4th September 2010
|
#78 |
| Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Recording Studio Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,668
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Storyville This is only half true. As someone who does ALOT of tuning work I'll concede that neither is transparent. Waves tune is significantly more transparent - and if you use it carefully, and in combination with pitch shifting, time stretching, and surgical editing you can do some pretty impressive stuff.
Let me put it this way - I did some major tuning to a song a couple of days ago. Lead vocals and four part harmony - almost every note was off. There's only a few places where the tune can really be heard. On top of that, the lead vocalist had a place where he choked on the letter "L" ending a word. He didn't have a word ending in "L" properly anywhere else in the song - so i was able to grab an L from one of the background vocalists, eq it, pitch shift, and volume match it, then cross fade it and make it seem like it belonged. I actually didn't think it was going to work when I first set out.
Point being is that you can do some serious magic bullet work when you have to. But it's EXTREMELY tedious.
Moral of the story - some jobs are best charged by the hour. Oh yeah, and Waves Tune is great. Auto-tune would have sounded all sorts of screwy. | Cool, would you like to post an example of b4 and after?
|
| |