Making 10 ft tall portable iso panels. - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics > Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc

Making 10 ft tall portable iso panels.

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th June 2009   #1
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 183

Thread Starter
Making 10 ft tall portable iso panels.

I bought 12 cubicle partitions for $50 at a 2nd hand shop the other day. They are about 5ft tall each. My room is about 12ft tall. What I want to do is stack them in two's, so I have portable panels that reach nearly to the ceiling. With 12 of these, I could easily create 3 iso booths in my room, at any time.

It's going to be a bit precarious, and will require a very large base being installed. But the floor is wood, so I should be able to slide them around easily.

If they were like, 7ft tall, I would leave them as singles. But they just aren't tall enough to do a little vocal booth or anything. But at 10ft they would be amazing.

Has anybody ever used office partitions like this? Any advice or ideas?
Josh Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #2
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,302

Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
I built some 2x6 gobos several years back. They work well, but if I had it to do over again I'd make them 4x4. Don't forget about eye contact.

I'd keep them at 5', and possibly find a piece of recycled glass to attach to the top to make them taller. I'd only do this for one or two panels for the singer, the rest of the panels can be 5' tall no problem.
__________________
The acoustic treatment experts
jwl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #3
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,859

Quote:
and possibly find a piece of recycled glass to attach to the top to make them taller.
Have you ever done it that way? I would think you would get some pretty nasty reflections from the glass.
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)

See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,339

Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Kuras View Post
Have you ever done it that way? I would think you would get some pretty nasty reflections from the glass.
Yep..those type of gobos are meant for a couple of guitar players or something who need to maintain eye contact with each other or the rest of the band. I would *not* stick a vocal mic in front of one.

Frank
__________________
Frank
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #5
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,302

Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
Yeah, you should definitely minimize the amount of glass. If you use it with a vocalist, then you should use a cardioid mic and point the null point of the mic toward the glass.

Using glass at the top layer of a gobo is quite common, you see big studios with units like this all the time, and commercially available units like this:



Using glass is only really important when eye contact is needed between performers. It's not acoustically ideal to have glass that close, but if giving them eye contact results in a better performance, then I'll live with it, and use good engineering techniques to minimize the problems the glass imposes.
jwl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,339

Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Man...I was talking about a little window or something. That's a heck of a lot of glass. I think it'd be better at that point to simply dispose of the glass at the top altogether...the cure is worse than the disease.

Frank
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #7
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,313

Lightbulb

Large glass in a gobo is very common in professional studios, though maybe a little less so in small project studios. See photos below. More to the point, we offer this as an option for customers that want it. As Jim said, if you put the reflecting surface in the mic's null you avoid any problems. Also, our window is made of plexiglass, not glass, so it reflects much less than regular glass.

--Ethan

Abbey Road:


Motown Hitsville:


Random found on web:


Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #8
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,302

Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
Agreed, in a small studio I probably wouldn't use glass gobos. But it can be useful in big live rooms.

And again, it's all about making the artists comfortable. If dealing with a few glass reflections gets me a better performance to record, then I'll do it every time.
jwl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #9
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,859

Needless to say there are options so go with what works best for you. If you don't mind a little comb filtering coming off the singers mic then hey there you go.

or

Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,339

Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Okay...point taken. If you'll notice though, the glass covers much less area in the gobos in the first and second pictures and it's slanted in the gobos in the third picture. I'm used to dealing with the gobos in the second picture. Plus, I'm still not convinced that putting a singer a foot away from a big plexi plate is good move...sure, if you're 5' away on a drum kit like all but one of the pics show it's much less of an issue.

Frank
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 582

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Kuras View Post
Needless to say there are options so go with what works best for you. If you don't mind a little comb filtering coming off the singers mic then hey there you go.

or

Glenn - that picture is pretty much EXACTLY what I'm needing... is that a product you guys offer? The hinged, tall absorbing-gobo-thing?

