![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Banned Joined: Oct 2007 Location: europe
Posts: 1,548
Thread Starter | Fluffy or rigid fiberglass
Hi I am finishing my studio now and have few questions about absorb material for you : I covered the ceiling with 3" fluffy fiberglass and then covered it with fabric and i also built 12 bass traps in the corners and filled the traps with 6" fluffy fiberglass . Is this fluffy fiberglass ok for insulation of the bass traps and the ceiling or is it much better to use rigid fiberglass for the traps ? I am really confused about difference between this materials : -fluffy fiberglass -Rigid fiberglass -Rock wool -Mineral wool -703 -705 Can somebody explain the difference and maybe post some pic of this materials ? It would make our lives much easier . Is there a rule about relationship between all these materials like 4" of rigid will absorb same frq. as 8" fluffy fiberglass or same as 16" of mineral wool etc .... Thanks for your help |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005 Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 764
|
Fluffy can be used as a good substitute when you have lots of thickness. For 3", it's borderline down in the deep bass. Will do OK to 125hz or so though. Are you sure you want to do your whole ceiling like that? Is it a dual use room? Bryan
__________________ I am serious, and don't call me Shirley Bryan Pape Lead Acoustical Designer GIK Acoustics |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 859
| http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm Go to this site for data on absorption. Fluffy won't look bad if you upholster it well, you just have to use at least 10in of the stuff to equal the effectiveness of 4in 703 or mineral wool. Compressed fiberglass is exactly what it's name implies. Use fluff if you're on a budget, or other options if you can allow more spendage. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
703 and 705 are rigid fiberglass products made by owens corning. 705 is about twice as dense as 703. Fluffy fiberglass is nowhere near as dense as rigid; imagine 12" of fluffy compressed to 1", and you have rigid fiberglass. Rockwool and mineral wool are the same thing; it's a different material than fiberglass but has (approximately) the same absorption specs for similar densities. It's not quite as rigid, ie, it doesn't hold its shape as well.
__________________ The acoustic treatment experts | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
Either 703/705 or mineral wool will work great for fabricating treatment given similar densities. If you work with mineral wool you'll see that it's easy to work with and holds it's shape just fine. 703/705 work well too, but they're a bit more expensive...the absorbtion coefficients are almost exactly the same. Frank
__________________ Frank |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Banned Joined: Oct 2007 Location: europe
Posts: 1,548
Thread Starter |
So there are 3 different absorb materials : -Rigid fiberglass -Fluffy fiberglass -Mineral wool Right? If so , i am not sure if i have Fluffy fiberglass or Mineral wool ! What is the difference , could you guys post some photos ? This is what i have (see the pic) |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Banned Joined: Oct 2007 Location: europe
Posts: 1,548
Thread Starter |
one more
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995
|
That would be fluffy fiberglass I believe. edit. Just did a search and I guess that stuff is mineral wool based. Either way though it will work if thick enough. Glenn
__________________ Glenn Kuras GIK Acoustics USA GIK Acoustics Europe 770 986 2789 (USA) +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK) See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap Last edited by Glenn Kuras; 24th June 2008 at 04:43 PM.. Reason: I WAS WRONG! |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Banned Joined: Oct 2007 Location: europe
Posts: 1,548
Thread Starter | Quote:
Thanks Glenn in advance | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008 Location: South, US
Posts: 117
| Quote:
Hey I've been researching for a while and plan to build my own traps as well. Locally, I can easily find the fluffy stuff (R19) plus it's cheaper. Anyway according to bob golds coefficient chart, there is a small difference between the 703 4" rigid and the R19 6.25" when hung on the wall, but not enough to justify the cost difference, imo. Basically, very close absorption. search the forums for the chart to compare...hope this helps | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 859
|
The link is in this thread! But you might want to go thicker than r19, most likely r30. Look around and call. A friend of mine just got two MASSIVE packs of mineral wool for about 100 bucks.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008 Location: South, US
Posts: 117
| Yep, over looked it! I saw r-30 at the big box stores yesterday, as well. I haven't seen the absorption rate anywhere on the R-30, though I know it is better...any ideas where to this info?
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 859
|
Most r30 is between 10 and 12inches thick, so I'd imagine it's comparable to the 12in. un-faced data on the Bobgold's site.
|
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008 Location: South, US
Posts: 117
| Quote:
True...didn't think of it like that... Once I saw the R-30 was available, I questioned if the price difference would yield a worthwhile difference....Now I have something else to ponder. Thx! EDIT: One more question for those who have worked with the fluffy stuff. How much does this stuff compress? Say I have some 6.25" R-19 and want to put it in 6" frames is that done easily? Does it compress more easily than that--what would be optimum width of frame using this material? Just trying to get a 'grip' on how it handles before I start buying materials(poor folks gotta budget like crazy!) | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 859
|
I feel ya man for the budget. Food is sometimes more important than music. I did two rooms (a total of 20 panels) for less than $250. I squeezed the 10in r30 into 4inch frames. It compresses ALOT. You have to really pull your upholstery tight in order to get it as flat as possible. There will be a bulge, but it'll only be about 6in total thickness at the center, which still looks pretty good. Now to finish my Wal-Mart crayola foamboard & Elmer's school glue QRD diffuser!! (the sad thing is that I'm actually building one right now, just waiting for the glue to dry...) |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008 Location: South, US
Posts: 117
| Quote:
Cool...exactly what I needed to know...and yes that is a lot of compression! good price too--This will work out nicely... | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rigid Fiberglass in SoCal? | aclarson | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 4 | 13th May 2008 06:41 PM |
| Is This Rigid Fiberglass okay? | ryanformato | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 1 | 25th March 2008 04:17 PM |
| Bass Traps w/Rigid Fiberglass | Doublehelix | So much gear, so little time! | 11 | 4th December 2006 02:41 AM |
| Rigid fiberglass ala Ethan... | AlexLakis | So much gear, so little time! | 21 | 29th November 2005 09:30 PM |
| |