![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2
Thread Starter | Density vs Depth (corner bass traps)
I just completed a basement room for my younger brother's studio / jam room. The room is 13x17 feet and the acoustics are horrible. I want to build corner bass traps for all four corners (full height of wall) My question is referencing information found on http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm If I am reading this correctly I can build 16" wide corner traps with the paper backing Toward the room to effectively kill the bass but not diminish all the higher frequencies. I would like to not kill all the highs because I also will be hanging 4 ~ 8 acoustical panels on the walls opposite and behind the loudest gear. However, looking over the 700 series insulation (which I can't find or afford) it seems that paper faced out r-19 will absorb very low frequencies but it will not absorb large amounts of them due to the density of only 0.5 pcf. Is that correct? If I used paper out R-19 (6.25 inches) backed with un-faced R-30 (9.25 inches) I would have a total thickness of 15 1/2 inches at roughly 0.5 psf. If I sandwiched that down to 3.5 inches, roughly the size of the 1x4's I'm using, it would have a density of 2 psf. Would that increased Density help with the amount of sound waves that are absorbed? Would increasing the density of the fiberglass AND putting the paper towards the room make the bass trap too dense? I'm really racking my head on the thickness vs density thing! There are so many smart people on the forum... and I know everyone is going to start advising OC 703 and 705. I can get R-19 for free and unfaced R-30 is very reasonably priced. I'm already went over budget building the room! This sandwiched design would allow roughly 1 foot of air space behind the traps.. I know that affects it somehow.. but I'm not sure how. Thank you for the scientific advice. Cheers Andrew |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,992
|
Here is the best way to say it. If the corner trap is filled you can use the low density stuff. If you make panels 4" to 6" then go with the 703,705 or mineral wool 4 pound or higher. Glenn
__________________ Glenn Kuras GIK Acoustics USA GIK Acoustics Europe 770 986 2789 (USA) +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK) See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2
Thread Starter | Quote:
I know you are a well respected and contributing member to this forum. However, I specifically said I do not have the budget to buy 703. Would 15 inches compressed to 3.5 inches work as well or close to as well as 703? That would have a density of 2 pounds. | |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,992
| Quote:
Honestly I read right over you compressing it. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Non corner bass traps | vegafreak | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 12 | 14th January 2009 06:34 PM |
| bass traps and corner priority | RCM - Ronan | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 6 | 20th December 2008 12:09 PM |
| Corner/bass traps | Mixbuster | Studio building / acoustics | 5 | 10th June 2008 12:49 PM |
| Would High Density 'Memory Foam' work for Bass traps? | AgentSanchez | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 10 | 5th June 2008 06:40 PM |
| Corner Bass traps from cupboards | asagaai | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 26th November 2006 12:40 PM |
| |