Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Difference in sound between the MPC60 and MPC4000?

5th February 2006

Man let's stop the MADNESS.

IF I made a beat on EVERY MPC and mixed them down to 2 tracks
You wouldnt be able to tell me which was which.

I used to be the biggest defender of softsynths and adamantly against the MPC4000. I felt like GURU had an amaziing sounding engine as a soft synth (because its engine didnt effect the sound) And I was gonna stay with GURU and sell my 2000xl because of the quickness of having my sounds on my mac HD. THEN I TRIED an MPC 4000.

For me it gave better integration with my computer
Great sounding engine
and The Workflow of not having to mouse around and reduce/select windows to make music

I wouldnt use a 4k with the older 0S. versions and I believed it to be buggy before I got it. BUT with the current OS. I have NEVER had a crash (knock on wood)

It prompted me to do a thread called

MPC 4000 IS THE SHIT.

5th February 2006	#23
no ssl yet Guest Posts: n/a	Man let's stop the MADNESS. IF I made a beat on EVERY MPC and mixed them down to 2 tracks You wouldnt be able to tell me which was which. I used to be the biggest defender of softsynths and adamantly against the MPC4000. I felt like GURU had an amaziing sounding engine as a soft synth (because its engine didnt effect the sound) And I was gonna stay with GURU and sell my 2000xl because of the quickness of having my sounds on my mac HD. THEN I TRIED an MPC 4000. For me it gave better integration with my computer Great sounding engine and The Workflow of not having to mouse around and reduce/select windows to make music I wouldnt use a 4k with the older 0S. versions and I believed it to be buggy before I got it. BUT with the current OS. I have NEVER had a crash (knock on wood) It prompted me to do a thread called MPC 4000 IS THE SHIT.