![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ATS Acoustics | erock | Low End Theory | 16 | 25th August 2007 01:12 PM |
| ATS Acoustics ??? + another DIY/Corning 703 thread. | FossilTooth | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 6th July 2007 11:44 AM |
| Thanx to GIK Acoustics | TampaBaySound | So much gear, so little time! | 14 | 2nd September 2006 01:33 PM |
| ATS acoustics anyone? | djanogil | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 9th May 2006 02:42 PM |
| ReadyTraps v.s. ATS Acoustics v.s. GIK Monster Traps | scius | Low End Theory | 141 | 30th March 2006 06:16 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 18
| ATS Acoustics VS GIK So, it looks like the cost of the ATS for 6 24x48x2 panels (ATS Acoustic Panel 24x48x2) is about $110 cheaper (price comparison factors shipping) than the same GIK panels (GIK ACOUSTICS) that size. Anyone have any opinions to help me decide which ones to go with? They don't seem much different. Either way they both seem very reasonable. Thanks! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Brown Summit, NC, USA
Posts: 335
| The ATS panels have a 1/4" wood panel covered back and the GIK's have open backs. I would imagine the open back would allow for more absorption in the low frequencies but I'm sure there will be a few people along here shortly to let you know for sure.
__________________ www.seawellstudios.com |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,423
| Hey wolfsbayne, My name is Glenn Kuras and I am the owner of GIK Acoustics. ![]() I can’t comment so much on ATS products but from my understanding it is 4 pound mineral wool with burlap stapled to a solid piece of wood. I really think all panels need a air gap to the back. For a couple little areas here and there it might work ok, but for us we have taken a little different approach to the build, which if you compare our lab numbers you will see the difference. The core of our panels are built with 8 pound mineral wool with a wood frame around the perimeter to not only give it stability and a way to hang, but it also gives it a air gap to the back to help absorb more of the low end and leaves the back open. We also put a plastic frame to the front (you can not see this) to keep all the edges sharp and clean. As far as fabric we use a special fabric (NOT CHEAP AT ALL ![]() ) to the front which not only looks like something that should be on the wall but helps to act as a membrane to help pick up more of the low end but keeping more of the highs in the room. We also use a different fabric for the back that is very open celled to let sound through easily (very important). Just on build alone we are pretty proud of our products and the price, but the one thing we have is a staff of people that can help you with room set up. Not just some general, throw some stuff here and there but working with each customer from start to end. I would HIGHLY recommend emailing us and let us prove to you the level of expertise we have. I think (or should I say I HOPE) you would justify the small price difference. I hope that helps you a little. Thanks, Glenn |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Washington DC
Posts: 167
| hey all, The open back definitely does help for low freq absorption. The ATS panels can also be made with an open back design for $6 more I believe. I outfitted my entire mixing room with ATS's Owens Corning 705 2-inch rigid Fiberglass panels and I gotta say it made the most difference in my work than any piece of gear has! I'm sure GIK has outstanding products as well, but the ATS build quality is perfectly acceptable and I expect to use them for many many years. and they're a fantastic deal! take care... |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 29
| Quote:
thanks | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Brown Summit, NC, USA
Posts: 335
| Quote:
__________________ www.seawellstudios.com | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,421
| Quote:
![]() --Ethan
__________________ www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts ----------------------- Amazing Telecaster guitar video | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 435
| OK. I'll stick my neck out and point out the differences even though I'm slightly jaded: Besides the things Glenn has listed above, have you compared the absorbtion numbers on the panels? Look at the difference in performance below 250 Hz. ATS 4" 50 0.22 63 0.26 80 0.28 100 0.68 125 0.65 250 1.10 GIK 244 50 0.47 63 0.45 80 0.66 100 0.89 125 0.93 160 0.84 200 1.05 250 1.00 These number are for an 'A' mount flat on the wall as per standardized testing. Both panels were tested in the same lab so a direct comparison should be relatively telling. Add in that we'll work with you to determine what's best for your room and IMO it's a no brainer. Hey, sometimes we end up telling people to buy LESS than what they were initially interested in. ![]() The point is that we want our customers to be happy with their purchase. We go the extra mile up front to provide you with a suggested treatment plan for your space and will work within the budget to get you the best solution that it will buy. After the sale, we'll still be happy to work with you with any placement issues, room setup to get you better performance, etc. I can't speak to what ATS will do for you or to the experience any of their personnel may have in acoustical design and analysis. I simply don't know. It's not a slam, just that I don't know. So I guess the question really is - " Is the extra performance and service worth an extra $110 for 6 panels (less $36 for the open backs)?" Only you can answer that. [/end of public service announcement] ![]() Bryan
__________________ I am serious, and don't call me Shirley Bryan Pape Lead Acoustical Designer GIK Acoustics |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: North Idaho
Posts: 194
| How long have you been using this plastic frame? I have some GIK traps, one of which I disassembled to fit around a door handle and it didn't have a plastic frame... |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,423
| Ever since it was tested, so I believe that would be about 1.5 years? Boy time flys! |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Washington DC
Posts: 167
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear nut Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 123
| I have a baker's dozen ATS acoustics traps, both the 2" and the 4" in 2x4 foot sizes, and 4" in 2x2. My take on ATS: as a company, super easy to deal with, inexpensive, fast shippers, nice on the phone too. My take on the panels: they worked great in my previously crappy sounding room, but were ridiculously heavy and an absolute bitch to hang. I ended up using "L" braces as shelves--putting the L's into the studs and drywall screwing the ATS panels into the L's. If I ever have to relocate them, I'm going to take a door-knob drill bit and ventilate the back & side panels to lighten the load and let more sound get to the mineral wool, then recover them. Oh, they also stink when you first get them. I aired mine out for a few days to a week before bringing them into the house. The smell of unwashed burlap and (I'm assuming) formaldehyde glues. Nasty. Minuses aside, I'm happy with the product for the price I paid. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 220
|
__________________ "I long for the days of the virgin, and the elegance of railway travel." |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Washington DC
Posts: 167
| interesting...i don't recall having the smell issue with mine (it would have definitely been annoying though) put 'em up the day I got them. I will admit that 24 panels i ordered were VERY heavy in the shipping boxes. The install wasn't too bad for me...about what I expected. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,241
| Anybody know how these compare? Ready Acoustics, LLC - Afforadble, Durable, and Stylish Acoustic Products - Bass Traps - DIY! Solutions - Mounts - Insulation |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2004 Location: San Diego
Posts: 277
| Another |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
| Absolutely LOVE my GIK's. The room isn't finished yet, but already sounds REALLY good.....
