[Brad McGowan]

Originally Posted by NathanEldred

But that still doesn't explain it, because one conversion in via an A/D, then mixing via multiple D/A's into a console and then converting the stereo master one more time is the requirement for mixing on a hybrid DAW/console system. That's one more conversion than the ITB/outboard gear method. Not trying to be argumentative, just kicking some ideas and opinions around. It's just that every time the two are compared, even in the best circumstances, the OTB wins for me in an obvious way. It also seems a lot more convenient with the DAW/analog console system. The integration with the outboard gear is a lot easier, not to mention you get console EQ in most cases, auxes, etc, etc. Is ITB generally prefferred by some engineers because of convenience, cost, or physically space issues, or is it truly that they feel it's a sonic improvement over the alternative?

You make some interesting observations, Nathan. Speaking for myself--I have a mixerless studio because of physical space limitations. And the convenience of instant recall is quite nice. I would never make the claim that mixing ITB is sonically better than mixing through a console. It's just different. I personally have never had the opportunity or luxury to do a direct comparison with any material I've been working on. I just try to make the best music with the tools I have at hand. I'm sure many of us here are in the same boat. The goal is to find a set of tools that helps you create the results you envision in your head. Some people like Snap-On while others actually prefer Craftsman.

Brad