![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 283
Thread Starter | diffuser primes and frequency range Hi I'm thinking about making DIY diffuser, I just don't know which prime and what type and what frequencies I wanna diffuse.....is there any way to figure out what frequency range I wanna diffuse, so I can figure out the design of the diffuser I am going to make... thanks.... check out my Lego diffuser I just made for fun...it cost only 18dolars, and weigh around 5 kilos....that is very light...!!!!! it's about 1.5feet in length and width Skyline made of Lego blocks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,003
| I would just stick with the standard 7 root QRD. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 283
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear | Well, the lower the frequency to which they diffuse, the deeper the diffusor. How many legos do you have? ![]() Diffusion is most common between about 1k and about 5k. Sometimes lower, sometimes higher, sometimes both.
__________________ The acoustic treatment experts |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 756
| I'd agree with the 7 root. If you can use about 6" thickness, you can effectively cover a range from the mid 500's to around 3.5kHz. Bryan
__________________ I am serious, and don't call me Shirley Bryan Pape Lead Acoustical Designer GIK Acoustics |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Norway
Posts: 1,737
| Why the root seven recommendation? What benefit is there over the 2D diffusors? |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Norway
Posts: 1,737
| Bumpy.. Not to to bite anyone or anything like that, but I do find the recommendations above a bit odd. QRD's are simpler to build for sure, but if the means are there to go with PRD's - why not? The range of scattering both above and below the design frequency is better with PRD's and they need less distance from the listening position. So if practical implementation is a non-issue, I'd wager to say that PRD's are better. Aside from the odd situations where diffusion in one direction and specular reflections in the other direction is desired. *edt: this is AFAIK. I'd love to stand corrected if there's anything wrong in my understanding of this! |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| eu telephone frequency range | ONE LUV | Post Production forum! | 10 | 14th May 2009 01:06 AM |
| Determining 'skyline' diffuser frequency range. | HookedOnHardware | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 12 | 13th May 2009 04:05 PM |
| effect triggered by specific frequency range | mhadean | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 21st October 2008 04:09 PM |
| Frequency range of an analog synth. | jupiter8 | Geekslutz forum | 5 | 11th September 2007 09:44 PM |
| Frequency range of Adam P33A | Infernal_Death | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 5th November 2004 08:25 PM |
| |