Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Auto Tune v.s. Waves Tune
View Single Post
Old 29th August 2010   #67
AcoosticZoo
Lives for gear
 
AcoosticZoo's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Recording Studio Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,668

Okay, In the past I've said Auto-Tune EVO is awesome terms of ease of use and musical results (when used effectively), however, I've just completed a mix where a singer couldn't pitch correctly and was all over the place.


In this instance, waves tune (lite) really excels in nudging the bad performance into shape with less "Autotuned" effect and sounded more natural. Thus, Waves Tune (lite) really excels in this instance.

If you prefer a less/more natural tuned production, then waves tune is definate a winner (when the performance is far from perfect).

Note: I couldn't get autotune to correct the notes without sounding "autotuned". However, waves tune (lite) does a far better job.

I'm a big fan of autotune evo, however, I'm glad that I have wave tune (lite) to save the day, when autotune isn't working and when I need absolute natural pitch correction.

Waves Tune (lite) beats AutoTune EVO hands down ie. when severe pitch correction is required.


Regards
Josef Horhay
Mixing Engineer
www.acoosticzoo.com
AcoosticZoo is offline   Reply With Quote