Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics > Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd November 2009   #1
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 179

Thread Starter
equipment or more room treatment?

I know that in audio engineering, room acoustics are far more important than equipment. Currently, I record and mix in an approx. 335 sq. ft. room with ideal dimensions, using a modest 8 bass traps situated in close proximity to my mixing position.

My mixes are much better than they used to be. Much more accurate and sound great on all systems. I still have some trouble nailing the low-mids and bass, and I intend to make more bass traps, but my question in this post is:

I have 1 mic currently - the very low budget MXL 67G. Would I be better off investing in room acoustics or first buying some decent alternative mics (from oktavamod for cheap)? I have no other experience with mics but it sure seems the MXL 67G makes my vocals sound like mud.

Your thoughts?
Jakeman1086 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
takman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Greece
Posts: 991

if all you currently have is bass traps..then you need 2" 1st reflection panels to tame highs and mids...bass traps alone arent going to cut it...
takman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
kurt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 708

Proper room first.
kurt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009   #4
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 179

Thread Starter
I use the term bass trap loosely. I really have eight 4'x2'x6" owens corning 703 broadband absorption panels situated around the mixing position (2 in front wall tricorners. 2 on wall in front of me behind speakers, 2 at first reflections, and 2 immediately behind my head).

I also should say that this isn't my final resting spot, or else I would definitely install a wooden floor and a fake ceiling with 2 foot fiberglass all above it. That's not economical at this point, as I could move in a year.

So, my question really boils down to this more specific question:

Which would have more impact on my sound - additional mics, or additional broadband absorption panels, or spending money on cabling so I can situate my computers in the closet (removing a good bit of noise).

Sorry I didn't elaborate fully earlier. Should I still go with more broadband absorption. B/c I have to say, that MXL 67G is MUDDY, and it doesn't seem even eq can get it to properly cut through the mix.

Thanks!
Jakeman1086 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009   #5
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: La Center, WA
Posts: 436

IT's really a matter of opinion. If your room is better than your gear, then it's time to get new gear. If your gear is better than your room, then treat the room.

That's my philosophy. It sounds like you've got a good start on room treatment. If I were you I'd start looking at better mics.

BTW, I'm a huge proponent of room treatment, so my opinion here is not clouded by any gear lust or other disrespect of room treatment.
__________________
Aric Keith
for samples of my work, visit
www.junglenoisestudio.com/samples.html
tenchijin2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2009   #6
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spreewald, near Berlin / Germany
Posts: 316

Send a message via Skype™ to spm_gl
Definitely a difficult question. Being an acoustic addict, I'd still suggest it's time you got yourself a decent mic. Then you'll enjoy further upgrades to your room even more.
__________________
--- Spreemusik ---
Jan Fuchsmann, Audio Engineer
Our new Blog: http://blog.spreemusik.com
spm_gl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2009   #7
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 10,960

Quote:
Originally Posted by tenchijin2 View Post
IT's really a matter of opinion. If your room is better than your gear, then it's time to get new gear. If your gear is better than your room, then treat the room.

That's my philosophy. It sounds like you've got a good start on room treatment. If I were you I'd start looking at better mics.

BTW, I'm a huge proponent of room treatment, so my opinion here is not clouded by any gear lust or other disrespect of room treatment.
+1
If your room is not sounding good then spending money on a better mic will not help as much as you still have to deal with the room.
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)

See the NEW Soffit Bass Trap
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Room placement for drum kit and room treatment? Caesar Studio building / acoustics 6 9th October 2009 12:09 PM
Control room/live room treatment Carrigsound Studio building / acoustics 4 27th February 2009 08:53 PM
How different the Cntl Room from the Live Room treatment ? Maddaroad Studio building / acoustics 11 13th November 2008 09:05 AM
Pic of my room dimensions. Need help with room treatment please! heisleyamor Studio building / acoustics 11 21st April 2008 10:41 PM
Anyone built these for their room?(DIY room treatment) cajonezzz So much gear, so little time! 13 11th March 2003 03:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.