__________________ RandyLand myspace.com/bambooneedle |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,423
| Wow!!!!!!!! Looks super cool.. Hey we have a new web site design that is live, but you mind if I post that picture on it? If you have anymore please send to glenn.k@gikacoustics.com Thanks for the kind words. ![]() Glenn |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 549
| As a customer, I ordered some 6lb Roxul from ATS acoustics. It shipped the same day I ordered and got to me within a couple days. They get an "A" for service from me. From that, I made 8 4in deep 2x4 panels and 2 2x2 panels. It was a great DIY project and my room sounds a lot better now (and i need a lot more panels). However, between the raw material costs (roxul, lumber for frames and felt for covering) and the time i spent on making these panels.......it came out only a few dollars cheaper than if I'd just ordered from GIK in the first place. DIY was nice......but i don't have that kind of time anymore. next month, it'll be a phone call to Glenn. cheers, wade |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: May 2007 Location: AZ, USA
Posts: 61
| Quote:
They came out much better than expected. I was able to use this project as my "cover" to buy some power tools...I did a cost analyis and when I subtract the cost of the power tools my panels cost just a bit less than if I had purchased from Glenn. I think when I get around to my "second phase" of treatment I'm already leaning toward placing an order with GIK. I'm happy with the panels I made. I'm glad I did it. But now that is over and I look at the time involved - I'll probably just buy from GIK and save all that time I spent in the garage. On a side note, Ethan, Glenn, Bryan I know you hear this all the time, but seriously thank you for being so open with your acoustic advice. I know you have your own businesses and have your own proprietary way of making these panels, but in my opinion you really have gone above and beyond with giving "free advice." Seriously - thank you. So, there's my 2 cents. | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 549
| Ryuben, those look really nice. I've attached a couple pics of mine as well. I put the frames on mine inside and used 1x2's for it. cheers, wade |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: May 2007 Location: AZ, USA
Posts: 61
| Quote:
I like seeing other people's designs on these things. Your construction of using the 1x2's gave you all that absorption on the side of the panels. Nice! I'll bet they look nice on the walls of your place. I can tell ya - cutting all the holes in my frames was a *real* pain. some of the holes were cut just a little too close to the edge - which made getting the fabric stapled in those areas a little more challenging. I then used the router on everything to give it a softer feel... Sanded, stained, etc. It was a lot of work....and I'm sure you know exactly what I mean! Now that I've done it, I can say I've done it. I got what I wanted for my first phase of treatment, but I'm with you, Wade, I don't have that kind of time anymore. To the original poster - I have read a lot of good things about the GIK panels. Glenn (from GIK) gives a lot of good, free information on this site. I have nothing bad to say about ATS at all...but I know that when I get down to purchasing some panels with my next phase, I'm working with GIK. | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: around the corner
Posts: 1,964
| Ryuben, Those are too good looking for panels man! If I were you, I would look for some dummy VU meters, or maybe even cheap compasses to stick in the holes. I know that would cut down on the side exposure, but it would look like the most killer huge vintage wooden-sided preamp with 50 channels that anyone had ever seen! Just think what client talk would spread about what you have........ Seriously though, those are way nice |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: May 2007 Location: AZ, USA
Posts: 61
| Quote:
All my recordings would *have* to sound good with a 50 channel wooden-sided preamp. ![]() On a side note, the 2 other 2x4 traps like this that I made are designed so that I could have the option to keep them horizontal on the stands (like what was pictured) or re-orient them vertically and still use the same stand. That took a bit of careful planning but I wanted something that would allow me some flexibility. | |
| | |
| | #25 | ||||
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 549
| As do I! I need to go add mine to Cojo's "big thread" (How I built my basstraps), b/c it seems to be a comprehensive thread for "design" ideas and pictures and such. Quote:
Quote:
i put eye hooks and wire on the ceiling (like you would on the back of a painting), and then installed J hooks on the back of the panels, and i simply hooked the hooks onto the wire. This works nicely for hanging them on the walls as well, and is how i did the ones behind my monitors. makes them very easy to reposition (as mine do double duty at times). Quote:
![]() Quote:
the most depressing part of it all was when i was done, i said "alright, now i need about 30 more of these damn things"........ cheers, wade | ||||
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,423
| Quote:
In fact every time some asks "what kind of pre amp should I buy" I should just post plans on building your own. ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks guys for all the kind words, gearslutz rocks. Glenn | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|