a particular axial mode (or group of modes) it would be best to concentrate the treatment to cover as much as possible of the surfaces at the ends of that axis - e.g. if the length modes are the main issue, then covering as much as possible of either the back or front walls (or both) should give you greater improvement in that problem area than putting the same amount of treatment in the corners. Broadly speaking the biggest problems are from the axial modes on the longest axis, so there's merit in making treatment of the back or front wall a higher priority than the corners - the more absorbent those surfaces are the faster the modes will decay and the lower their amplitudes. If the particular problems in a room are mainly due to axial modes then treatments in the corners may prove disappointing as the proportion of the area supporting the mode that is dealt with may be quite small.
Your right, I was talking more on a starting point. Thanks for CORRECTING ME!!!!!!!!!!
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
lots of bass traps=dulling of the highs...partially reflective traps? Terry McInturff Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 134 9th March 2010 10:44 AM
I like my mix, but the vocals are nasty: how to solve? Please help! Rogervandeberg Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 7 17th July 2008 04:52 AM
Small Control Room Construction: Advice on mix position, bass traps, diffusers, etc. Daedalus77 Studio building / acoustics 5 29th June 2008 04:24 PM
How do i hang My bass traps over the mixing position soulsyn Low End Theory 0 9th May 2007 12:56 PM
timestretch track without nasty bass phaze problems?! JamesTinney Mastering forum 8 26th December 2006 06:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.