SE Reflection filter - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics > Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc


SE Reflection filter

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th February 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
Tube World's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Franklin TN
Posts: 2,401

Thread Starter
Talking SE Reflection filter

I have a treated studio with bass traps, and panels, and decided on trying out this filter for vocals and wanted to share my conclusions.

Like many others, I found it pretty heavy. I had to slide the rod all the way forward to help keep in steady on a decent mic stand. I found when I sang into it, I still heard some reflections off the walls in my studio. The good news is, the reflections did not go into my mic but were only in the studio. Bottom line, this filter is great and it worked very well with vocals, and even a guitar amp. Pushing a mic too far in gives a very dry sound which I didn't like. However when you have the mic just inside the filter, you can get very good results. I got the best results with a panel behind the singer and the SE filter in front of the singer. I am buying another one as many times I have 2 singers sing at the same time in my studio.

Good job SE on your reflection filter.
Tube World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008   #2
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 290

would this give a bigger sound to the vocals? I sing in a walk in closet? would it help? FYI RAP < SPOKEN WORD>
kincept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

What it does is actually makes a smaller sound on the vocals, but clearer, and you can then be free to make it bigger with reverbs etc. You give something up on the track but make it back in spades on the mix.

I have 2.
peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008   #4
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tube World View Post
I have a treated studio with bass traps, and panels, and decided on trying out this filter for vocals and wanted to share my conclusions.

Like many others, I found it pretty heavy. I had to slide the rod all the way forward to help keep in steady on a decent mic stand. I found when I sang into it, I still heard some reflections off the walls in my studio. The good news is, the reflections did not go into my mic but were only in the studio. Bottom line, this filter is great and it worked very well with vocals, and even a guitar amp. Pushing a mic too far in gives a very dry sound which I didn't like. However when you have the mic just inside the filter, you can get very good results. I got the best results with a panel behind the singer and the SE filter in front of the singer. I am buying another one as many times I have 2 singers sing at the same time in my studio.

Good job SE on your reflection filter.
Thanks for taking the time to post your review. Do you have any with and without wav files (mp3s) you could post? I really would like to hear the sound with the mic pushed back more as I have read that it causes a bit of comb filtering when done this is done.

Glenn
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)

See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
Lagerfeldt's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 4,770

We did what I would call an extensive test (three tests actually, in two different studios) on my Danish sound tech forum, Lydmaskinen. I don't know if sound clips still exist online but perhaps I can make them available again.

The sE Reflexion filter is not very useful in my opinion, not for any of the tests. Actually it seemed to do quite a bit of comb filtering very easily. Like Glenn mentioned above.

In test 1 (the untreated room) much better solutions exist (panels), even though they all do take up a bit more space. It wasn't possible for the filter to replace even moderate amounts of regular treatment with panels in a room. Buy or build panels for the same amount and you're most likely a lot better off, even though it does take up more space. If space is an issue perhaps the filter could be a backup solution or part of a solution if you're willing to compromise on sound quality.

In test 2 (the treated room) it only seemed to make things worse. All recordings were better without the filter, no matter the distance or setting. So no improvement there, but quite the opposite in fact. The comb filtering was quite evident, at all distances.

In test 3 (treated room, but different studio): same result as in test 2.

A lot of people claim it a bogus product and compare it to this but I wouldn't go that far. I'd never buy or use one myself though.
__________________


Professional geek


Online Mastering


-
At the moment: Mastering Christopher (EMI) ยท Mixing Michalis (Universal)
Lagerfeldt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2008   #6
Gear maniac
 
kubimusik's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 209

Just tried the SE Reflexion Filter for a vocal session in a typical small project studio and have to say, it makes a noticeable difference for the better.

I made sure to use it exactly as instructed (mic centered relative to the SE on vertical and horizontal axis, membrane flush with the front edge of the SE) and it does indeed focus the sound substantially, without any of the muffled low-end problems caused when I tried to minimize the room effect by creating 'vocal booths' using foam or blankets around the singer. (Plus it also keeps the singer from becoming claustrophobic inside a makeshift foam tent...)

The only thing I added was a little absorption above the singer on the ceiling, to get rid of the worst early reflections from there.

I'm sure it's still better to simply record in an acoustically perfect space without having to worry about garbage entering the back of the mic, but my guess is, that's not what the reflexion filter was built for - it's intended to minimize the effect of less desirable spaces on recordings, and I find it does so very well.

Anyway, I'm keeping mine. Great product.

thumbsupthumbsupthumbsup
kubimusik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
dangoudie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 602

I've got one and I agree mounting it is problematic.

However, the sound is great in an untreated room. My room is S**T but using the reflexion thingy it totally removes all the garbage. It's perfect for my because I do on location recording too so I have a mobile vocal booth.

