1st June 2006
|
#5 |
| Mastering Moderator
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,675
Verified Member | Quote: |
Originally Posted by bob katz It's subtle to many ears, but the bottom line is because it sounds better to me done that way. But objectively, many non-liinear digital processors perform, and sound better at 96K. My ears are very sensitive to alias products, and there are far fewer in-band alias products at 96K. Processors such as the Cranesong HEDD really sound better at 96K, digital compressors do as well. The Weiss units all internally double sample, but I feel that you minimize the tradeoff by upsampling at the beginning and downsampling at the end of the chain, which turns off the up/down sampler in each Weiss unit.
So, when analog processing, the DAC feeds the analog chain, and the A/D then runs at 96K, and that feeds the digital chain, so in this case the A/D is my upsampler. |
I feel and do the same thing, maybe is just me but at 96 it seems that whatever I do with in the analog chain is better captured, and the L2 seems to sound better. Not sure about the D/A upsampling...
__________________ Velvet Room Mastering
"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?
I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
|
| |