Quote:
Originally Posted by middletom  Hey. Thanks for your answer.
I really get, what you're talking about in your video. It's not the equipment, that makes the mix. As well as it isn't the instrument that makes the music.
Anyway. My actual question was: if the quality of the tracks is good enough to be professionally mixed.
If they are - aside from the performance - We would spend more money on a professional mix, than we'd pay for the recording to get a professional record.
While it is clear to all of us that "fix it in the mix" is not what we are looking for, and we are also aware of the "what goes in will come out"-law.
We're thankful for every input from you guys.
Thans
Middletom |
Yes, sorry that was one thing I forgot to mention. Yes your recordings sound very clean to use in a mix. i would just go with mixing I would not waste time or money going back to recording.
Let me know if you need any help.
Basement Records Studio