If your studio is already beautifully acoustically designed then you don't need this but they're not aiming at that market. I over dub vocals in my bedroom and it really lets a good mic shine. I use an SE Gemini mkII with the diaphragm level with the edges of the filter.

One poor design is the straight lines of the panelling because you get quite a bit of bass build up at the back but as long as you don't plunge the mic in too far it doesn't matter.

I've seen them used on OH mics but the recording I heard didn't sound very nice. The rest of the track was fine but the cymbals were very harsh. Dunno if that's just a bad mix though.
dangoudie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
Svens's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Rheden
Posts: 558

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagerfeldt View Post
A lot of people claim it a bogus product and compare it to this but I wouldn't go that far. I'd never buy or use one myself though.
You are the first one I heard about this.
Svens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008   #9
Lives for gear
 
Tube World's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Franklin TN
Posts: 2,401

Thread Starter
Don't tell Bono the SE Reflection filter is not good, he loves it. U2.com | Highlights Note that they put the mic just inside the lip of the filter which I found does not cause any negative comb effect. I read a quote that Stevie Wonder likes it too.
Tube World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

I'm posting this to remind myself to do the comb filtration test (not hard, just run pink noise into the room and wave the mic around)...
peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008   #11
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by peeder View Post
I'm posting this to remind myself to do the comb filtration test (not hard, just run pink noise into the room and wave the mic around)...
I already measured the frequency response of a microphone inside the RF:



--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
I already measured the frequency response of a microphone inside the RF:

--Ethan
You don't mention a protocol... I generally only consider plots that I can 100% reproduce.

I'll do the comb filtering test this week when I get a second.
peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008   #13
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,253

When I do use mine, I also use it with the mic extended out pretty much as far as it will go from the filter itself. It does tighten up the sound, using with a cardioid mic I've had no issues and many times prefer the sound and when I do I hit the red button.

War
__________________
Warren Dent, Owner - ZenPro Audio: Gear Now & Zen

warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
bcgood's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,952

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
I already measured the frequency response of a microphone inside the RF:

--Ethan
Hey Ethan are you the Dr. Evil of acoustic treatment? Just kidding!



__________________
bcgood

bcgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
3rd&4thT's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 761

Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead View Post
When I do use mine, I also use it with the mic extended out pretty much as far as it will go from the filter itself. It does tighten up the sound, using with a cardioid mic I've had no issues and many times prefer the sound and when I do I hit the red button.

War
Ditto, you can use the mic outside the enclosure and it will still help. You can also angle the mic off the centerline outside the enclosure and it still kills much of a bad room.

Also, if you're having severe trouble with ceiling reflections, try draping a towel across the top with the mic in the clear out front. You'll probably get a plot worse than Ethan's but if you're sufficiently desperate....

3rd&4thT
__________________
"Batteries Not Included."
"Safe When Taken As Directed."
"Available at All Fine Stores."
"Check Our Website."
"Ask Your Doctor."
"Now on DVD."
"Member FDIC."
"Except in Nebraska."
---------------- Voiceover Tag Team
3rd&4thT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008   #16
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by peeder View Post
You don't mention a protocol... I generally only consider plots that I can 100% reproduce.
Sorry, I should have linked to the full test with photos etc. Here it is:

RealTraps - Portable Vocal Booth

Scroll down a bit to the test details.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008   #17
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,253

Ethan, no offense but your test should also include a shot of a vocalist still being able to visually communicate with his / her band while tracking. You state that you and your partner noticed obvious coloration with the sE filter, and the closer you place the mic to anything the more coloration you're going to hear, and you used an OMNI mic for your tests (which is fine, but a real world test is using a cardioid mic on a vocal and not an OMNI mic on a speaker in your living room). I guess your tests are valid in their own informal way, but it's not how the products are being used.

I have always preferred the sound of the sE with the CARDIOID mic being fully extended away from the filter. I even have success using figure 8 ribbons in the same position on loud guitar cabs.

I think a great visual demonstration of the value of the sE Electronics Reflexion Filter is the video featuring Bono linked earlier in this thread. It sounds great and you can see everyone else in the room while using it. With all due respect to Stevie Wonder, yes he endorses the Reflexion filter but obviously experiences only an audible improvement and rather cannot benefit from visual communication since he is blind.

I think it's great you were inspired to create a "me too" product by sE, and you took their design in a different direction that to me isn't necessarily "better" for all situations. It is what it is, and both products fill a need differently.

War
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #18
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,995

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcgood View Post
Hey Ethan are you the Dr. Evil of acoustic treatment? Just kidding!



He would need a "mini me"






Glenn
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #19
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead View Post
you used an OMNI mic for your tests (which is fine, but a real world test is using a cardioid mic on a vocal and not an OMNI mic on a speaker in your living room).
I think you miss an important point. The vocal examples were all recorded with a cardioid microphone as per convention. The coloration you hear is with a cardioid. The microphone was not pushed all the way into the sE filter, but it wasn't pulled all the way out either because the microphone stand would have tipped over from the weight and lack of balance.

