Quote: |
Originally Posted by T_R_S I work everyday in a proessional studio and try to keep up with the latest in technology.
As I am typing right now I am re-bouncing a mix running 92 tracks @ 96 k with a ton of outboard processing, burning some reference mixes and sending another finished product to a mastering studio via Digidelivery all at the same time. | Cheezus - 92 tracks at 92 K, did you record it in 2 bit or something  (kidding , I'm a kidder)
Seriously though, that is an enormous workload for a native rig, what processing power are you using to run that mix (not too mention the other 10 things you were doing at the same time). You didn't mention it specifically, but I assume you are running some sort of native rig, which one?.
As I commented in my last post, I do think there are better options/tools out there than PT and I do agree it depends on the individual. I assume you were commenting on my last couple of sentences regarding arguments for PT in a commercial studio - I should have left that out as it didn't answer the original question and tends to cause $hit.
Let me clarify my last couple of sentences by saying that it is only one argument and there are many who disagree - I personally don't care - whatever works for you.  
The first two paragraphs of my answer still apply as it they relate to answering the original posters question, cheers!
__________________
"In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey" - Beck, Loser
"I do use compressors/limiters but not for controlling dynamics, I use EQ for that!" Jp22 (damn I miss him)
"Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." -- Will Durant, historian (1885-1981)
"I try to get a boom out of the bass drum, in one of my albums, my CD, boom, I try to get that big boom, I could not get a big boom, I paid bucks, and could not get the boom" - Recording Expert, Tad Donley
|