Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Decent Console + Fulcrum VS Midrange Console
View Single Post
Old 20th March 2006   #14
Rednose
Lives for gear
 
Rednose's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,439

Mixer

go for a midrange console.
The pres and eqs will be workable and you'll get better tracks to daw.
you can allways get some great pres and a patch bay.
Good luck!
Matt


Quote:
Originally Posted by The Greening
If a lower console was only used for it's mixing purposes and maybe a slight bit of EQ, would it be sufficient, perhaps better than a more midrange console (midrange in my case is a Midas Venice 160)? **The console preamps would only be used for toms and room, outboard would be used for everything else.

What do you all think, would the ratio of 'cost:sound' be improved by buying a Allen and Heath (GL3, GL2200, other $800-1500), SoundCraft (Ghost, 200, Spirit, etc), TAC Scorpion (or other recommended lower end boards) and combining 16 direct outs into a Fulcrum RMS216

or

Would it be better to go with a Midas Venice 160?


Why the consideration:
1. I'd like a mixing board to patch and mix outboard effects on.
2. A little EQ for the final balance.
3. General feel and studio features

*Trying find the right balance between expenditure and sonics. You people are professionals with experience and your opinions know-how are valued, so thanks!

Will
Rednose is offline   Reply With Quote