...and before someone asks, I'm sort of carpentry-deficient... rather have em made than make em myself... my time's worth something, too
badhorsie777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,339

Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Sure is...check it out: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/new-p...ml#post4336911.

Frank
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2009   #13
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,302

Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Kuras View Post
Needless to say there are options so go with what works best for you. If you don't mind a little comb filtering coming off the singers mic then hey there you go.
Well, a good engineer will do whatever it takes to get the best performance. After all, the performance is the most important thing, even for a hardcore acoustics geek.
jwl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2009   #14
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,313

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Kuras View Post
If you don't mind a little comb filtering coming off the singers mic then hey there you go.
Am I the only person who finds this comment pointless and even insulting?
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2009   #15
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,859

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
Am I the only person who finds this comment pointless and even insulting?
Ethan, wow yea reading back on it I guess it IS!!! Which I am sorry. I don't mean that against your product in anyway shape or form. Really your products are great which I have said in the past. I really was not aiming my comment at your products at all.

Guys lets move on. I think we have beaten this horse.

Glenn
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2009   #16
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,859

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwl View Post
Well, a good engineer will do whatever it takes to get the best performance. After all, the performance is the most important thing, even for a hardcore acoustics geek.
Sure
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2009   #17
Lives for gear
 
Berolzheimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: El Lay
Posts: 2,209

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
Large glass in a gobo is very common in professional studios, though maybe a little less so in small project studios. See photos below. More to the point, we offer this as an option for customers that want it. As Jim said, if you put the reflecting surface in the mic's null you avoid any problems. Also, our window is made of plexiglass, not glass, so it reflects much less than regular glass.

--Ethan
Ethan have you ever thought about making those with curved plexiglass? I'd think that a convex curve ( you could use 2 sheets so both sides are convex) would produce much less problematic reflections than a flat sheet of plexi or glass.
__________________
Purveyor of fine sounds since 1961.
My very incomplete IMDB list:

My very incomplete IMDB list

I'm all ears.
Berolzheimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2009   #18
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,302

Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
Making the panel curved is an interesting idea... but honestly I don't think it's much of a problem. We've never gotten one single complaint about reflections coming off the glass top. I've never heard it in a recording, either.

Furthermore, if we made it curved, then one side would be concave and the other convex. The concave (I think that's it, I always get these 2 terms mixed up) side would then have even more reflections, as they would be focused. It would make things even worse.
jwl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2009   #19
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,313

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwl View Post
you should use a cardioid mic and point the null point of the mic toward the glass.
LOL, sorry, I can't help myself. Watch this video of an amazing performance recorded by George Massenburg in his control room. Look at the part around 55 seconds in.

YouTube - Mother's Child - Dawn

And don't forget to click the HD button to see it in high-def.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2009   #20
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,859

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwl View Post
Making the panel curved is an interesting idea... but honestly I don't think it's much of a problem. We've never gotten one single complaint about reflections coming off the glass top. I've never heard it in a recording, either.

Furthermore, if we made it curved, then one side would be concave and the other convex. The concave (I think that's it, I always get these 2 terms mixed up) side would then have even more reflections, as they would be focused. It would make things even worse.
You could always offer 2 different kinds I guess.
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2009   #21
Gear nut
 
kraskland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 90

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
YouTube - Mother's Child - Dawn

And don't forget to click the HD button to see it in high-def.

--Ethan
Nice video. From the photos I've seen of the space I expected it to be much larger. With the band in there it actually looks quite small.
kraskland is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stacking 4' Panels in a 8' Tall Room? NewSc2 Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 7 3rd January 2009 12:26 PM
semi-portable iso booth CK9 Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 17 28th February 2008 05:23 AM
making panels for portable iso booth Ramchandra Low End Theory 5 16th June 2007 03:43 AM
DIY Portable Acoustic Panels mrbowes Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 4th January 2007 08:11 AM
Pictures of my portable G4 iso box P_J Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 9 28th March 2003 07:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.