Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JulianBrightnes Hey Raal!
Thanks! I was getting worried already. I was playing round with the EQ's now a little bit, but they do really sound SSL, only reason why I'm not getting them in a heartbeat is because I have the AWS, but even then... |
hey bro!
when i was demoing the AWS and a G+, though that was one day apart and in different places, i remember the G+ E/G EQs were 'crunchier', and i preferred the E to the G channels in that test. the AWS seemed more hi fi in that it seemed to have more extended hi/low freqs. - the the low end was real nice. didn't have to work on getting the kick to sound big at all. my impression was that of being able to cop the G+ feel with the AWS (at different freq. settings - i.e. 16K on the AWS was not = to 16K on the G+), but i don't think i'd be able to get an G+ to sound like an AWS.
if i had an AWS i suspect i'd get the plugs also, just to have more EQs available and a different sound at hand... the only software EQ plug i've liked so far is hydratone. would love it if the SSL plugs did the trick too.
Quote:
|
Must say the comp is almost there, but not 100%.
|
even on a laptop i noticed the 'realSSL' file to be ever so slightly crispier, but very close to the plug files, so i think it'll be in the usable comp category for sure. at 24bit/96kHz the differences will hopefully be alot smaller.