Ethan and Glenn - Shot my room, whhaddah you think?

[KC Blitz]

I would zoom in more on the vertical axis, more detailed..

[Ethan Winer]

Yes, 30 dB per vertical division is useless and hard to read. Regardless, you need more bass trapping. Sorry if I sound like a broken record.

--Ethan

[analog orange]

Yikes, I posted the wrong one. I'll get the right one up tonight. Thanks in advance.

[Glenn Kuras]

Originally Posted by Ethan Winer

Yes, 30 dB per vertical division is useless and hard to read. Regardless, you need more bass trapping. Sorry if I sound like a broken record.

--Ethan

word

[analog orange]

Okay, fixed the resolution of the graph(s) and attached a couple of pics of the space. Please excuse the mess. Any an all opinions appreciated.

Thanks.

[Glenn Kuras]

What do you all recommend? I was thinking a bunch of high freq absorption for all that crap 1k and up and then a bunch of superchunking. I was thinking I might be able to get away with a bunch of 1" 703 everywhere for the 1k and up stuff. For the rest I was thinking superchunks in all the corners and a bass trap on all the points where wall meets ceiling or floor. I'm going to need to be able to track vocals in the room, both singing and voiceovers.

Sounds like a good plan to me, but instead of 1" go with 2" and space it off the wall 2". That will help in the lower mids/upper bass also.

Glenn

[Weasel9992]

Originally Posted by analog orange

I was thinking a bunch of high freq absorption for all that crap 1k and up and then a bunch of superchunking. I was thinking I might be able to get away with a bunch of 1" 703 everywhere for the 1k and up stuff. For the rest I was thinking superchunks in all the corners and a bass trap on all the points where wall meets ceiling or floor. I'm going to need to be able to track vocals in the room, both singing and voiceovers.

What are you doing on the back wall?

Frank