Rockwool for ceiling - which of these would be best? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics > Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc


Rockwool for ceiling - which of these would be best?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd September 2009   #1
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 391

Thread Starter
Rockwool for ceiling - which of these would be best?

I already have 8 great GIK244s, now I'm putting in a false ceiling in both my garage and control room:

1. on page 29 of this brochure (see below) there's some RW3/4/5/6 and other rockwool, any idea how low they'll absorb? I don't want anything toooo heavy for the ceiling! There'll be a considerable air gap above.

2. Should I get RW6 for corner traps? What thickness would absorb down to, say, 50Hz?

http://www.minster-ins.co.uk/downloa...duct_Guide.pdf


Hope someone can advise!! Glenn....?

Thanks,
Oli
Oli_W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,697

How thick are you planing for? The industry standard is the rw3. Famous from all teh BBC use of it in absorbers. You will not have much diference acoustically betwena ny of the materials on that page.

Andre
__________________
Good studio building is 90% design and 10% construction.
avare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2009   #3
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
What thickness would absorb down to, say, 50Hz?
REALLY THICK!! Why 50hz?
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,697

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oli_W View Post
2. Should I get RW6 for corner traps? What thickness would absorb down to, say, 50Hz?
Sorry I missed that, adding specifically to what Glenn wrote, 12" for free field absorption and 24" for normal absorption. That is based on tests published by BBC. Auntie Beeb is great for acosutical data relating to studios.

Andre
avare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2009   #5
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 391

Thread Starter
Wow - 12" is pretty damn thick!

50Hz is how low my dynaudio bm5a's reach and covers most fundamentals and the thump of my rock kicks.

The 244s in corners absorb pretty deep, and they're a lot less than 12" - are they much denser than the RW6 then?

Thanks for all the help :D
Oli_W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #6
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oli_W View Post
Wow - 12" is pretty damn thick!

50Hz is how low my dynaudio bm5a's reach and covers most fundamentals and the thump of my rock kicks.

The 244s in corners absorb pretty deep, and they're a lot less than 12" - are they much denser than the RW6 then?

Thanks for all the help :D
The 244 is less then 12" thick but when you straddle the corner it works much better. It has a base of 8 pound.
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)

See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,697

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Kuras View Post
The 244 is less then 12" thick but when you straddle the corner it works much better. It has a base of 8 pound.
Just adding to this for people to whom it is not clear, straddling a corner with absorbent material is creating a gap. Acousiticaly the same effect as spacing the material away from a hard surface.

Andre
avare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #8
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
Originally Posted by avare View Post
Just adding to this for people to whom it is not clear, straddling a corner with absorbent material is creating a gap. Acousiticaly the same effect as spacing the material away from a hard surface.

Andre
So Andre do you thick that if I was to space a panel in the corner to make a 12" gap (the panel flat in the corner) do you think it would be better or worse then straddling? The reason I ask is our Panel Trap can fold up and straddle the corner to act like a 6' 244 but I guess you could leave it open (making a square corner, if you can imagine that ) so it would create a 12" gap. Bryan and I have gone back and forth on that but decided that straddling was proven so we stick with recommending it that way.

Interesting subject though.
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,697

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Kuras View Post
Bryan and I have gone back and forth on that but decided that straddling was proven so we stick with recommending it that way.
I communicated poorly. I was referring to the straddling of the corner. The effective depth is the height of thr height triangle. Height in the mathematical sense. I am agreeing with straddling for creating the gap.

I hope that cleared things.

Getting confused,
Andre
avare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #10
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 391

Thread Starter
Interesting!

My false ceiling in the garage will have a huge air gap, as the roof is triangular and the roof will be straight across.

The false ceiling in the control room will have about 12" air gap. So I'm hoping it'll act as a reasonable trap even with a fairly low mass of rockwool.

(I've made some diffusers for the garage too, goddamn the skyline one took forever! QRD is definitely the easiest to make...)

Thanks for all the replies - I think I'll go with the RW3, and as much as I can get!
Oli_W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #11
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
Originally Posted by avare View Post
I communicated poorly. I was referring to the straddling of the corner. The effective depth is the height of thr height triangle. Height in the mathematical sense. I am agreeing with straddling for creating the gap.

I hope that cleared things.

Getting confused,
Andre
Ok that clears it up.
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pics: ceiling corner bass trap mount without making ceiling holes.. Nordenstam Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 4 11th July 2011 04:26 PM
2" Rockwool on the ceiling Rossome Studio building / acoustics 9 6th January 2009 02:48 PM
Lo-ceiling in vocal booth. Catch: Can't drill into ceiling TheRealRoach Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 5 26th June 2008 07:54 PM
which ceiling design for a small room with drop ceiling? pilldriver Studio building / acoustics 8 15th April 2008 09:01 PM
3pcf vs. 6pcf rockwool in ceiling mounted absorbers coyotekells Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 1 6th February 2008 12:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.