![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 417
Thread Starter | Density about fiberglass panels
Hello, I started the thread "Building some bass traps, check 'em out ", but since this is an specific question, I must create a new thread . Hopefully Ethan or Glenn could help me out here. My problem is the following: I bought low density fiberglass panels, without knowing they were 18kg/m3 (like 1.4 pcf) I already put those panels inside 3 frames (out of six) but even tho, i'm gonna make a few calls asking if i can find more denser panels here in Chile, i dont mind taking them out if they totally wont work. Now.. I was seeing some absorption charts, and the diference from 18kg/m3 to 60kg/m3 is not that radical, it only improvees a few . The numbers only raise up a lot from panels of 90-100kg/m3 and above So.. Can I still use them? Or I better buy the denser panels i can find here? Obviosly i know the answer. The denser the better. BUT, Can I still use the 3 panels i already made for the sidewalls and get thicker fiberglass for bass trapping? (So i dont completely lose the money i put on the fiberglass panels i bought) THanks PD: The panels i bought are 2" thick 18kg/m3. So the idea is to buy 2" thick as well , but denser |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995
| Quote:
Glenn
__________________ Glenn Kuras GIK Acoustics USA GIK Acoustics Europe 770 986 2789 (USA) +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK) See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 417
Thread Starter |
Thanks Glenn. I noticed from 400hz and up the absorption numbers doesnt really change from really low-density panels. Its in the low end that it does really change. So thats what i thought. (All frames are 4" thick) |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334
| Quote:
Glenn gave you the correct answer. That stuff will work for bass traps too, and in that case you'll do better to make the traps six inches thick if possible. But even at four inches thick they're work. --Ethan
__________________ Ethan's audio book is now available! | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 417
Thread Starter |
Thanks I found 100kg/m3 panels today. and i might be buying some for the remaining frames |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,414
|
Speaking of density, I was putting some treatment ideas together and I started thinking about mixing and matching 705 and 703. (4 inch traps made from 2 inches of 703 + 2 inches of 705) I am not sure I have seen this done and wondering if there are pros and cons for that.
__________________ Ronan Chris Murphy+ http://ronansrecordingshow.com Six Day Recording Boot Camps in Los Angeles July 16-21, 2012 |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,697
| Quote:
Andre | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| high density rockwool | loaf | Studio building / acoustics | 8 | 8th February 2012 04:51 PM |
| Is there any use at all for low density rockwool | orange | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 5th July 2007 10:53 PM |
| Wrapping Fiberglass Acoustic Panels | skylab001 | So much gear, so little time! | 21 | 4th June 2007 02:47 PM |
| Should I double up the fiberglass for wall panels? | KurtR | So much gear, so little time! | 22 | 1st March 2006 08:14 PM |
| Ideas on building fiberglass panels | KurtR | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 17th February 2006 08:11 PM |
| |