Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Auto Tune v.s. Waves Tune
View Single Post
Old 4th September 2010   #78
AcoosticZoo
Lives for gear
 
AcoosticZoo's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Recording Studio Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,668

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storyville View Post
This is only half true. As someone who does ALOT of tuning work I'll concede that neither is transparent. Waves tune is significantly more transparent - and if you use it carefully, and in combination with pitch shifting, time stretching, and surgical editing you can do some pretty impressive stuff.

Let me put it this way - I did some major tuning to a song a couple of days ago. Lead vocals and four part harmony - almost every note was off. There's only a few places where the tune can really be heard. On top of that, the lead vocalist had a place where he choked on the letter "L" ending a word. He didn't have a word ending in "L" properly anywhere else in the song - so i was able to grab an L from one of the background vocalists, eq it, pitch shift, and volume match it, then cross fade it and make it seem like it belonged. I actually didn't think it was going to work when I first set out.

Point being is that you can do some serious magic bullet work when you have to. But it's EXTREMELY tedious.

Moral of the story - some jobs are best charged by the hour. Oh yeah, and Waves Tune is great. Auto-tune would have sounded all sorts of screwy.
Cool, would you like to post an example of b4 and after?
AcoosticZoo is offline   Reply With Quote