Acoustic tests must be done with an omni microphone for various reasons I can elaborate on if needed. Also, the acoustic tests were not done in a living room, but in my large (33 by 18 foot) studio.

Also Warren, everyone here knows that I am the manufacturer of the RealTraps Portable Vocal Booth. But it's not clear in your posts or sig that you sell the sE Reflexion Filter as well as acoustic treatment products made by at least three other companies that compete with RealTraps. The tone of your post ("you were inspired to create a 'me too' product") is unfair and inappropriate without providing that full disclosure. Calling RealTraps "me too" is especially unfair given that all four of the other acoustic companies you represent (and some others you don't represent) have all copied RealTraps in one way or another. So please, let's keep this discussion to the facts, and make sure any affiliation is perfectly clear for all to see. I say this with the utmost respect for you and your company.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #20
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,253

Ethan, I assumed since sE was first to market with this product and you followed with yours and use the sE as the benchmark that it is a "me too" product (which all I'm saying is, you realized doh! there's a market for this) so didn't think that was unfair.

A short search on my site and you'll see sE Electronics for sale, I can't link every manufacturer I deal with in my sig.

I understand the omni testing, I'm saying that your simple plot post doesn't tell near the whole story of why one device might still out perform the other in certain instances. I don't doubt your testing: I'm saying in real life I have no issues using the filter correctly (with a $24.95 On Stage Stands MS7701B on Friday to track vocals, mic fully extended in a shock mount, no tipping). I don't know what stand you're using but, the cheapo works for me when needed!

I have respect for you and your company as well, hope you didn't take my post as some kind of extreme opposition. But there is more to the story from both sides. Dropping that plot in there wasn't exactly a black and white answer for anybody so I responded.

War
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #21
Lives for gear
 
Tube World's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Franklin TN
Posts: 2,401

Thread Starter
Hey, just use what works for you. If you get a comb effect, then use another type of vocal booth, the one Realtraps has probably is great. if you find the SE Reflection filter works for you, use it. There is no reason to ague and for someone to tell you your wrong in using it or it makes the recordings sound worse. All that matters is you are happy.
Tube World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #22
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead View Post
Ethan, I assumed since sE was first to market with this product and you followed with yours and use the sE as the benchmark that it is a "me too" product (which all I'm saying is, you realized doh! there's a market for this) so didn't think that was unfair.
I understand, and I really don't want to blow this out of proportion. But just to be clear, we had this at least two years before the sE filter came out:

Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #23
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,253

It's not blown out of proportion, but that is standard gobo type of positioning that has been used for decades. I like that sE put it into a single piece, convenient stand mounted form. Several companies followed sE quickly with similar devices also.

I sent you a PM also Ethan. I just want everyone to know it's not like I'm angry etc, but I feel there are things to consider with the sE also (which yes I am a dealer for) that don't have to do with a plot alone. Like Tube World said, it's all in what works best for each of us. I like the sound and visual communication afforded by the Reflexion!

It's all good. thumbsup

War
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #24
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

I just don't have room for the pvb, and while my room is already well-treated, I find the SERF helps dry out the vocal like I said and allow me more creative reverb use at mix time.

I imagine the larger pvb is more effective per dollar, provided you have the space (and no one needs to see over or around the thing.
peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #25
Lives for gear
 
rarseman's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,136

Ok
I can clear this little mess
I have both SE reflection filter and 3 mini traps on mic stand; they both work together excellent.

Now someone needs to come out with a light version like SE so I can mic a double bass/guitar with a TLM 49/R121
__________________

Yul
rarseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #26
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,253

Welcome to sE Electronics
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #27
Lives for gear
 
rarseman's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,136

saw that
doesnt help since the mic is shoved in the hole...
Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead View Post
rarseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #28
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,253

Oops, I didn't take into consideration the mic you mentioned...

See, new product opportunity!

War
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #29
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

Now the "IRF" (mini-SERF) I think is worthless.
peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2008   #30
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,253

Never used it, can't comment.

What did you try it on Peeder?

War
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
SE Reflection Filter Anyone? ShaneFontane So much gear, so little time! 56 25th February 2012 11:05 PM
sE Reflection Filter...$300?! soupking So much gear, so little time! 36 8th August 2007 06:15 PM
Cheapskate's answer to Reflection Filter willsing Low End Theory 5 11th July 2007 09:26 PM
Small Reflection filter davebl@dircon.c High end 8 19th May 2007 10:50 PM
New question on the reflection filter Revelation So much gear, so little time! 3 16th December 2006 11:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:55 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.