![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Thread Starter | A Guy from Holland needs help with absorbers
Hello Guys; First of all, I live in Holland, so excuse my English writing. I am planning to built sound baffles my self. The main goal is controlling the low frequensies. The construction i'm planning to make is similar to the attached picture. MDF in the middle and on both side Rockwool 213 ( semi high density ). The size will be something like 180 centimeter x 60 centimeter. If I am correct this is about the same as 6 x 2 Foot ( 70 inch x 23 inches )..... What I wanted to know is the following: How thick should the MDF be ?? I mean, should it be heavy to make it work better on the low frequencie ......... ???? Thicker & Heavier is always better ??? How thick should the Rockwool be ?????? Thicker & Heavier is better ?????? Is it wise to mount different holes in the MDF board to create "air" ... ??? Or maybe is it wise to create an AIR space between the MDF and the Rockwool by making a construction so the Rockwool may float ??? Well .......... A lot of questions but as we say over here ......... If you don't ask - you won't know .......... Leonneke |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2006 Location: Cleveland, Oh
Posts: 228
|
Hi there, I built some similar free standing units with the goal of minimizing mic bleed between two musicians. I used 4" of insulation on each side of 3/4" MDF. There are plenty of great panel projects on this forum. I think for what you are trying accomplish, the addition of MDF might be unnecessary - also hanging from the ceiling might cause some support issues as MDF is pretty heavy. I think a box with 4" of dense insulation would suit your needs. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. You should probably tell us more about your room so some of the real pros can help you. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 15
| Here's what I use Blogs to keep you updated with RBA They are free standing baffles that are moveable
__________________ Adam adam@recordbetteraudio.com http://www.recordbetteraudio.com http://www.fergusonmusicproductions.com |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005 Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 764
|
That hanging style of baffle works on a little different principle than standard absorbers. The idea with those is to actually allow them to move and swing a bit - thereby absorbing some bass energy. Each progressively longer baffle will swing at a different frequency just like a pendulum on a clock which is adjusted by moving the mass up and down on the shaft. There are a variety of ways to arrange a group of these depending on your requirements and layout options. In general, more mass = lower frequency but less efficiency also. Start out with something like 3/8 or 1/2" plywood. Make sure to hang them far enough apart that they don't bang together. Bryan
__________________ I am serious, and don't call me Shirley Bryan Pape Lead Acoustical Designer GIK Acoustics |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| D&R Holland 8000 Series | ultima | So much gear, so little time! | 29 | 23rd June 2010 01:56 PM |
| Bjork On Jules Holland-What is this? (Not Reactable) | jacob eli | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 25th October 2007 04:12 PM |
| Sebatron dealer in Holland/Europe | jaye b | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 10th August 2005 09:54 PM |
| question about panel absorbers | hollywood_steve | Geekslutz forum | 13 | 15th March 2004 06:25 PM |
| |