Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fletcher Haven't even heard a word about the 8816 and it's in the running? Whew... better sound through marketing!!!
FWIW... I had a nearly 180' difference assessment or the 'Mixdream' than "doogie"... but I have a pretty interesting selection of front end colors so I'm generally looking to pick up less of a personality on the back end than the front. For my "summing buss" purposes the "Mix Dream" was a better item... but as a tracking mixer the "Mini-Mixer" is cool as all get out. I love summing stuff through it... especially drums.
I've not taken the time and trouble to do a "side by each" kinda shootout... probably could at somepoint... just not this point. |
boy ... Fletch it's pretty radical .... I mean the bottom end is really extended ... I kind of compare it to the impression I had of the Radar with the Niquist converters X 10 I know , I know those are converters and this is an analog mixer but a great deal has been talked about in terms of front end or analog stages in converters but that is my impression .... vocals mixed through it has dare I say , I'll get hammeered for this but hear goes ..have a Bonoesque beautiful Day thing... now I'm hammering this thing pretty hard by the VU meters in chorus' and such but that's how it sounds the best to me so far .... I'm just not sure how much top end could be accessed later in mastering that is cause it is dark compared to an ITB mix or through the MixDream ....